Compression-only versus standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can improve survival rates in individuals with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Two CPR approaches are commonly utilized, standard (S-CPR) with mouth-to-mouth breathing and compression-only (CO-CPR). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical outcomes associated with S-CPR versus CO-CPR in OHCA. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on adult OHCA patients receiving CO-CPR or S-CPR. Forest plots were generated for pooled data analysis using Review Manager version 5.4. Random-effect analyses were used, and statistical significance was set at p < .05. RESULTS: Four randomized controlled trials were included in the final analysis, encompassing a total sample size of 4987 patients (2482 in the CO-CPR group and 2505 in the S-CPR group). CO-CPR was associated with significantly improved 1-day survival compared with S-CPR (OR = 1.15; 95% CI 1.02-1.31; p = .03) and survival to hospital discharge (OR = 1.25; 95% CI 1.01-1.55; p = .04). No heterogeneity was observed among the studies for either outcome. CONCLUSION: CO-CPR emerges as a promising strategy for improving outcomes in OHCA compared to S-CPR. However, further large-scale RCTs are required to generate more robust evidence.