Split course radical radiotherapy for bladder cancer in the elderly: nonsense or commonsense? A report of 76 patients.

ABSTRACT

The role of split course radical radiotherapy in bladder cancer is controversial. We have pursued such a policy in elderly patients in view of the unpredictable toxicity of radical radiotherapy in this group. Between 1987 and 1992, 76 patients were treated in this way, with 2 weeks' treatment followed by a 3-week gap. Patients were then reassessed and, if considered fit enough, a further 2 weeks of treatment was given. Fifty-three patients (mean age 78.4 years) completed treatment and 23 (mean age 78 years) received phase 1 alone. Thirty-seven of 53 patients completing treatment has a follow-up cystoscopy at 6 months. Twenty-five percent of all patients, 36% of those completing treatment, and 51% of those undergoing cystoscopy, achieved a complete response. The reasons for not completing treatment and not being followed up cystoscopically are examined. We feel that this policy has a role in selected patients whose fitness to tolerate a conventional radical course of radiotherapy is in doubt.