Implementation of Telehealth Resources in Primary Care in Brazil and Its Association with Quality of Care.

Background:Although several reviews on the relation between telemedicine and health care outcomes have pointed out some evidence, they have also underscored the need for further investigation.Introduction:Brazil has a national telehealth program implemented in 2007, involving teleconsulting and distance education actions in primary care.Objective:This study aims to describe the implementation of telehealth in primary care in Brazil and to identify if there is an association between telehealth and quality of care.Methods:A cross-sectional study analyzing data from interviews with 29,778 primary care team professionals in Brazil in 2014, which represents 92.5% of existing health care teams, on aspects of information technology, telehealth, and care was carried out. A multiple binary regression analysis was performed to study the associations between the extent of health care actions and using telehealth.Results:Of the 24,055 primary care units in Brazil where teams worked, only 50.1% (n: 12,055) had internet access, and 32.71% of teams claimed to be involved in telehealth actions in 2014. Between 2012 and 2014 there was an expansion in the use of telehealth resources in all regions of Brazil. The highest magnitude was observed for the association between employment of telehealth and improvement in child care (odds ratio [OR] = 2.09), followed by diabetes mellitus care (OR = 1.91), hypertension (OR = 1.89), and finally, women's health (OR = 1.86).

[Health care, quality certification and institutional support: a focus on primary health care in Brazil]. / Asistencia sanitaria, certificación de calidad y apoyo institucional: la atención primaria en Brasil.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the distribution of institutional support in primary care in Brazil and to identify associations between the activities of institutional support and the outcome of the certification of the National Programme for Improving Access and Quality in Primary Health Care (PMAQ). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted through interviews with 16 960 professionals in Brazil in 2012.To examine the relationship between the received support and the quality of health care it was made a multiple binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A positive relationship between high-level support and certification in the sub-dimensions analyzed was observed: women and child care, diabetes mellitus/ hypertension and mental health.The support activities which contributed most were: self-assessment, shared assessment, targeted workshops and training. CONCLUSION: Institutional support activities have helped to improve the quality and access of the population to healthcare in the country.

The translation into Portuguese of the 11th International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11). / Tradução para a língua portuguesa da 11a Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde (CID-11).

The 11th International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11) represents an advance in the focus on knowledge and new disease approaches. The ICD is used for different practical purposes, enabling assessment of progress in the global health agenda, resource allocation, patient safety, health care qualification, and health insurance reimbursement. It is entirely digital, with technological resources that allow periodic updating. In early 2022, ICD-11 entered into official force, having been made available in several official ICD languages such as Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, French, and English. The translation process into Brazilian Portuguese, coordinated by the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), with support from the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MS) and PAHO/WHO, is presented here. The work was carried out in three stages between August 2021 and December 2022 by translators with different backgrounds: medical specialists (49), physiotherapists (1), pharmacologists (1), and dentists (1). This methodological article aims to broaden the discussion of perspectives on implementing the ICD-11 in Brazil and build an opportunity for its adaptation and use by other Portuguese-speaking countries.

A 11a Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde representa um avanço no enfoque do conhecimento e em novas abordagens das doenças. A Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde é utilizada para diferentes finalidades práticas, possibilitando avaliação do avanço da agenda de saúde global, alocação de recursos, segurança do paciente, qualificação da assistência à saúde e reembolso de seguros de saúde. É inteiramente digital, com recursos tecnológicos que permitem sua atualização periódica. No início de 2022, a 11a Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde entrou em vigência oficial, tendo sido disponibilizada em vários de seus idiomas oficiais, como o árabe, chinês, espanhol, francês e inglês. Apresenta-se aqui o processo de tradução para a língua portuguesa em uso no Brasil, coordenado pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, com apoio do Ministério da Saúde do Brasil e da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde/Organização Mundial da Saúde. O trabalho foi realizado em três etapas entre agosto de 2021 e dezembro de 2022 por tradutores com diferentes formações: médicos especialistas (49), fisioterapeuta (1), farmacologista (1) e odontologista (1). Com este artigo metodológico, almeja-se ampliar a discussão de perspectivas para implementação da 11a Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde no Brasil e construir uma oportunidade para sua adaptação e uso por outros países de língua oficial portuguesa.

Comparison of crude and adjusted mortality rates from leading causes of death in northeastern Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To present how the adjustment of incompleteness and misclassification of causes of death in the vital registration (VR) system can contribute to more accurate estimates of the risk of mortality from leading causes of death in northeastern Brazil. METHODS: After estimating the total numbers of deaths by age and sex in Brazil's Northeast region in 2002-2004 by correcting for undercount in the VR data, adjustment algorithms were applied to the reported cause-of-death structure. Average annual age-standardized mortality rates were computed by cause, with and without the corrections, and compared to death rates for Brazil's South region after adjustments for potential misdiagnosis. RESULTS: Death rates from ischemic heart disease, lower respiratory infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and perinatal conditions were more than 100% higher for both sexes than what was suggested by the routine VR data. Corrected cause-specific mortality rates were higher in the Northeast region versus the South region for the majority of causes of death, including several noncommunicable conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to adjust VR data for undercount of cases reported and misdiagnoses will cause underestimation of mortality risks for the populations of the Northeast region, which are more vulnerable than those in other regions of the country. In order to more reliably understand the pattern of disease, all cause-specific mortality rates in poor populations should be adjusted.

Excess Mortality due to natural causes among whites and blacks during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil.

INTRODUCTION: Excess Mortality by all causes considers deaths directly related to COVID-19 and those attributed to conditions caused by the pandemic. When stratified by social dimensions, such as race/color, it allows for the evaluation of more vulnerable populations. The study estimated the excess mortality by natural causes, separating the white and black populations in 2020. METHODS: Public civil registration data on deaths observed in 2020, corrected for under registration, were used. The expected number of deaths was estimated based on the mortality rates observed in 2019, applied to the estimated population in 2020. The difference between the values expected and observed and the proportion of excess was considered the excess mortality. RESULTS: The present study found an excess of 270,321 deaths (22.2% above the expected) in 2020. Every state of Brazil reported deaths above the corresponding expected figure. The excess was higher for men (25.2%) than for women (19.0%). Blacks showed an excess of 27.8%, as compared to whites at 17.6%. In both sexes and all age groups, excess was higher in the black population, especially in the South, Southeast, and Midwest regions. São Paulo, the largest in population number, had twice as much excess death in the black population (25.1%) than in the white population (11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed racial disparities in excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. The higher excess found for the black suggests an intrinsic relationship with the socioeconomic situation, further exposing the Brazilian reality, in which social and structural inequality is evident.

[Assessment of the coordination of primary healthcare: comparison of PMAQ-AB (Brazil) and international references]. / Avaliação da coordenação do cuidado na atenção primária à saúde: comparando o PMAQ-AB (Brasil) e referências internacionais.

This study aimed to compare the results obtained with the coordination of care through the Brazilian National Program for Improvement of Access and Quality of Basic Care (PMAQ-AB), with the parameters adopted by the Care Coordination Measures Atlas and the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. A cross-sectional study was performed using the dataset from the third cycle of the PMAQ-AB. Three typologies of coordination of care were created: PMAQ-AB, Atlas, and Observatory. Chi-square test was applied to compare proportions and Kruskal-Wallis and Nemenyi tests to verify and identify potential differences between the typologies. Significance was set at 5%. In all, 35,350 teams were assessed that performed some activity in care coordination. A significant difference was observed (p < 0.001) between levels of coordination, with a higher percentage between the high and medium levels in the three instruments, PMAQ-AB (56.07% and 38.35%), Atlas (52.63% and 40.66%), and Observatory (44.82% and 43.98%). In the comparison of the indicators, there was a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the typologies. For Brazil, in the PMAQ-AB typology, all the strata displayed a higher percentage between the high and medium levels; in the Atlas, stratum 1 stood out in the medium level (43.81%); the high level predominated in the Observatory. In the comparison of the indicators by strata, at least one stratum differed from the others (p < 0.001). Number 6 differed from the others (p < 0.001), and number 1 differed from all of them (p < 0.001) except number 2 (p > 0.05). The levels of coordination of care differed according to the instruments used. High and medium levels were identified, showing the need for additional studies.

O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os resultados obtidos para a coordenação do cuidado a partir do Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica (PMAQ-AB), com os parâmetros adotados pelo Atlas de Medidas de Coordenação do Cuidado e pelo Observatório Europeu de Políticas e Sistemas de Saúde. Foi realizado estudo transversal, com base no banco de dados do 3º ciclo do PMAQ-AB. Foram criadas três tipologias de coordenação do cuidado: PMAQ-AB, Atlas e Observatório. O teste qui-quadrado foi aplicado para comparar as proporções; os testes de Kruskal-Wallis e de Nemenyi para verificar e identificar eventuais diferenças entre as tipologias. O nível de significância foi de 5%. Foram avaliadas 35.350 equipes que realizaram alguma atividade de coordenação do cuidado. Observou-se diferença significativa (p < 0,001), entre os níveis de coordenação, com maior percentual entre o nível alto e médio nos três instrumentos, PMAQ-AB (56,07% e 38,35%), Atlas (52,63% e 40,66%) e o Observatório (44,82% e 43,98%). Na comparação dos indicadores, houve diferença significativa (p < 0,001) entre as tipologias. Para o Brasil, na tipologia PMAQ-AB, todos os estratos exibiram maior percentual entre o nível alto e médio; no Atlas, o estrato 1 destacou-se no nível médio (43,81%) e, no Observatório, predominou o nível alto. Na comparação dos indicadores por estratos, pelo menos um estrato diferiu dos demais (p < 0,001). O 6 se distinguiu dos demais (p < 0,001), e o 1 diferiu de todos (p < 0,001), exceto do 2 (p > 0,05). Os níveis de coordenação do cuidado diferenciaram-se entre os instrumentos utilizados. Altos e médios níveis foram identificados, demonstrando a necessidade de estudos adicionais.

El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los resultados obtenidos para la coordinación del cuidado, a partir del Programa Nacional de Mejoría de Acceso y Calidad de la Atención Básica (PMAQ-AB), con los parámetros adoptados por el Atlas de Medidas de Coordinación del Cuidado y por el Observatorio Europeo de Políticas y Sistemas de Salud. Se realizó un estudio transversal, basado en el banco de datos del 3er ciclo del PMAQ-AB. Se crearon tres tipologías de coordinación del cuidado: PMAQ-AB, Atlas y Observatorio. El test de chi-cuadrado se aplicó para comparar las proporciones, el test de Kruskal-Wallis y el de Nemenyi para verificar e identificar eventuales diferencias entre las tipologías. El nivel de significancia fue de 5%. Se evaluaron a 35.350 equipos que realizaron alguna actividad de coordinación del cuidado. Se observó una diferencia significativa (p < 0,001), entre los niveles de coordinación, con mayor porcentaje entre el nivel alto y medio en los tres instrumentos, PMAQ-AB (56,07% y 38,35%), Atlas (52,63% y 40,66%) y el Observatorio (44,82% y 43,98%). En la comparación de los indicadores, hubo una diferencia significativa (p < 0,001) entre las tipologías. Para Brasil, en la tipología PMAQ-AB todos los estratos expusieron un mayor porcentaje entre el nivel alto y medio; en el Atlas, el estrato 1 se destacó en el nivel medio (43,81%) y, en el Observatorio, predominó el nivel alto. En la comparación de los indicadores por estratos, por lo menos un estrato difirió de los demás (p < 0,001). El 6 se distinguió de los demás (p < 0,001), y el 1 difirió de todos (p < 0,001), excepto del 2 (p > 0,05). Los niveles de coordinación del cuidado se diferenciaron entre los instrumentos utilizados. Se identificaron niveles altos y medios, demostrando la necesidad de estudios adicionales.

The importance of surveillance in cases of and mortality from the COVID-19 epidemic in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2020. / A importância da vigilância de casos e óbitos e a epidemia da COVID-19 em Belo Horizonte, 2020.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the actions carried out by the epidemiological surveillance system in Belo Horizonte to address the COVID-19 epidemic and the timeless of the data for detecting transmission in 2020. METHODS: The sources of information used by the epidemiological surveillance of the municipality for COVID-19 were identified and the temporal distribution and interval for detection of confirmed cases of the disease were analyzed. RESULTS: The city's epidemiological surveillance uses outpatient, hospital, public and private laboratory notifications as data sources. For reporting COVID-19 cases in official information systems, there is also an active search of laboratory results linked to suspected deaths investigated. From January to April 2020, 1,449 hospitalized cases of COVID-19 were reported, the first case being detected in late February 2020. Of the total 1,025 laboratory samples of cases hospitalized after the 8th epidemiological week, 87 (8.5%) of COVID-19 cases were confirmed. The median time between the onset of symptoms and the release of laboratory results was 12 days for the analyzed period. CONCLUSION: Epidemiological surveillance uses several data sources to monitor and analyze the transmission of COVID-19. The timeliness of this system to detect cases of the disease is compromised by the delay in the release of laboratory results, which has been a considerable challenge for adequate surveillance.

Contribution of community health workers to primary health care performance in Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To associate the strength of community health workers interventions with primary health care strategies for women's and children's health, diabetes, and hypertension. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study assessing 29,778 family health teams working in primary health care in Brazil in 2014. The association between community health workers activity levels and primary health care facilities was analyzed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: We found higher levels of community health workers activities strongly associated with primary health care practices (OR = 6.88) for those activities targeting hypertension management, followed by children's health (OR = 6.56), and women's health (OR = 6.21). CONCLUSIONS: At a time when Brazil discusses whether community health workers should or should not remain in the same scale-up and skill level as they currently are, our results reinforce the importance of these workers for the care model advocated by the Brazilian Unified Health System.

Evaluation study of the garbage codes research project in the Northern region of Brazil. / Estudo avaliativo do projeto de investigação de óbitos por códigos garbage na região Norte do Brasil.

INTRODUCTION: The term "garbage code" (GC) is used to designate an underlying cause of death that is not very useful for the health policy, since it does not adequately identify actions to prevent and control diseases and health problems. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of GC investigation on changing causes of death in 17 municipalities in the Brazilian Northern region in 2017. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study on the results of the investigation of deaths with GC in selected hospitals in 17 cities in the seven states of the Northern region, as part of the Data for Health Initiative of the Ministry of Health (MH). In these hospitals, the underlying causes of deaths occurring in 2017 were reviewed, and the GC investigation protocol was applied to deaths with GC. RESULTS: In 2017, 37,082 deaths occurred in the 17 municipalities studied, of which 29.3% (n = 10,878) were GC and 83.2% were priority GC. Among the priority GCs, 25.9% were investigated, of which 79.1% had a change in the underlying cause. DISCUSSION: There is great variation among the 17 municipalities in relation to the proportion of GC. In 13 of the municipalities studied, the underlying cause of death was reclassified in at least 70% of the cases investigated for the priority GC. CONCLUSION: Despite the improvement in reducing the proportion of underlying causes of death with GC in this study, there is still a need for greater investment in training professionals and increasing services to carry out death investigations, in order to ensure the sustainability of the project in the region.

INTRODUÇÃO: O termo "código garbage" (CG) é usado para designar uma causa básica de óbito pouco útil para o setor de saúde, uma vez que não permite identificar adequadamente ações para prevenção e controle das doenças e agravos de saúde. Objetivo: avaliar os resultados da investigação de óbitos por CG em 17 municípios da região Norte no ano de 2017. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal sobre a investigação dos óbitos por CG em hospitais públicos de 17 municípios dos 7 estados da região Norte, como parte do projeto Dados para a Saúde do Ministério da Saúde (MS). Nesses hospitais foram revisadas as causas básicas de morte dos óbitos ocorridos em 2017 e aplicado o protocolo de investigação de CG do MS. RESULTADOS: Em 2017, ocorreram 37.082 óbitos nos 17 municípios que participaram do estudo, destes, 29,3% (n = 10.878) eram CG total e, destes, 83,2% eram CG prioritários. Dentre os CG prioritários, 25,9% foram investigados e, destes, 79,1% mudaram a causa básica. DISCUSSÃO: Observou-se uma grande variação entre os 17 municípios em relação à proporção de CG. Chama atenção que 13 municípios estudados reclassificaram a causa básica de morte em pelo menos 70% dos casos investigados para os CG prioritários. CONCLUSÃO: Apesar da melhoria ocorrida com redução na proporção de CG como causa básica de morte nos municípios analisados, ainda se faz necessário maior investimento em capacitação de profissionais e ampliação dos serviços que investigam os óbitos, de modo a permitir a sustentabilidade do projeto na região.

Quality of data on causes of death in southern Brazil: the importance of garbage causes. / Qualidade dos dados de causas de morte no Sul do Brasil: a importância das causas garbage.

INTRODUCTION: The study objective was to analyze the quality of data on causes of death in southern Brazil. METHODS: Mortality Information System (SIM - Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade) data were used to evaluate the occurrence of Garbage Causes (GC) in death certificates (DCs) of residents of South states and their capitals between 2015 and 2016. The GC of each state were compared to the other states and grouped by severity level (N1 to N4, according to decreasing potential impact on mortality profile). We evaluated the N1 and N2 GC in the 0-74 years, in accordance with local of occurrence and attesting professional. RESULTS: The occurrence of GC ranged from 29 to 31% among the three states, below the national average (34%). The GC of levels N1 and N2 were similar between states and heterogeneous between capitals. Most deaths were in-hospital, between 55%-64% of N1 and N2 GC occurred in the states and 39%-55% in the capitals. As for home deaths, this number ranged between 25%-31% and 25%-40%, respectively. More than 30% of the attesting professionals (except in Florianópolis) were declared as "others" in the corresponding DC field. Physicians from the Forensic Medical Institute (IML) and Death Verification Service (SVO) attested 15 to 24% of N1 and N2 GC in the states and 33 to 66% in the state capitals. CONCLUSION: The improvement of mortality data should involve strategies aimed at hospital physicians, in accordance with the volume of deaths and the IML and SVO services in addition to support for the emission of home DC, due to the importance in generating more severe GC.

INTRODUÇÃO: O objetivo do estudo foi analisar a qualidade dos dados sobre causas de morte na região Sul do Brasil. MÉTODOS: Foi utilizado o Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade para avaliar a ocorrência de causas garbage (CG) nas declarações de óbito (DO) de residentes nos estados e capitais da região Sul entre 2015 e 2016. As CG foram comparadas com os demais estados e agrupadas por nível de gravidade (N1 a N4, segundo potencial decrescente de impacto sobre o perfil de mortalidade). Foram avaliados os CG de N1 e N2 na faixa etária de 0 a 74 anos, segundo local de ocorrência e médico atestante. RESULTADOS: A ocorrência de CG geral variou de 29% a 31% entre os três estados, abaixo da média nacional (34%). As CG N1 e N2 foram semelhantes nos estados e heterogêneas nas capitais. A maioria dos óbitos foram hospitalares, onde ocorreram 55% a 64% das CG N1 e N2 nos estados e 39% a 55% nas capitais. Nos óbitos domiciliares, esta proporção variou de 25% a 31% e de 25% a 40%, respectivamente. Mais de 30% dos médicos atestantes (exceto em Florianópolis) não identificaram seu vínculo com o paciente, declarando-se como "outros" no campo correspondente da DO. Médicos de Instituto Médico Legal (IML) e Serviço de Verificação de Óbitos (SVO) atestaram 15% a 24% das CG N1 e N2 nos estados e 33% a 66% nas capitais. CONCLUSÃO: A qualificação dos dados de mortalidade deve envolver estratégias voltadas aos médicos de hospitais, pelo volume de óbitos e para os serviços de IML e SVO, e suporte para emissão das DO domiciliares, pela importância na geração de CG de maior gravidade.

Data for health: impact on improving the quality of cause-of-death information in Brazil. / Dados para a saúde: impacto na melhoria da qualidade da informação sobre causas de óbito no Brasil.

INTRODUCTION: Knowing the number of deaths and their causes is relevant information for public health managers. However, the cause of death is often classified with codes that are not useful for mortality analysis, called garbage codes (GC). OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the impact of investigation of the underlying cause of poorly classified deaths on death certificates in 2017. METHODS: Based on a standardized protocol, GC deaths from 60 municipalities were investigated, mainly in hospital records and autopsy services. Managers at the state level of the Mortality Information System also developed procedures to improve the classification of causes of death, with the consequent adherence of other municipalities (n = 4022). This made it possible to compare the results of GC research between these two groups of municipalities. RESULTS: In the country, among the 108,826 GC investigated in 2017, 48% were reclassified to specific causes. In the 60 focus municipalities, 58% of the 35,366 investigated deaths from GC were reclassified. After the intervention, the proportion of deaths classified as GC decreased by 11% in the country and 17% in the municipalities. DISCUSSION: The research in hospital records enabled almost half of the deaths from GC investigated to be reclassified. This is the first study to investigate GC in hospital records of more than 100,000 deaths. The 60 cities targeted by the intervention had better results than the other cities. CONCLUSION: The intervention proved to be an appropriate initiative to improve the quality of information on cause of death and should be encouraged.

INTRODUÇÃO: Conhecer o número de óbitos e suas causas se constitui em informação de relevância para gestores de saúde pública. Entretanto, muitas vezes a causa do óbito é classificada com códigos pouco úteis para as análises de mortalidade, denominados códigos garbage (CG). OBJETIVO: Descrever e avaliar o impacto da investigação da causa básica de morte mal classificada no atestado de óbito em 2017. MÉTODOS: Com base em protocolo padronizado, foram pesquisadas mortes com CG de 60 municípios que foram foco da intervenção, principalmente em prontuários hospitalares e serviços de autopsia. No nível estadual de gestão do Sistema de Informação de Mortalidade também foram desenvolvidas ações para melhoria da classificação da causa do óbito, com consequente adesão da maioria dos demais municípios (n = 4.022), o que permitiu comparações com os resultados da investigação de CG nas 60 cidades. RESULTADOS: No país, de 108.826 CG investigadas em 2017, 48% foram reclassificadas para causas específicas. Já nos 60 municípios selecionados, 58% dos 35.366 óbitos por CG pesquisados foram reclassificados. A proporção de óbitos por CG declinou em 11% no país e 17% nos municípios em que houve intervenção. DISCUSSÃO: Este é o primeiro estudo que investigou CG em registros médicos de mais de 100 mil mortes. A pesquisa possibilitou reclassificar para causas básicas específicas cerca de metade dos óbitos por CG investigados. As 60 cidades que foram alvo da intervenção tiveram melhor resultado que as demais cidades. CONCLUSÃO: A intervenção mostrou ser uma iniciativa adequada para a melhoria da qualidade da informação sobre causa de morte e deve ser estimulada.

Service users' perception about healthcare provided by teams participating in the National Program for Primary Care Access and Quality Improvement in Brazil. / Percepção dos usuários sobre o cuidado prestado por equipes participantes do Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica no Brasil.

OBJECTIVE: to analyze service users' perception of health care provided by the teams participating in the National Program for Primary Care Access and Quality Improvement (PMAQ-AB) in Brazil. METHODS: this was a cross-sectional study using data from interviews with users of services provided by PMAQ-AB teams in 2012. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze the association between perception level (very good/good, regular, poor/very poor) and variables of four primary care attributes: accessibility, integrality, longitudinality and care coordination. RESULTS: out of 65,391 users, 78.9% evaluated care as very good/good, 19.0% as regular and 2.1% as poor/very poor. Associations with care by the same physician (OR 3.21; 95% CI 2.68, 3.83) and physical examination at consultation (OR 3.08; 95% CI 2.50, 3.79) were the most prominent. CONCLUSION: the majority of users evaluated care positively, however there is perception of care problems within the recommended attributes.

Tradução para a língua portuguesa da 11a Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde (CID-11) / The translation into Portuguese of the 11th International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11)

RESUMO A 11a Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde representa um avanço no enfoque do conhecimento e em novas abordagens das doenças. A Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde é utilizada para diferentes finalidades práticas, possibilitando avaliação do avanço da agenda de saúde global, alocação de recursos, segurança do paciente, qualificação da assistência à saúde e reembolso de seguros de saúde. É inteiramente digital, com recursos tecnológicos que permitem sua atualização periódica. No início de 2022, a 11a Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde entrou em vigência oficial, tendo sido disponibilizada em vários de seus idiomas oficiais, como o árabe, chinês, espanhol, francês e inglês. Apresenta-se aqui o processo de tradução para a língua portuguesa em uso no Brasil, coordenado pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, com apoio do Ministério da Saúde do Brasil e da Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde/Organização Mundial da Saúde. O trabalho foi realizado em três etapas entre agosto de 2021 e dezembro de 2022 por tradutores com diferentes formações: médicos especialistas (49), fisioterapeuta (1), farmacologista (1) e odontologista (1). Com este artigo metodológico, almeja-se ampliar a discussão de perspectivas para implementação da 11a Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde no Brasil e construir uma oportunidade para sua adaptação e uso por outros países de língua oficial portuguesa.

ABSTRACT The 11th International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11) represents an advance in the focus on knowledge and new disease approaches. The ICD is used for different practical purposes, enabling assessment of progress in the global health agenda, resource allocation, patient safety, health care qualification, and health insurance reimbursement. It is entirely digital, with technological resources that allow periodic updating. In early 2022, ICD-11 entered into official force, having been made available in several official ICD languages such as Arabic, Chinese, Spanish, French, and English. The translation process into Brazilian Portuguese, coordinated by the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), with support from the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MS) and PAHO/WHO, is presented here. The work was carried out in three stages between August 2021 and December 2022 by translators with different backgrounds: medical specialists (49), physiotherapists (1), pharmacologists (1), and dentists (1). This methodological article aims to broaden the discussion of perspectives on implementing the ICD-11 in Brazil and build an opportunity for its adaptation and use by other Portuguese-speaking countries.

HIV/AIDS Mortality in Brazil, 2000-2015: Are there reasons for concern? / Mortalidade por HIV/Aids no Brasil, 2000-2015: motivos para preocupação?

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:: Mortality studies are essential for the monitoring of the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Quality and completeness of data from the mortality information system (SIM) require complementary approaches. METHODS:: Two sources of data were used to assess mortality trends due to HIV/AIDS in Brazil from 2000 and 2014/15: a) data from the SIM published by the Department of STDs, AIDS, and viral hepatitis, and b) Global Burden of Disease 2015 (GBD 2015) studies. Descriptive analyses were carried out and trends in relative reduction of age-adjusted mortality rates per 100,000 inhabitants were compared according to the two methods. RESULTS:: Overall, the magnitude of the mortality rates estimated by the GBD method, for Brazil and its Federative Units (FU), was greater than those obtained from the SIM. The relative reduction was higher for SIM data and there were shifts in the ranking according to the FUs. Between 2000 and 2014/15 there was an increase in the mortality rates for most of the FUs (78 and 88% according to the SIM and GBD, respectively). CONCLUSION:: Data regarding mortality due to HIV/AIDS in Brazil should be of concern, regardless of the method used. Differences in magnitude, relative reductions, and ranking can be attributed to methodological differences, but the GBD is broader, with a higher capacity to capture incorrectly classified data and causes of death not registered or not coded as being due to HIV/AIDS. Alternative and complementary data sources can provide important information for HIV/AIDS public policies in Brazil.

Coordenação do cuidado na Atenção Primária: gravidez, câncer de colo uterino e de mama como marcadores / Pregnancy, cervical cancer and beast cancer as markers of primary care coordination / Coordinación del cuidado en la atención primaria: embarazo, cáncer de cuello uterino y de mama como marcadores

O estudo buscou compreender a coordenação do cuidado pela Atenção Primária à Saúde para casos de gestação, câncer de mama e de colo uterino. O atributo foi entendido como a responsabilidade que os profissionais das equipes de Saúde da Família (eSF) têm em coordenar a atenção prestada aos usuários ao longo da rede de atenção, assumindo o acompanhamento continuado e a identificação de necessidades. De modo geral, foram identificadas ações de coordenação do cuidado mais bem estruturadas nas ações internas em nível primário, sobretudo aquelas de atenção às gestantes. Quando o trabalho de coordenação envolvia a rede, o destaque foi para a ausência da contrarreferência e para a informalidade nos processos de continuidade da atenção.(AU)

The aim of this study was to understand the coordination of primary health care for pregnant women and breast and cervical cancer patients. The attribute was understood as the responsibility family health care workers have for coordinating care delivery, including continuous follow-up and the identification of patient needs. Overall, the findings show that care coordination was better structured at internal primary care level, particularly pregnancy care. When coordination involved the care network, the findings highlight lack of counter-referral and informal processes for the continuity of care.(AU)

El objetivo del estudio fue entender la coordinación del cuidado por parte de la Atención Primaria de la Salud para casos de gestación, cáncer de mama y de cuello uterino. El atributo fue entendido como la responsabilidad que los profesionales de los equipos de salud de la familia tienen para coordinar la atención prestada a los usuarios en la red de atención, asumiendo el acompañamiento continuado y la identificación de necesidades. Por lo general, se identificaron acciones de coordinación del cuidado mejor estructuradas en las acciones internas en el nivel primario, principalmente para aquellas de atención a las gestantes. Cuando el trabajo de coordinación envolvía la red, el destaque fue para la ausencia de la contrarreferencia y para la informalidad en los procesos para la continuidad de la atención.(AU)

Excess Mortality due to natural causes among whites and blacks during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Excess Mortality by all causes considers deaths directly related to COVID-19 and those attributed to conditions caused by the pandemic. When stratified by social dimensions, such as race/color, it allows for the evaluation of more vulnerable populations. The study estimated the excess mortality by natural causes, separating the white and black populations in 2020. METHODS Public civil registration data on deaths observed in 2020, corrected for under registration, were used. The expected number of deaths was estimated based on the mortality rates observed in 2019, applied to the estimated population in 2020. The difference between the values expected and observed and the proportion of excess was considered the excess mortality. RESULTS: The present study found an excess of 270,321 deaths (22.2% above the expected) in 2020. Every state of Brazil reported deaths above the corresponding expected figure. The excess was higher for men (25.2%) than for women (19.0%). Blacks showed an excess of 27.8%, as compared to whites at 17.6%. In both sexes and all age groups, excess was higher in the black population, especially in the South, Southeast, and Midwest regions. São Paulo, the largest in population number, had twice as much excess death in the black population (25.1%) than in the white population (11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed racial disparities in excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. The higher excess found for the black suggests an intrinsic relationship with the socioeconomic situation, further exposing the Brazilian reality, in which social and structural inequality is evident.

Avaliação da coordenação do cuidado na atenção primária à saúde: comparando o PMAQ-AB (Brasil) e referências internacionais / Assessment of the coordination of primary healthcare: comparison of PMAQ-AB (Brazil) and international references / Evaluación de la coordinación del cuidado en la atención primaria en salud: comparando el PMAQ-AB (Brasil) y referencias internacionales

Resumo: O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os resultados obtidos para a coordenação do cuidado a partir do Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica (PMAQ-AB), com os parâmetros adotados pelo Atlas de Medidas de Coordenação do Cuidado e pelo Observatório Europeu de Políticas e Sistemas de Saúde. Foi realizado estudo transversal, com base no banco de dados do 3º ciclo do PMAQ-AB. Foram criadas três tipologias de coordenação do cuidado: PMAQ-AB, Atlas e Observatório. O teste qui-quadrado foi aplicado para comparar as proporções; os testes de Kruskal-Wallis e de Nemenyi para verificar e identificar eventuais diferenças entre as tipologias. O nível de significância foi de 5%. Foram avaliadas 35.350 equipes que realizaram alguma atividade de coordenação do cuidado. Observou-se diferença significativa (p < 0,001), entre os níveis de coordenação, com maior percentual entre o nível alto e médio nos três instrumentos, PMAQ-AB (56,07% e 38,35%), Atlas (52,63% e 40,66%) e o Observatório (44,82% e 43,98%). Na comparação dos indicadores, houve diferença significativa (p < 0,001) entre as tipologias. Para o Brasil, na tipologia PMAQ-AB, todos os estratos exibiram maior percentual entre o nível alto e médio; no Atlas, o estrato 1 destacou-se no nível médio (43,81%) e, no Observatório, predominou o nível alto. Na comparação dos indicadores por estratos, pelo menos um estrato diferiu dos demais (p < 0,001). O 6 se distinguiu dos demais (p < 0,001), e o 1 diferiu de todos (p < 0,001), exceto do 2 (p > 0,05). Os níveis de coordenação do cuidado diferenciaram-se entre os instrumentos utilizados. Altos e médios níveis foram identificados, demonstrando a necessidade de estudos adicionais.

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the results obtained with the coordination of care through the Brazilian National Program for Improvement of Access and Quality of Basic Care (PMAQ-AB), with the parameters adopted by the Care Coordination Measures Atlas and the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. A cross-sectional study was performed using the dataset from the third cycle of the PMAQ-AB. Three typologies of coordination of care were created: PMAQ-AB, Atlas, and Observatory. Chi-square test was applied to compare proportions and Kruskal-Wallis and Nemenyi tests to verify and identify potential differences between the typologies. Significance was set at 5%. In all, 35,350 teams were assessed that performed some activity in care coordination. A significant difference was observed (p < 0.001) between levels of coordination, with a higher percentage between the high and medium levels in the three instruments, PMAQ-AB (56.07% and 38.35%), Atlas (52.63% and 40.66%), and Observatory (44.82% and 43.98%). In the comparison of the indicators, there was a significant difference (p < 0.001) between the typologies. For Brazil, in the PMAQ-AB typology, all the strata displayed a higher percentage between the high and medium levels; in the Atlas, stratum 1 stood out in the medium level (43.81%); the high level predominated in the Observatory. In the comparison of the indicators by strata, at least one stratum differed from the others (p < 0.001). Number 6 differed from the others (p < 0.001), and number 1 differed from all of them (p < 0.001) except number 2 (p > 0.05). The levels of coordination of care differed according to the instruments used. High and medium levels were identified, showing the need for additional studies.

Resumen: El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los resultados obtenidos para la coordinación del cuidado, a partir del Programa Nacional de Mejoría de Acceso y Calidad de la Atención Básica (PMAQ-AB), con los parámetros adoptados por el Atlas de Medidas de Coordinación del Cuidado y por el Observatorio Europeo de Políticas y Sistemas de Salud. Se realizó un estudio transversal, basado en el banco de datos del 3er ciclo del PMAQ-AB. Se crearon tres tipologías de coordinación del cuidado: PMAQ-AB, Atlas y Observatorio. El test de chi-cuadrado se aplicó para comparar las proporciones, el test de Kruskal-Wallis y el de Nemenyi para verificar e identificar eventuales diferencias entre las tipologías. El nivel de significancia fue de 5%. Se evaluaron a 35.350 equipos que realizaron alguna actividad de coordinación del cuidado. Se observó una diferencia significativa (p < 0,001), entre los niveles de coordinación, con mayor porcentaje entre el nivel alto y medio en los tres instrumentos, PMAQ-AB (56,07% y 38,35%), Atlas (52,63% y 40,66%) y el Observatorio (44,82% y 43,98%). En la comparación de los indicadores, hubo una diferencia significativa (p < 0,001) entre las tipologías. Para Brasil, en la tipología PMAQ-AB todos los estratos expusieron un mayor porcentaje entre el nivel alto y medio; en el Atlas, el estrato 1 se destacó en el nivel medio (43,81%) y, en el Observatorio, predominó el nivel alto. En la comparación de los indicadores por estratos, por lo menos un estrato difirió de los demás (p < 0,001). El 6 se distinguió de los demás (p < 0,001), y el 1 difirió de todos (p < 0,001), excepto del 2 (p > 0,05). Los niveles de coordinación del cuidado se diferenciaron entre los instrumentos utilizados. Se identificaron niveles altos y medios, demostrando la necesidad de estudios adicionales.

Magnitude and variation of the burden of cancer mortality in Brazil and Federation Units, 1990 and 2015. / Magnitude e variação da carga da mortalidade por câncer no Brasil e Unidades da Federação, 1990 e 2015.

OBJECTIVE:: To analyze the mortality rates from malignant neoplasia in Brazil and Federal Units (FU) in the years 1990 and 2015, according to sex and main types of cancer. METHODS:: Using estimates of global disease burden for Brazil made by the GBD 2015 study, age-adjusted cancer mortality rates and respective 95% uncertainty intervals were calculated for Brazil and FU in 1990 and 2015, as well as their percentage variation in the period. The main causes of cancer mortality by sex were analyzed, considering the five highest rates in the country and for each state. RESULTS:: The cancer mortality rate for male and female population remained stable between the two years in the country. The same behavior pattern was observed in almost all the FU, and the majority of states in the northeast region and half of the north region showed a non-significant increase in mortality rates. Regarding the types of cancer, there was a drop in mortality rates for stomach cancers in both sexes (women: -38.9%, men: -37.3%), cervical cancer in women (-33.9%), and lung and esophagus cancer in men (-12.0% and -14.1%, respectively); in contrast, there was an increase in lung cancers in women (+20.7%) and colon and rectum cancers in men (+29.5%). CONCLUSION:: Differences in the behavior of major cancers, with a decrease mainly in the more developed regions and an increase in the less developed regions of the country, seem to reflect the socioeconomic inequalities as well as difficulties in access to health services by the Brazilian population.

Risk factors related to the global burden of disease in Brazil and its Federated Units, 2015. / Fatores de risco relacionados à carga global de doença do Brasil e Unidades Federadas, 2015.

OBJECTIVE:: To analyze the global burden of disease related to disability adjusted life years (DALYs) attributed to selected risk factors in Brazil and its 27 Federated Units. METHODS:: Databases from the Global Burden of Disease study in Brazil and its Federated Units were used, estimating the summary exposure value (SEV) for selected environmental, behavioral, and metabolic risk factors (RFs), and their combinations. The DALYs were used as the main metric. The ranking of major RFs between 1990 and 2015 was compiled, comparing data by sex and states. RESULTS:: The analyzed RFs account for 38.8% of the loss of DALYs in the country. Dietary risks was the main cause of DALYs in 2015. In men, dietary risks contributed to 12.2% of DALYs and in women, to 11.1%. Other RFs were high systolic blood pressure, high body mass index, smoking, high fasting plasma glucose and, among men, alcohol and drug use. The main RFs were metabolic and behavioral. In most states, dietary risks was the main RF, followed by high blood pressure. CONCLUSION:: Dietary risks leads the RF ranking for Brazil and its Federated Units. Men are more exposed to behavioral risk factors, and women are more exposed to metabolic ones.

[Incorporation of Information and Communication Technologies and quality of primary healthcare in Brazil]. / Incorporação de Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação e qualidade na atenção básica em saúde no Brasil.

Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) are means to handle information, streamline communication, and contribute to patient care. This article describes the incorporation of Information and Communication Technologies in primary care and its association with quality, based on the Brazilian National Program for the Improvement of Access and Quality in Primary Care (PMAQ in portuguese). This was a cross-sectional study with 17,053 teams. An Index of Incorporation of ICTs was created, which included: information infrastructure, systems, and utilization. Regression analysis was used to assess associations. Only 13.5% of the teams had a high degree of ICTs. The strongest association was seen in the utilization of information. ICTs can contribute to improving quality of primary care.