Unwinding of the Substrate Transmembrane Helix in Intramembrane Proteolysis.

Intramembrane-cleaving proteases (I-CLiPs) activate pools of single-pass helical membrane protein signaling precursors that are key in the physiology of prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Proteases typically cleave peptide bonds within extended or flexible regions of their substrates, and thus the mechanism underlying the ability of I-CLiPs to hydrolyze the presumably α-helical transmembrane domain (TMD) of these membrane proteins is unclear. Using deep-ultraviolet resonance Raman spectroscopy in combination with isotopic labeling, we show that although predominantly in canonical α-helical conformation, the TMD of the established I-CLiP substrate Gurken displays 310-helical geometry. As measured by microscale thermophoresis, this substrate binds with high affinity to the I-CLiPs GlpG rhomboid and MCMJR1 presenilin homolog in detergent micelles. Binding results in deep-ultraviolet resonance Raman spectra, indicating conformational changes consistent with unwinding of the 310-helical region of the substrate's TMD. This 310-helical conformation is key for intramembrane proteolysis, as the substitution of a single proline residue in the TMD of Gurken by alanine suppresses 310-helical content in favor of α-helical geometry and abolishes cleavage without affecting binding to the I-CLiP. Complemented by molecular dynamics simulations of the TMD of Gurken, our vibrational spectroscopy data provide biophysical evidence in support of a model in which the transmembrane region of cleavable I-CLiP substrates displays local deviations in canonical α-helical conformation characterized by chain flexibility, and binding to the enzyme results in conformational changes that facilitate local unwinding of the transmembrane helix for cleavage.

The use of amphipols as universal molecular adapters to immobilize membrane proteins onto solid supports.

Because of the importance of their physiological functions, cell membranes represent critical targets in biological research. Membrane proteins, which make up approximately 1/3 of the proteome, interact with a wide range of small ligands and macromolecular partners as well as with foreign molecules such as synthetic drugs, antibodies, toxins, or surface recognition proteins of pathogenic organisms. Whether it is for the sake of basic biomedical or pharmacological research, it is of great interest to develop tools facilitating the study of these interactions. Surface-based in vitro assays are appealing because they require minimum quantities of reagents, and they are suitable for multiplexing and high-throughput screening. We introduce here a general method for immobilizing functional, unmodified integral membrane proteins onto solid supports, thanks to amphipathic polymers called "amphipols." The key point of this approach is that functionalized amphipols can be used as universal adapters to associate any membrane protein to virtually any kind of support while stabilizing its native state. The generality and versatility of this strategy is demonstrated by using 5 different target proteins, 2 types of supports (chips and beads), 2 types of ligands (antibodies and a snake toxin), and 2 detection methods (surface plasmon resonance and fluorescence microscopy).

Coupled Transmembrane Substrate Docking and Helical Unwinding in Intramembrane Proteolysis of Amyloid Precursor Protein.

Intramembrane-cleaving proteases (I-CLiPs) play crucial roles in physiological and pathological processes, such as Alzheimer's disease and cancer. However, the mechanisms of substrate recognition by I-CLiPs remain poorly understood. The aspartic I-CLiP presenilin is the catalytic subunit of the γ-secretase complex, which releases the amyloid-ß peptides (Aßs) through intramembrane proteolysis of the transmembrane domain of the amyloid precursor protein (APPTM). Here we used solution NMR to probe substrate docking of APPTM to the presenilin homologs (PSHs) MCMJR1 and MAMRE50, which cleaved APPTM in the NMR tube. Chemical shift perturbation (CSP) showed juxtamembrane regions of APPTM mediate its docking to MCMJR1. Binding of the substrate to I-CLiP decreased the magnitude of amide proton chemical shifts δH at the C-terminal half of the substrate APPTM, indicating that the docking to the enzyme weakens helical hydrogen bonds and unwinds the substrate transmembrane helix around the initial ε-cleavage site. The APPTM V44M substitution linked to familial AD caused more CSP and helical unwinding around the ε-cleavage site. MAMRE50, which cleaved APPTM at a higher rate, also caused more CSP and helical unwinding in APPTM than MCMJR1. Our data suggest that docking of the substrate transmembrane helix and helical unwinding is coupled in intramembrane proteolysis and FAD mutation modifies enzyme/substrate interaction, providing novel insights into the mechanisms of I-CLiPs and AD drug discovery.

Cell-free membrane protein expression for solid-state NMR.

Although cell-free expression is a relative newcomer to the biochemical toolbox, it has already been reviewed extensively, even in the more specialized cases such as membrane protein expression, nanolipoprotein particles, and applications to crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Solid-state NMR is also a newcomer to the structural biology toolbox, with its own specificities in terms of sample preparation. Cell-free expression and solid-state NMR are a promising combination that has already proven useful for the structural study of membrane proteins in their native environment, the hydrated lipid bilayer. We describe below several protocols for preparing MscL, a mechanosensitive membrane channel, using cell-free expression destined for a solid-state NMR study. These protocols are flexible and can easily be applied to other membrane proteins, with minor adjustments.

Cell-free expression and labeling strategies for a new decade in solid-state NMR.

Although solid-state NMR and cell-free expression have recently become standard methods in biology, the combination of the two is still at a very early stage of development. In this article, we will explore several approaches by which cell-free expression could help solid-state NMR in its quest for biomolecular structure and mechanism elucidation. Far from being just another structure determination technique, this quest is motivated by the unique possibility of using solid-state NMR to determine the high resolution structure of a membrane protein within its native environment, the lipid membrane. We will examine the specific sample preparation requirements that such a goal imposes and how cell-free expression can play a key role in such a protocol.

Structural study of the membrane protein MscL using cell-free expression and solid-state NMR.

High-resolution structures of membrane proteins have so far been obtained mostly by X-ray crystallography, on samples where the protein is surrounded by detergent. Recent developments of solid-state NMR have opened the way to a new approach for the study of integral membrane proteins inside a membrane. At the same time, the extension of cell-free expression to the production of membrane proteins allows for the production of proteins tailor made for NMR. We present here an in situ solid-state NMR study of a membrane protein selectively labeled through the use of cell-free expression. The sample consists of MscL (mechano-sensitive channel of large conductance), a 75kDa pentameric alpha-helical ion channel from Escherichia coli, reconstituted in a hydrated lipid bilayer. Compared to a uniformly labeled protein sample, the spectral crowding is greatly reduced in the cell-free expressed protein sample. This approach may be a decisive step required for spectral assignment and structure determination of membrane proteins by solid-state NMR.