Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
First-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate using a hyperangulated unchannelled videolaryngoscope vs. a channelled videolaryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult airway: a randomised controlled trial.
Taboada, Manuel; Fernández, Jorge; Estany-Gestal, Ana; Vidal, Inma; Dos Santos, Laura; Novoa, Carmen; Pérez, Alejandra; Segurola, Javier; Franco, Edgar; Regueira, Julia; Mirón, Paula; Sotojove, Rosa; Cortiñas, Julio; Cariñena, Agustín; Peiteado, Marcos; Rodríguez, Alfonso; Seoane-Pillado, Teresa.
Afiliación
  • Taboada M; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Fernández J; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Estany-Gestal A; Research Methodology Unit, Fundación Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias, Santiago, Spain.
  • Vidal I; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Dos Santos L; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Novoa C; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Pérez A; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Segurola J; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Franco E; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Regueira J; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Mirón P; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Sotojove R; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Cortiñas J; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Cariñena A; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Peiteado M; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Rodríguez A; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical University Hospital of Santiago, Santiago, Spain.
  • Seoane-Pillado T; Preventive Medicine and Public Health Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of A Coruña-INIBIC, A Coruña, Spain.
Anaesthesia ; 79(11): 1157-1164, 2024 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39075801
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

There is uncertainty about the optimal videolaryngoscope for awake tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway. The use of channelled and unchannelled videolaryngoscopy has been reported, but there is a lack of evidence on which is the best option.

METHODS:

We conducted a randomised clinical trial to compare the efficacy of the C-MAC D-Blade® vs. Airtraq® in adult patients (aged ≥ 18 y) scheduled for elective or emergency surgery under general anaesthesia with anticipated difficult airway who required awake tracheal intubation under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. The primary endpoint was the first-attempt tracheal intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included the overall success rate; number of tracheal intubation attempts; Cormack and Lehane glottic view; level of difficulty (visual analogue score); patient discomfort (visual analogue score); and incidence of complications.

RESULTS:

Ninety patients (70/90 male (78%); mean (SD) age 65 (12) y) with anticipated difficult airways were randomly allocated to C-MAC D-Blade or Airtraq videolaryngoscopy. First-attempt successful tracheal intubation rate was higher in patients allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with those allocated to the Airtraq group (38/45 (84%) vs. 28/45 (62%), respectively; p = 0.006). The proportion of patients' tracheas that were intubated at the second and third attempt was 4/45 (9%) and 3/45 (7%) in those allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with 14/45 (31%) and 1/45 (2%) in those allocated to the Airtraq group (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in overall tracheal intubation success rate (C-MAC D-Blade group 45/45 (100%) vs. Airtraq group 43/45 (96%), p = 0.494).

DISCUSSION:

In patients with anticipated difficult airway, first-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate was higher with the C-MAC D-Blade compared with Airtraq laryngoscopy. No difference was found between the two videolaryngoscopes in overall tracheal intubation success rate.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laringoscopios / Intubación Intratraqueal / Laringoscopía Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Anaesthesia Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laringoscopios / Intubación Intratraqueal / Laringoscopía Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Anaesthesia Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España