RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer in Canada are often effectively managed in ambulatory settings; however, patients with unmanaged or complex symptoms may turn to the emergency department (ED) for additional support. These unplanned visits can be costly to the healthcare system and distressing for patients. This study used a novel patient-reported outcomes (PROs)-derived symptom complexity algorithm to understand characteristics of patients who use acute care, which may help clinicians identify patients who would benefit from additional support. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study used population-based linked administrative healthcare data. All patients with cancer in Alberta, Canada, who completed at least one PRO symptom-reporting questionnaire between October 1, 2019, and April 1, 2020, were included. The algorithm used ratings of 9 symptoms to assign a complexity score of low, medium, or high. Multivariable binary logistic regressions were used to evaluate factors associated with a higher likelihood of having an ED visit or hospital admission (HA) within 7 days of completing a PRO questionnaire. RESULTS: Of the 29,133 patients in the cohort, 738 had an ED visit and 452 had an HA within 7 days of completing the PRO questionnaire. Patients with high symptom complexity had significantly higher odds of having an ED visit (OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.59-3.70) or HA (OR, 4.20; 95% CI, 3.36-5.26) compared with low complexity patients, controlling for demographic covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Given that patients with higher symptom complexity scores were more likely to use acute care, clinicians should monitor these more complex patients closely, because they may benefit from additional support or symptom management in ambulatory settings. A symptom complexity algorithm can help clinicians easily identify patients who may require additional support. Using an algorithm to guide care can enhance patient experiences, while reducing use of acute care services and the accompanying cost and burden.
Assuntos
Hospitalização , Neoplasias , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Alberta/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo PacienteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fecal immunochemical testing is an accepted form of colorectal cancer screening and is recommended for adults up to the age of 75 years in Canadian guidelines. However, many individuals 75 years and older continue to receive fecal immunochemical testing despite being outside accepted guidelines. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether patients aged 75 years and older with screen-detected cancer demonstrated improved outcomes and survival compared with patients with non-screen-detected cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective population-based cohort study. SETTINGS: Provincial data were collected from the Alberta Cancer Registry and the Alberta Colorectal Cancer Screening Program between November 2013 and 2019. PATIENTS: We identified an aggregated patient cohort aged 75 years and older with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer from November 2013 to November 2019, as well as patients 75 years and older who underwent fecal immunochemical testing within these dates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of screen-detected colorectal cancers was calculated. Surgical intervention, hospital length of stay, postoperative mortality, and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Between November 2013 and 2019, 3586 patients 75 years and older were diagnosed with colorectal cancer; 690 (19%) were "screen-detected." Screen-detected patients were almost 3 times more likely to undergo surgery (OR, 2.83) and had a 36% overall survival benefit (HR, 0.64) compared with non-screen-detected patients, adjusted for other variables such as age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and stage. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective study design prevents conclusions regarding causation. CONCLUSIONS: Screen detection of colorectal cancer in patients aged 75 years and older is associated with improved overall survival when controlling for other potential confounders. When compared with their non-screen-detected counterparts, these patients have an earlier stage of disease and are more likely to undergo surgical intervention with improved outcomes, irrespective of age. These data may support screening for appropriately selected patients who would otherwise fall outside of current guidelines. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B986 . SOBREVIDA MEJORADA EN UNA COHORTE DE PACIENTES DE AOS O MS CON CNCER COLORRECTAL DETECTADOS POR RIF: ANTECEDENTES:La prueba basada en una Reacción Inmunoquímica Fecal - RIF, es una forma aceptada de detección de cáncer colorrectal y esta recomendada en adultos a partir de los 75 años en las guías canadienses. Sin embargo, muchas personas de 75 años o más continúan realizándose pruebas inmunoquímicas fecales a pesar de estar fuera de las guías aceptadas.OBJETIVO:Poder determinar si los pacientes de 75 años o más con detección RIF positiva a un cáncer demuestran mejores resultados y sobrevida comparados con los pacientes sin detección.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo basado en una población definida.CONFIGURACIÓN:Se recopilaron los datos provinciales del Registro de cánceres y del Programa de detección de cáncer colorrectal de Alberta, Canada, entre 2013 y 2019.PACIENTES:Identificamos una cohorte agregada de pacientes de 75 años o más con diagnóstico de cáncer colorrectal desde noviembre de 2013 hasta noviembre de 2019, así como pacientes de 75 años o más que se sometieron a pruebas inmunoquímicas fecales dentro de las fechas mencionadas.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se calculó la proporción de cánceres colorrectales detectados mediante un cribado. Se analizaron la intervención quirúrgica, la duración de la estadía hospitalaria, la mortalidad post-operatoria y la sobrevida global.RESULTADOS:Entre noviembre de 2013 y noviembre 2019, 3586 pacientes de 75 años o más, fueron diagnosticados con cáncer colorrectal; 690 (19%) fueron detectados por cribado. Los pacientes detectados mediante el cribado, tenían casi tres veces más probabilidades de someterse a una cirugía (Razón de Probabilidad de 2,83) y beneficiaron de una sobrevida general del 36 % (HR 0,64) comparados con los pacientes sin detectación por cribado, corregidos por otras variables como la edad, el índice de comorbilidad de Charlson y el estadío del tumor.LIMITACIONES:El diseño retrospective del presente estudio impide obtener conclusiones con respecto a la causalidad.CONCLUSIONES:La detección por cribado de cáncer colorrectal en pacientes de 75 años o más se asocia con una mejor sobrevida general cuando se controlan los otros posibles factores de confusión. Comparando con las contrapartes no detectadas por cribado, estos pacientes se encuentran en una etapa más temprana de la enfermedad y es más probable que se sometan a una intervención quirúrgica con mejores resultados, independientemente a la edad. Estos datos pueden respaldar la detección de pacientes adecuadamente seleccionados que, de otro modo, quedarían fuera de las pautas actuales. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B986 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).
Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Adulto , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Canadá , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Early phase clinical studies are ongoing to evaluate the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) despite a paucity of information on the immune microenvironment. This study aims to better characterize the immune microenvironment of ACC tumours and evaluate survival outcomes based on tumour infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. METHODS: Patient characteristics, treatment and outcome data were collected for 24 ACC patients. The CD8+(cluster of differentiation 8) TIL and PD-L1 expression were quantified by immunohistochemistry. Marker expression and survival outcomes were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: All cases were negative for PD-L1 expression; four cases had focal high, eight cases had focal moderate and 12 cases had low TIL expression. Based on TIL expression, there was no difference in disease-free or overall survival. CONCLUSION: Adenoid cystic carcinoma tumours were found to be associated with a poor immunogenic microenvironment, with absent PD-L1 expression and low CD8+ TILs. There was no association between TIL expression and survival. These data suggest that PD-L1 and TIL expression are unlikely to be useful as predictive biomarkers for response to immunotherapy.
Assuntos
Antígeno B7-H1 , Carcinoma Adenoide Cístico , Antígeno B7-H1/imunologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos , Humanos , Linfócitos do Interstício Tumoral , Prognóstico , Glândulas Salivares , Microambiente TumoralRESUMO
Becoming a mother is a fundamental life-transforming event characterized by high psychosocial distress. Most prenatal programming leaves women feeling unprepared for the realities of early parenthood. The purpose of this study was to design, implement, and evaluate a brief enhancement to existing prenatal programming, Welcome to Parenthood® (W2P). Using a single-group, longitudinal design, we implemented W2P with a community sample of 454 primiparous women via 11 Parent Link Centres in Alberta, Canada. The women completed questionnaires during late pregnancy, and 2 and 6 months postpartum to capture adverse childhood experiences (ACE), depressive symptoms (Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale; EPDS), and infant development (Ages and Stages Questionnaires; ASQs). Outcomes were compared with the naturalistic values from All Our Families community cohort from the same province and to the ASQ reference samples. By the end of W2P, depressive symptoms decreased significantly (p < .0001). The number of women with high depressive symptoms (EPDS ≥ 10) decreased almost by half, from 80 (17.6%) at enrollment to 41 (9.0%) at 6 months postpartum. Women with higher ACE had the greatest decrease in depressive symptoms. Infants in W2P had significantly better development than infants in reference samples. W2P is associated with improved maternal mood and infant development. Given that W2P is brief and uses natural supports, it may be integrated into existing prenatal programming for first-time mothers.
Assuntos
Depressão Pós-Parto , Canadá , Criança , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Mães , Período Pós-Parto , GravidezRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) has not been widely explored in survivors of childhood cancer. Yet, childhood survivors are at risk of experiencing late effects and may be especially vulnerable. The aims of the current study were to conduct a retrospective chart review to determine the prevalence and persistence of FCR among survivors of childhood cancer and to examine factors that may be related to FCR. METHODS: Survivors of childhood cancer (n = 228, mean attained age = 14.5 years [range = 4.7-21 years]; mean diagnosis age = 4.4 years [range = 0-16.5 years]; mean time off treatment = 8.7 years [range = 2.8-19.3 years]) seen in a Long-Term Survivor Clinic (LTSC) completed questionnaires at each clinic visit detailing their current health. FCR was measured with a single item. Data from questionnaires from 2011 to 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Descriptive statistics and a random effects model were used to address study aims. RESULTS: FCR was reported in 43% (n = 98) of survivors at least once across all clinic visits. Among survivors reporting FCR at least once, 66% were diagnosed with cancer under the age of 5, and 64% were 13 years or older at their most recent follow-up. Twenty-one percent of survivors (n = 48/224) reported FCR during at least 50% of their visits. Survivors with a higher number of depressive symptoms were more likely to report FCR (OR = 1.66, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: FCR is prevalent among survivors of childhood cancer and is related to other health concerns. Research is needed to understand who is at risk and how to.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Medo/psicologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/psicologia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Transtornos Fóbicos/psicologia , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/patologia , Transtornos Fóbicos/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
AIM: As one of the most popular social networking sites in the world, Facebook has strong potential to enable peer support and the user-driven sharing of health information. We carried out a qualitative thematic analysis of the wall posts of a public Facebook group focused on dialysis to identify some of the major themes discussed. METHODS: We searched Facebook using the word 'dialysis'. A Facebook group (Dialysis Discussion Uncensored) with the highest number of members was selected amongst publicly available forums related to dialysis and operated in English (http://www.facebook.com/groups/DialysisUncensored). Two researchers independently extracted information on features of the group including purpose, group members and the user-generated posts on the group wall. Posts were further analysed to develop major themes. RESULTS: Characteristics of a Facebook group based on its participants and activities are presented. Three themes are described with representative quotations. In a period of 2 weeks, we found 1257 wall posts with total of 31 636 likes and 15 972 comments. All messages were in English, and the majority of the participants were dialysis patients. However, we observed the participation of family members and care providers as well. Posts were categorized into three major themes: sharing information, seeking and providing emotional and social support and sharing experience. CONCLUSION: Findings of this study provide an example of how a social networking platform can enable patients and their families to share information and to encourage peer-based support for managing dialysis-related experiences.
Assuntos
Cuidadores/psicologia , Família/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Nefropatias/terapia , Pacientes/psicologia , Diálise Renal , Rede Social , Acesso à Informação , Adaptação Psicológica , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Comunicação , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Emoções , Relações Familiares , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação , Nefropatias/fisiopatologia , Nefropatias/psicologia , Grupo Associado , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Apoio SocialRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess medical and nursing students' intentions to migrate abroad or practice in rural areas. METHODS: We surveyed 3199 first- and final-year medical and nursing students at 16 premier government institutions in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malawi, Nepal, the United Republic of Tanzania and Zambia. The survey contained questions to identify factors that could predict students' intentions to migrate. Primary outcomes were the likelihoods of migrating to work abroad or working in rural areas in the country of training within five years post-training. We assessed predictors of migration intentions using multivariable proportional odds models. FINDINGS: Among respondents, 28% (870/3156) expected to migrate abroad, while only 18% (575/3158) anticipated a rural career. More nursing than medical students desired professions abroad (odds ratio, OR: 1.76; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.25-2.48). Career desires before matriculation correlated with current intentions for international (OR: 4.49; 95% CI: 3.21-6.29) and rural (OR: 4.84; 95% CI: 3.52-6.66) careers. Time spent in rural areas before matriculation predicted the preference for a rural career (20 versus 0 years: OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.19-1.98) and against work abroad (20 versus 0 years: OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50-0.96). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of students surveyed still intend to work abroad or in cities after training. These intentions could be identified even before matriculation. Admissions standards that account for years spent in rural areas could promote greater graduate retention in the country of training and in rural areas.
Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Emigração e Imigração , Intenção , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Estudantes de Enfermagem/psicologia , Adulto , África Subsaariana , Sudeste Asiático , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Single room maternity care (SRMC) includes all aspects of the birth process (labour, delivery, postpartum) in a single room with a consistent team of healthcare providers. Traditional maternity care (TMC) involves having mothers labouring and delivering their baby in one room and then transferring to a room on another unit, which also means a transition in providers. Although many hospitals have transitioned to SRMC, there has been limited evidence to support their development. METHODS: This study was conducted in two large hospitals (one offering SRMC, the other TMC) in Western Canada. A cross-sectional between-subjects design was used to compare differences between SRMC and TMC. New mothers were asked to complete validated questionnaires. Health information was collected from administrative and health databases. The main outcomes included readiness for hospital discharge, mothers' satisfaction, newborn length of stay, and mother length of stay. Several covariates were examined. RESULTS: In total, 506 (292 SRMC; 214 TMC) mothers participated. Readiness for discharge and maternal satisfaction were significantly higher in SRMC. Although newborn and mother length of stay were significantly reduced in SRMC compared to TMC for univariate tests, mother length of stay was not significantly different when adjusting for other variables. CONCLUSIONS: There are positive health and psychosocial outcomes for mothers and newborns in the SRMC model of care compared to TMC. Since readiness for discharge and satisfaction are associated with positive maternal-infant interactions and transitions to community, SRMC could be the better approach. Further research should examine healthcare provider outcomes and implementation costs.
Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Materna , Mães , Lactente , Humanos , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Mães/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Alta do Paciente , Satisfação Pessoal , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de SaúdeRESUMO
Preterm infants are at increased risk for developmental delays. Family integrated care (FICare) is a novel care delivery model that integrates parents into their infant's care in the neonatal intensive care unit. Two follow-up studies are presented to identify effects of Alberta FICare™ on the development of preterm infants born between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation. Data for Study 1 were collected at an age of 2 months, and between 6 and 24 months for Study 2. In Study 1, Ages and Stages Questionnaires (ASQ) and maternal psychosocial distress measures were completed by 330 mothers of 387 infants (FICare, n = 223; standard care, n = 164). Study 2 utilised an additional measure, the Parent-Child Interaction Teaching Scale, with 50 mothers of 61 infants (FICare, n = 30; standard care, n = 31). For Study 1, there was no effect of Alberta FICare™ on the ASQ domains of communication, problem solving, or personal-social at an age of 2 months. For Study 2, the risk of communication delay was significantly lower for infants in Alberta FICare™ compared with standard care. Results from Study 2 suggest a possible protective effect of Alberta FICare™ for the risk of communication delays between 6 and 24 months. Further investigation into the effect of Alberta FICare™ on parent-child interactions and implications for long-term development is warranted.
RESUMO
Objective: Among a prospective sample of Canadian university students, this study aimed to: 1) document changes in cannabis use and perceived harmfulness of use before and after the legalization of recreational cannabis; 2) examine correlates of perceived harmfulness; and 3) explore changes in perceived harmfulness as a function of cannabis use patterns. Method: A random sample of 871 students at one western Canadian university were assessed pre- and post-legalization of recreational cannabis. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to explore changes in cannabis use and perceived harmfulness. A random effects model was developed to assess whether cannabis legalization was associated with perceptions of harmfulness of regular cannabis use. Results: Twenty-six percent of the sample used cannabis during the past three months at both timepoints. The majority of the sample perceived regular cannabis use as a high-risk behaviour at each timepoint (57.3% and 60.9%, respectively). Results from the random effects model showed that after controlling for covariates, cannabis legalization was not associated with changes in perceived harmfulness. Perceptions of harm remained relatively stable regardless of cannabis use pattern. Respondents who endorsed cannabis use at both timepoints reported a significant increase in their frequency of cannabis use post-legalization. Conclusions: Legalization of cannabis for recreational use was not associated with substantive changes in perceptions of harm among post-secondary students, yet it might lead to increases in cannabis use among those who already use the substance. Ongoing monitoring of policies is needed, as are targeted public health initiatives to identify post-secondary students who are at risk for cannabis-related consequences.
RESUMO
We report on qualitative findings from a mixed methods study, examining enacted and internalized stigma during mandatory HIV screening among immigration applicants living with HIV in Canada. Qualitative findings show alignment with characteristics of internalized HIV stigma. We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews, and analyzed the data through thematic analysis, using Intersectionality and the Internalized HIV Stigma Scale as our theoretical and analytical frameworks. Participants described experiences of enacted and internalized HIV stigma in ways that were consistent with the four main domains of stereotypes, disclosure concerns, social relationships, and self-acceptance, but also extended the description of HIV stigma beyond these domains. Experiences of internalized HIV stigma and enacted stigma during the Canadian Immigration Medical Examination could potentially influence individuals' long-term engagement in the HIV care cascade during the process of migration to, and settlement in, Canada. We present recommendations for the broader migrant health research agenda, health and social care providers, and public health policies.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This population-based retrospective study compares the efficacy of cisplatin (cis-RT) vs cetuximab (cetux-RT) with concurrent radiation as definitive treatment in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC). METHODS: Patients with OPC treated in Alberta with cis-RT or cetux-RT between 2006 and 2016 were evaluated. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was completed with a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Among 546 patients with OPC, 431 (78.9%) received cis-RT and 115 (21.1%) cetux-RT. Patients treated with cetux-RT were more likely to develop a recurrence after treatment compared to cis-RT (25% vs 15%, P = .01). On MVA, current smoking, human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative status, higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), T-stage, and cetux-RT predicted for worse DFS and OS. Outcomes in older patients with a higher CCI still favored cis-RT. CONCLUSIONS: Our data reaffirm results from randomized studies showing better survival outcomes with cis-RT compared to cetux-RT even among those who are >65 with CCI ≥3.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Idoso , Alberta , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Cetuximab , Quimiorradioterapia , Cisplatino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Survivors of childhood cancer experience late effects as a result of their cancer treatment. Evidence for the prevalence of pain as a late effect has been equivocal. This study aimed to describe the prevalence and patterns of pain and biospsychosocial variables that may be related to pain in this population. METHOD: Survivors of childhood cancer (n = 299; 52.5% male; median age = 16.1[4.6-32.6] years; years off therapy = 9.1[2.0-23.7]) were included. Survivors completed a health assessment questionnaire as part of their long-term survivor clinic appointment (median = 3.0 appointments, range = 1.0-7.0) annually or biannually between 2014 and 2017 (Time 1-Time 4). Prevalence of pain was examined and latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify patterns of pain based on longitudinal reports of pain. Binary logistic regression examined biopsychosocial variables at Time 1 (T1) associated with class membership. RESULTS: Forty-seven percent of survivors reported pain during at least one clinic visit. Headaches were the most prevalent type of pain (26.4%). Survivors of Wilms' Tumor and Ewing's Sarcoma reported the highest prevalence of pain (51.5% and 50.0%, respectively). LCA revealed two clinically relevant profiles: "infrequent or no pain" (74.3%) and "persistent pain" (25.7%). Logistic regression showed that female sex (odds ratio, OR = 2.69, 95% confidence interval, CI [.99, 7.31]), depressive symptomatology at T1 (OR = 2.27, 95% CI [1.31, 3.94]), and drinking to intoxication at T1 (OR = 3.07, 95% CI [1.03, 9.15]), were related to persistent pain. CONCLUSION: Pain is prevalent among survivors of childhood cancer. Future research should characterize the experience of pain in this population so interventions may be developed. Assessment of pain during regular long-term follow-up appointments is warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer , Neoplasias , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Dor/epidemiologia , Prevalência , SobreviventesRESUMO
Central venous access devices (CVADs) are the standard of care in pediatric oncology. Occlusion is a common complication that can lead to delays in therapy, readmission, and CVAD removal and reinsertion. Early treatment of partial occlusions using a standardized protocol may restore patency and increase life span of CVADs. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a nurse-led protocol to manage partial CVAD occlusions in pediatric oncology and autologous bone marrow transplant patients. The protocol enabled nurses to manage partially occluded CVADs by administering thrombolytic therapy following an algorithm and patient-specific standing order. The primary outcome was time from recognition of the partial occlusion to instillation of a thrombolytic. Secondary outcomes were thrombolytic dwell time, number of complete occlusions, and CVAD life span. We used a quasi-experimental, after-only, nonequivalent control group design to compare patients not exposed (retrospective cohort, n = 137) and patients exposed (prospective cohort, n = 101) to the nurse-led protocol. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare time to treatment, dwell time, and CVAD life span between cohorts, and χ2 was used to compare the proportion of occlusions classified as complete. Time to treatment was significantly lower in the prospective cohort (M = 99.9 minutes) versus the retrospective cohort (M = 483.7 minutes), U = 1366.50, p < .01, as was thrombolytic dwell time, U = 282.50, p < .01. Proportion of complete occlusions and CVAD life span did not differ between cohorts. The nurse-led protocol was effective to manage partial CVAD occlusions in pediatric oncology patients.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/enfermagem , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/normas , Neoplasias/terapia , Enfermagem Oncológica/normas , Pediatria/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Tempo para o Tratamento/normas , Adulto , Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentação , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Families play a critical role in supporting adolescents with substance use disorders. Little research has been done to investigate interventions targeting the significant stress of caring for an adolescent with problematic substance use and its subsequent impact on self-compassion in families. The aim of this pilot study was to trial an 8-week Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program as a post treatment aftercare intervention among female caregivers of youth with substance use disorders. Forty-three female caregivers were recruited and randomly assigned to either a treatment (n = 21) or a waitlist control group (n = 22). Participants completed surveys pre/post-intervention to assess perceived stress and self-compassion. Qualitative interviews at post-intervention were designed to explore participants' perceptions and experiences of the MBSR program. Five main themes captured the participants' experience: improved self-compassion, increased capacity to manage stress, enhanced interpersonal effectiveness, improved overall physical wellness, and benefits of attending the program with women who have shared experience. Overall, this pilot MBSR program was found to significantly enhance the participants' sense of well-being through reducing their perceived stress and increasing self-compassion. These findings show promise that MBSR may be an effective intervention for caregivers of youth with substance use disorders.
Assuntos
Cuidadores/psicologia , Atenção Plena/métodos , Mães/psicologia , Estresse Psicológico/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá , Empatia , Feminino , Humanos , Relações Interpessoais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Autocuidado , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In this mixed-methods pilot study, we examined the intersections of the current Canadian immigration policy, mandatory HIV screening during the Immigration Medical Exam (IME) and enacted and internalized stigma for HIV-positive immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) in a western Canadian province. We focus on qualitative findings from this study. METHODS: Using the Internalized HIV Stigma Scale (IHSS), we collected data from eight immigrants from SSA living with HIV in a western Canadian province. We then conducted semistructured interviews with seven of the eight participants. Due to the small sample size, survey data were summarized using descriptive analysis. Qualitative data were analyzed through constant comparative analysis. RESULTS: The following key themes emerged from analysis of qualitative data: experiences of HIV-related emotional distress during the IME; varied experiences of HIV testing during the IME; and inconsistent patterns of linkage to medical care, psychosocial supports and engagement in the HIV care cascade. CONCLUSION: Findings from this pilot study cannot be generalized to the broader population of immigrants living with HIV in Canada. However, we found that the experiences of internalized HIV stigma and enacted stigma during the IME potentially influence the long-term engagement in the HIV care cascade during the process of migration and settlement in Canada. Further study in this population is recommended to examine the intersections of current mandatory HIV screening process during the Canadian immigration process, migration, settlement, culture, stigma and engagement in the HIV care cascade.
Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes/psicologia , Infecções por HIV , Testes Obrigatórios , Angústia Psicológica , Estigma Social , Adulto , África Subsaariana/epidemiologia , Canadá/etnologia , Emigração e Imigração , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Testes Obrigatórios/ética , Testes Obrigatórios/métodos , Saúde Mental , Determinantes Sociais da SaúdeRESUMO
This study aimed to broaden previous investigations of correlates of lifetime cannabis use and problematic cannabis use among post-secondary students by examining the novel and contemporary issues of medicinal use and deep inhalation practices. The sample included 2212 undergraduate and graduate post-secondary students from Alberta, Canada, who completed the University of Calgary's Campus Experience with Cannabis Survey (average age 23.2, SDâ¯=â¯5.2). Nine variables were entered into the binary logistic regression to examine their differentiation of lifetime users from non-users. A multiple regression model was completed with past six-month users (nâ¯=â¯697), where the continuous dependent variable was cannabis use severity as measured by total scores on the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test-Revised. Twenty independent variables were entered simultaneously. Varsity athlete status, family mental illness, severity of alcohol use, greater support for legalization and lower perceived risk associated with regular cannabis use, differentiated lifetime users from non-users. Higher rates of religiosity and living with parents or relatives were associated with lower-lifetime rates. Male gender, earlier age of first cannabis use, cannabis use motives (including coping, enhancement and expansion), past six-month medicinal use and increased frequency of deep inhalation during consumption, were found to be significant correlates of severity. Different factors seem to predict lifetime cannabis use versus severity, and these differences may help inform the development and delivery of prevention efforts. Given that medicinal use and male gender were the largest correlates of severity, populations representing these groups may benefit most from targeted education and prevention.
Assuntos
Abuso de Maconha/epidemiologia , Fumar Maconha/epidemiologia , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Estudantes , Universidades , Adolescente , Adulto , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Abuso de Maconha/psicologia , Fumar Maconha/psicologia , Uso da Maconha/epidemiologia , Uso da Maconha/psicologia , Motivação , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION Japan is a developed country with high use of Internet and online platforms for health information. 'Yahoo! Answer Japan' is the most commonly used question-and-answer service in Japan. AIM To explore the information users seek regarding breast cancer from the 'Yahoo! Answer Japan' web portal. METHODS The 'Yahoo! Answer Japan' portal was searched for the key word 'breast cancer' and all questions searched for the period of 1 January to 31 December 2014 were obtained. The selected questions related to human breast cancer and were not advertisements or promotional material. The questions were categorized using a coding schema. High and low access of the questions were defined by the number of view-counts. RESULTS Among the 2392 selected questions, six major categories were identified; (1) suspected breast cancer, (2) breast cancer screening, (3) treatment of breast cancer, (4) life with breast cancer, (5) prevention of breast cancer and (6) others. The highest number of questions were treatment related (28.8%) followed by suspected breast cancer-related questions (23.4%) and screening-related questions (20%). Statistical analysis revealed that the treatment-related questions were more likely to be highly accessed. CONCLUSION Content analysis of Internet question-answer communities is important, as questions posted on these sites would serve as a rich source of direct reflection regarding the health-related information needs of the general population.
Assuntos
Acesso à Informação , Neoplasias da Mama , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor , Internet , Feminino , Humanos , JapãoRESUMO
AbstractWe sought to identify independent, nonacademic predictors of medical and nursing student intent to migrate abroad or from rural to urban areas after graduation in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). This was a cross-sectional survey of 3,199 first- and final-year medical and nursing students at 16 training institutions in eight LMIC. Questionnaires assessed demographics, career intentions, and preferences regarding selected career, location, and work-related attributes. Using principal component analysis, student preferences were reduced into four discrete categories of priorities: 1) work environment resources, 2) location livability, 3) altruistic job values, and 4) individualistic job values. Students' preferences were scored in each category. Using students' characteristics and priority scores, multivariable proportional odds models were used to derive independent predictors of intentions to emigrate for work outside the country, or to work in a rural area in their native country. Students prioritizing individualistic values more often planned international careers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-1.78), whereas those prioritizing altruistic values preferred rural careers (aOR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.50-2.21). Trainees prioritizing high-resource environments preferentially planned careers abroad (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.12-1.69) and were unlikely to seek rural work (aOR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.49-0.73). Independent of their priorities, students with prolonged prior rural residence were unlikely to plan emigration (aOR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.50-0.90) and were more likely to plan a rural career (aOR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.16-2.03). We conclude that use of nonacademic attributes in medical and nursing admissions processes would likely increase retention in high-need rural areas and reduce emigration "brain drain" in LMIC.
Assuntos
Escolha da Profissão , Emigração e Imigração , Intenção , Serviços de Saúde Rural , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Estudantes de Enfermagem/psicologia , Adulto , África , Ásia , Estudos Transversais , Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Análise de Componente Principal , Inquéritos e Questionários , Recursos Humanos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological estimate lifetime risk (LTR) is a measure that expresses the probability of disease in the remaining lifetime for individuals of a specific index age. These estimates can be useful for general audience targeted knowledge translation activities against diabetes. There are only a few reports on lifetime of impact of diabetes on coronary heart disease (CHD) events. METHODS: The Suita Study, a cohort study of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), was established in 1989. We included all participants who were CVD free at baseline. Age (in years) was used as the time scale. Age-specific incidence rates were calculated with person-year method within ten-year bands. We estimated the sex and index-age specific LTR of first-ever CHD with taking the competing risk of death into account. RESULTS: We followed 5559 participants without CHD history during 1989-2007 for 71,745.4 person-years. At age 40 years the competing risk of death adjusted LTR for all CHD were 16.61% for men without diabetes and 21.06% for men with diabetes. Therefore the LTD for CHD was higher by 4.45% for men with diabetes compared to men without. The competing risk adjusted LTR of CHD at 40 years of aged women was 9.18% for without diabetes and 14.21% for with diabetes. This increased LTR of CHD for diabetic patients were observed among both men and women across all index ages. CONCLUSION: In this urban community based population we observed that diabetes has significant effect on the residual LTR of CHD among both men and women of middle age. This easy understandable knowledge can be used as important indexes to assist public health education and planning.