Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimizing tracking and completion of follow-up colonoscopy after abnormal stool tests at health systems participating in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program.
Subramanian, Sujha; Tangka, Florence K L; Hoover, Sonja; Mathews, Anjali; Redwood, Diana; Smayda, Lauren; Ruiz, Esmeralda; Silva, Rosario; Brenton, Victoria; McElroy, Jane A; Lusk, Brooke; Eason, Susan.
Afiliación
  • Subramanian S; Implenomics, 8 The Green, Suite # 6172, Dover, DE, 19901, USA. sujha.subramanian@implenomics.com.
  • Tangka FKL; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Hoover S; Implenomics, 8 The Green, Suite # 6172, Dover, DE, 19901, USA.
  • Mathews A; Implenomics, 8 The Green, Suite # 6172, Dover, DE, 19901, USA.
  • Redwood D; Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK, USA.
  • Smayda L; Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, AK, USA.
  • Ruiz E; AltaMed Health Services, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Silva R; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
  • Brenton V; Iowa Department of Health and Human Services, Des Moines, IA, USA.
  • McElroy JA; University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
  • Lusk B; Black Hills Special Services Cooperative, Pierre, SD, USA.
  • Eason S; West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107449
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We present findings from an assessment of award recipients' partners from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP). We describe partners' processes of identifying and tracking patients undergoing stool-based screening.

METHODS:

We analyzed data from eight CRCCP award recipients purposively sampled and their partner health systems from 2019 to 2023. The data included number of stool-based tests distributed and returned; abnormal findings; referrals and completion of follow-up colonoscopies; and colonoscopy findings. We also report on strategies to improve tracking of stool-based tests and facilitation of follow-up colonoscopies.

RESULTS:

Five of eight CRCCP award recipients reported that all or some partner health systems were able to report stool test return rates. Six had health systems that were able to report abnormal stool test findings. Two reported that health systems could track time to follow-up colonoscopy completion from date of referral, while four could report colonoscopy completion but not the timeframe. Follow-up colonoscopy completion varied substantially from 24.2 to 75.5% (average of 47.9%). Strategies to improve identifying and tracking screening focused mainly on the use of electronic medical records; strategies to facilitate follow-up colonoscopy were multi-level.

CONCLUSION:

Health systems vary in their ability to track steps in the stool-based screening process and few health systems can track time to completion of follow-up colonoscopy. Longer time intervals can result in more advanced disease. CRCCP-associated health systems participating in this study could support the implementation of multicomponent strategies at the individual, provider, and health system levels to improve tracking and completion of follow-up colonoscopy.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Causes Control Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Causes Control Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos