Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing the safety and effectiveness of different liposuction techniques for lipedema.
Fijany, Arman J; Ford, Aubree L; Assi, Patrick E; Hung, Ya-Ching; Montorfano, Lisandro; Mubang, Ronnie N; Karagoz, Huseyin.
Afiliación
  • Fijany AJ; The Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. Electronic address: arman.fijany@vumc.org.
  • Ford AL; The Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Assi PE; The Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Hung YC; The Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Montorfano L; The Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Mubang RN; The Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
  • Karagoz H; The Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 97: 256-267, 2024 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39173577
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Lipedema is a relatively common, frequently misdiagnosed, chronic condition that is often treated using liposuction when conservative therapies fail. Techniques such as traditional tumescent liposuction (TTL), power-assisted liposuction (PAL), and water-jet-assisted liposuction (WAL) are popular surgical interventions, although it is unclear how these techniques compare. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of liposuction in patients with lipedema.

METHODS:

Relevant English lipedema studies published in PubMed from January 2003 to April 2023 were identified. Ten articles with post-operative outcomes and complications data were included (2 TTL, 5 PAL, 1 WAL, and 2 articles used PAL and WAL). Results were summarized using descriptive statistics, and a randomized effects model was used to evaluate heterogeneity.

RESULTS:

A total of 2542 procedures in 906 patients were included. Combined outcomes for all techniques significantly improved pain, bruising, edema, tension, pressure sensitivity, cosmetic impairment, and general impairment (all P < 0.00001). TTL, PAL, and WAL led to significant improvements in pain reduction P = 0.0005), bruising, swelling, pressure sensitivity, or cosmetic impairment (all P < 0.05). However, WAL more effectively reduced tension and general impairment (all P < 0.005), but heterogeneity for these outcomes was high. Overall complication rates were low for the studies that used TTL (1.5%), PAL (4.0%), WAL (0%), and both PAL and WAL (2.3%).

CONCLUSION:

Liposuction techniques, including TTL, PAL, and WAL, resulted in significant symptom improvement in patients with lipedema with a relatively low complication rate. WAL may potentially result in a more substantial reduction of tension and general impairment with fewer complications; however, only a single study performed this method of liposuction exclusively. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis investigating liposuction data in lipedema treatment.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lipectomía / Lipedema Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Bases de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Lipectomía / Lipedema Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article