RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: It is accepted that the only way to end severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 epidemic is through community vaccination. The frequency and clinical features of infection after vaccination are not known clearly. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency and clinical features of coronavirus disease 2019 seen after either the first or second dose of CoronaVac vaccination in healthcare workers and their relatives. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional retrospective survey study. The study was carried out in 2013 volunteers, including 1903 (94.5%) healthcare workers and 110 (5.5%) relatives of healthcare workers. The frequency and clinical features of coronavirus disease 2019 before and after the first or second dose of CoronaVac vaccination were retrospectively evaluated using an online questionnaire conducted in July 2021. RESULTS: A total of 2013 people, 1312 women and 701 men, participated in the study. Of these individuals, 245 (12.1%) were polymerase chain reaction positive for coronavirus disease 2019 before vaccination. Of this group, 185 (75.5% of polymerase chain reaction positives and 9.1% of the whole population) received home-based therapy, while 38 (15.5%) received hospital admission. Asymptomatic polymerase chain reaction positivity before vaccination was seen in 22 (9%) individuals. There were 177 (8.8%) participants who developed polymerase chain reaction positivity at any time after vaccination. In 129 (72.8%) of these participants, polymerase chain reaction positivity occurred 21 days after the second dose of vaccine. While the number of patients hospitalized before vaccination was 38 (15.5% of the polymerase chain reaction positivity group and 1.89% of the general population), the number of patients hospitalized after the vaccination was 17 (10.1% of the polymerase chain reaction positivity group and 0.80% of the general population). The decrease in hospitalization proportion was statistically significant (P = .002). CONCLUSION: The frequency of coronavirus disease 2019, severe illness, and hospitalization rates were found to be lower in postvaccination period. The vaccine is effective in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 and severe disease.
RESUMO
A rare case of a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who developed secondary anthracofibrosis to biomass exposure, fibrosing mediastinitis due to anthracotic enlarged lymph nodes in the mediastinum, and pulmonary hypertension because of compres- sion of the lymph nodes on the pulmonary arteries is presented. This is a case report of a 71-year-old female patient who has been followed up with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for 10 years, has no history of smoking, and has been exposed to biomass for many years. The patient, who had been hospitalized in various centers for the last 3 years due to progressive shortness of breath and dry cough, applied to us with dry cough and dyspnea complaints. On echocardiography, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure was found to be 59 mmHg. For the etiology of pulmonary hypertension, dual-energy thoracic computed tomography was performed with the suspicion of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. No filling defect compatible with thromboembolism was detected. In right heart catheterization, mean pulmonary artery pressure was 27 mmHg, pulmonary capillary tip pressure was 7 mmHg, and pulmonary vascular resistance was 3.71 woods units. Endobronchial ultrasound was applied to the patient with the preliminary diagnoses of lymphoma, anthracosis, fibrosing mediastinitis, and infection. Widespread anthracosis was observed in all lobes and segments macroscopically. The lymph node in the subcarinal area was interpreted as anthracotic lymph node. Anthracosis is defined as black pigmentation involving the mucosal, and submucosal layers of the tracheobronchial tree and the lung parenchyma. If anthracosis is associated with luminal obliteration and/or mucosal proliferation causing obstruction, it is considered anthracofibrosis. In this case, we saw that secondary anthracofibrosis, fibrosing mediastinitis due to anthracotic enlarged lymph nodes in the mediastinum, and pulmonary hypertension may develop because of compression of the lymph nodes on the pulmonary arteries, and we wanted to draw attention to it was a rare case.
RESUMO
Introduction: Long COVID is a multisystem disease with various symptoms and risk factors. We aim to investigate the post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 and related risk factors in a tertiary care center. Materials and Methods: In this observational study, based on a survey of 1.977 COVID-19 patients hospitalized from April 2020 to January 2021, a retrospective assessment was carried out on 1.050 individuals who were reachable via telephone to determine their eligibility for meeting the inclusion criteria. Results: The data of 256 patients who reported at least one persistent symptom were analyzed. Long COVID prevalence was 24.3%. Among 256 patients (median age 52.8; 52.7% female; 56.63% had at least one comorbidity), dyspnea, fatigue, arthralgia-myalgia, cough, and back pain were the most common post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (42.4%; 28.29%; 16.33%; 13.15% and 7.17%, respectively). The risk factors for the persistence of dyspnea included having lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a history of intensive care support, the requirement for long-term oxygen therapy, and a history of cytokine storm (p= 0.024, p= 0.026, p< 0.001, p= 0.036, p= 0.005, respectively). The correlation between lung involvement with post-discharge cough (p= 0.041) and dizziness (p= 0.038) was significant. No correlation between the symptoms with the severity of acute infection, age, and gender was found. When a multivariate regression analysis was conducted on the most common long COVID-related symptoms, several independent risk factors were identified. These included having lung disease for dyspnea (OR 5.81, 95% CI 1.08-31.07, p= 0.04); length of hospital stay for myalgia (OR 1.034, 95% CI 1.004-1.065, p= 0.024); and pulmonary involvement of over 50% during COVID-19 infection for cough (OR 3.793, 95% CI 1.184-12.147, p= 0.025). Conclusion: COVID-19 survivors will require significant healthcare services due to their prolonged symptoms. We hope that our findings will guide the management of these patients in clinical settings towards best practices.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Síndrome de COVID-19 Pós-Aguda , Assistência ao Convalescente , Tosse/epidemiologia , Tosse/etiologia , Mialgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Alta do Paciente , Progressão da Doença , Dispneia/epidemiologia , Dispneia/etiologiaRESUMO
Background: As vaccination against coronavirus disase-19 (COVID-19) evolves, hesitancy has become a problematic issue that has gradually spread worldwide. The main reason for vaccine hesitancy is uncertainties about vaccine side effects. Aims: To evaluate the safety of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, CoronaVac, and determine the risk factors of emergence of side effects. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: An online questionnaire was administered via the internet to healthcare workers who received one or two doses of CoronaVac. The online survey consisted of three sections detailing sociodemographic data, COVID-19 history, and post-vaccine side effects. Side effects that occurred in the period starting from immediately after the first vaccination to the end of the 14th day after the second vaccination were recorded. Results: A total of 1628 healthcare workers responded to the online survey. Of these, 24.3% had a side effect either after the first or second dose of CoronaVac. Redness and/or pain at the inoculation site, headache, muscle and joint pains, palpitations, and dizziness were the most common side effects. Female sex, age <50 years, and thyroid disorder in the pre-vaccine period were found to be risk factors for the emergence of side effects. Blood pressure control could not be achieved in 2.2% of participants despite medication use, and permanent medication was needed in 2.5% of participants for blood pressure control. Conclusion: Almost a quarter of healthcare workers have at least one side effect after the first or second dose of CoronaVac. Female gender, age <50 years, and thyroid disorder appear to be risk factors for the occurrence of side effects.