Successful autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a refractory anti-Caspr1 antibody nodopathy.

AIM: Autoimmune nodopathies have specific clinicopathologic features, antibodies directed against nodal proteins (neurofascin 186) or paranodal proteins (neurofascin 155, contactin 1, contactin-associated protein 1 (Caspr1)), and usually have a poor response to first-line therapies for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Anti-Caspr1 nodopathy treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) has not been previously reported. METHODS: We report the first case of an anti-Caspr1 antibody-positive nodopathy refractory to high-intensity immunosuppressive treatment, including rituximab, that responded dramatically to AHSCT. RESULTS: A 53-year-old woman presented with a rapidly progressive generalized ataxic, painful motor, and inflammatory neuropathy supported by neurophysiologic and MRI studies. Initial tests for antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins were negative. She was treated with multiple courses of intravenous immunoglobulin and methylprednisolone, plasma exchange, rituximab, and cyclophosphamide without significant clinical benefit. Repeated testing for antibodies to nodal/paranodal proteins yielded a positive result for anti-Caspr1/IgG4 isotype antibodies. Given the poor response to multiple high intensity treatments and the relatively young age of the patient, we decided to perform AHSCT at 30 months post-onset. Immediately after AHSCT, she stopped all immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy. The Overall Neuropathy Limitation Score improved from 8/12 to 4/12 at 6 months post-AHSCT. At 3 months post-AHSCT, IgG4 against Caspr1 was negative and no reactivity against paranodes could be detected. CONCLUSION: We report a particularly severe anti-Caspr1 antibody autoimmune nodopathy that responded dramatically to AHSCT. Although the rarity of the disease limits the possibility of larger studies, AHSCT may be a valuable therapy in treatment-refractory cases.

Resistant myasthenia gravis and rituximab: A monocentric retrospective study of 28 patients.

This retrospective study evaluated the efficiency and tolerance of rituximab in the management of resistant myasthenia gravis (MG). All patients who received rituximab for the treatment of MG between 2004 and 2015 at Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital (Paris, France) were included. The efficacy of rituximab was evaluated every 6 months by the myasthenic muscle score (MMS), the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America - Clinical Classification (MGFA-CC), the MGFA Therapy Status and the Postintervention Status (PIS). All rituximab-related side effects were noted. Twenty-eight patients were included: 21 with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies, 3 with anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies and 4 seronegatives. The mean age at day 1 of RTX was 50.6 ± 12.0 years. Patients previously received 1-4 immunosuppressants. The mean follow-up was 27.2 months (range: 6-60 months). The mean total dose of rituximab was 4.8 ± 2.5 g. The initial median MMS (58.8 points) improved significantly at M6 (74.5 ± 15.0 points; p < 0.0001) and remained stable thereafter: at M12: 75.9 ± 14.0 points (p = 0.00014), at M36: 72.5 ± 13.1 points (p = 0.0013). Among 16 patients with initial severe symptoms (MGFA-CC class IV), 14 improved. The PIS showed efficacy in about 50% of patients: at M6, 12/28 (43%) patients were considered improved. This benefit remained stable thereafter: at M12: 12/24, at M24: 7/17, at M36: 6/12. One patient developed a delayed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Based on the PIS, rituximab may be efficient in 50% of patients with MG resistant to immunosuppressants.