Tuberculosis disease and infection among household contacts of bacteriologically confirmed and non-confirmed tuberculosis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence of tuberculosis infection and disease in household contacts of patients with bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis disease and contacts of non-bacteriologically confirmed disease in western Kenya. METHODS: We enrolled newly diagnosed index patients and their household contacts from March 2014 to June 2016. All contacts were evaluated with a symptom questionnaire, tuberculin skin test (TST) and HIV test. Clinical evaluation and sputum testing were performed for those with symptoms, positive TST result or HIV infection. RESULTS: We enrolled 1155 contacts of 330 index patients with bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis and 192 contacts of 55 index patients with non-bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis. 3.5% of contacts of patients with bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis were diagnosed with tuberculosis, whereas no contacts of index patients with non-bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis were. Of those diagnosed with tuberculosis disease, 58.5% reported symptoms, 34.1% reported no symptoms but had positive TST results, and 7.3% had neither symptoms nor positive TST but were HIV-positive. Among 872 contacts with a TST result, 50.9% of contacts of index patients with bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis and 41.0% of contacts of index patients with non-bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis had a positive result (prevalence ratio = 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.48). CONCLUSION: In a high-burden setting, tuberculosis disease was more prevalent among contacts of patients with bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis than contacts of patients with non-bacteriologically confirmed disease. TST was feasible to perform and helped to detect cases that would have been missed had only symptomatic contacts been evaluated.

OBJECTIF: Comparer la prévalence de l'infection et de la maladie tuberculeuses chez les contacts familiaux des patients atteints de tuberculose confirmée bactériologiquement et les contacts de maladies non bactériologiquement confirmées dans l'ouest du Kenya. MÉTHODES: Nous avons recruté des patients indice nouvellement diagnostiqués et leurs contacts familiaux de mars 2014 à juin 2016. Tous les contacts ont été évalués à l'aide d'un questionnaire sur les symptômes, le test cutané à la tuberculine (TCT) et le test VIH. Une évaluation clinique et des tests d'expectoration ont été effectués pour les personnes présentant des symptômes, un résultat positif au TCT ou une infection par le VIH. RÉSULTATS: Nous avons recruté 1.155 contacts de 330 patients index avec une tuberculose confirmée bactériologiquement et 192 contacts de 55 patients indice avec une tuberculose non confirmée bactériologiquement. 3,5% des contacts des patients atteints de tuberculose confirmée bactériologiquement ont été diagnostiqués avec la tuberculose, alors qu'aucun contact des patients indice avec une tuberculose non bactériologiquement confirmée ne l'a été. Parmi les personnes diagnostiquées avec une tuberculose, 58,5% ont signalé des symptômes, 34,1% n'ont signalé aucun symptôme mais avaient des résultats positifs au TCT, et 7,3% n'avaient ni symptômes ni TCT positifs mais étaient VIH positifs. Parmi 872 contacts avec un résultat TCT, 50,9% des contacts des patients indice avec une tuberculose confirmée bactériologiquement et 41,0% des contacts des patients indice avec une tuberculose non bactériologiquement confirmée avaient un résultat positif (rapport de prévalence = 1,16, intervalle de confiance à 95%: 0,92-1,48 ). CONCLUSION: Dans un contexte de charge élevée, la maladie tuberculose était plus fréquente chez les contacts des patients atteints de tuberculose confirmée bactériologiquement que chez les contacts des patients atteints de la maladie non bactériologiquement confirmée. Le TCT était réalisable et a aidé à détecter les cas qui auraient été ratés si seuls les contacts symptomatiques avaient été évalués.

High yield of new HIV diagnoses during active case-finding for tuberculosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of a broad and nonspecific symptom screen for identifying people with undiagnosed HIV infection. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of operational data collected during implementation of a cluster-randomized trial for tuberculosis case detection. METHODS: As part of the trial, adults reporting cough, fever, night sweats, weight loss, or difficulty breathing for any duration in the past month were identified in health facilities and community-based mobile screening units in western Kenya. Adults reporting any symptom were offered HIV testing. We analysed the HIV testing data from this study, using modified Poisson regression, to identify predictors of new HIV diagnoses among adults with symptoms and initially unknown HIV status. RESULTS: We identified 3818 symptomatic adults, referred 1424 (37%) for testing, of whom 1065 (75%) accepted, and 107 (10%) were newly diagnosed with HIV. The prevalence of new HIV diagnoses was 21% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17-25%] among those tested in health facilities and 5% (95% CI 4-7%) among those tested in mobile units. More men were diagnosed with HIV than women, despite fewer men being screened. People who reported 4-5 symptoms were over twice as likely to be diagnosed with HIV compared to those reporting 1-3 symptoms (adjusted prevalence ratio in health facilities = 2.58, 95% CI 1.65-4.05; adjusted prevalence ratio in mobile units = 2.63, 95% CI 1.37-5.03). CONCLUSION: We observed a high yield of new HIV diagnoses among adults identified by active application of a broad symptom screen. Use of integrated tuberculosis and HIV screening could help close the detection gap for both conditions.