Medium-term outcomes of the S-ROM modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to analyse results achieved with the S-ROM modular stem in revision surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted from 2007 to 2015 including 51 patients who had a follow-up of ≥ 2 years and complete medical history. The mean age was 66.5 years old (34-87). The main reason for revision was aseptic loosening (38 cases, 74.5%), followed by infection (10, 19.6%), instability (2, 3.9%) and an adverse reaction associated with a metal-on-metal hip implant (1, 2%). Using the Paprosky classification, there were 22 cases of type I (43.1%), 27 of type II (52.9%) and 2 of type IIIA (4%). At the end of the follow-up, radiological parameters were assessed using Engh's criteria. Pre- and postoperative clinical status was assessed using the Harris Hip Score, a visual analogue scale and the Merle D'Aubigné score. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 5.7 years (2-10). The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 45.5 points (22-65) to 85.8 (55-100) (p < 0.001), and the final mean Merle D'Aubigné scores were 5.2, 4.6 and 5.6 for pain, ability to walk and mobility, respectively. Osseointegration was confirmed in all except one patient with fibrous non-union. No aseptic loosening has been recorded. Postoperative complications were deep infection in four cases (7.8%) and dislocation in three (5.9%). CONCLUSION: This study indicates good medium-term outcomes using a modular hip replacement system with porous-coated proximal sleeves in revision surgery in patients with Paprosky type I and II defects.

Complications and hospital admission in the following 90 days after lung cryobiopsy performed in interstitial lung disease.

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) is an emerging technique for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD), but its risk benefit ratio has been questioned. The objectives of this research were to describe any adverse events that occur within 90 days following TBLC and to identify clinical predictors that could help to detect the population at risk. METHODS: We conducted an ambispective study including all patients with suspected ILD who underwent TBLC. Data were collected concerning the safety profile of this procedure and compared to various clinical variables. RESULTS: Overall, 257 TBLCs were analysed. Complications were observed in 15.2% of patients; nonetheless, only 5.4% of all patients required hospital admission on the day of the procedure. In the 30 and 90 days following the TBLC, rates of readmission were 1.3% and 3.5% and of mortality were 0.38%, and 0.78% respectively. Two models were built to predict early admission (AUC 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.84) and overall admission (AUC 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.85). CONCLUSIONS: Within 90 days after TBLC, 8.9% of patients suffered a complication serious enough to warrant hospital admission. Modified MRC dyspnoea score ≥2, FVC<50%, and a Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥2 were factors that predicted early and overall admission.

Prevalence of symptoms of knee or hip joints in older adults from the general population.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prevalence of knee and hip symptoms varies from study to study, or is unknown. The goals of this study were to determine the prevalence of these symptoms, of diagnosed osteoarthritis and the use of prostheses, by age and gender, in a sample of the general older population. METHODS: We mailed a questionnaire to 11,002 people aged 60 to 90 years who were selected by stratified random sampling. The questionnaire included questions on pain, functional limitations, diagnosed osteoarthritis, previous operations on either or both joints, and sociodemographic data. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: From 10,150 people who fulfilled the selection criteria, 74.6% answered the questionnaire. Up to 49.2% of the subjects reported pain in either knee or hip or both, with pain in the knee reported more frequently (38.3%) than the hip (23.8%). Functional limitations were present in 51.6% of respondents, with 42.5% having limitations in the knees and 27.7% in the hips. The symptoms increased with age and were more prevalent in women. About 6.6% of respondents reported that they had already had prosthesis implant (hip 3.9%; knee 2.6%). The presence of a hip prosthesis was slightly lower in women than in men and more women had a knee prosthesis. Physicians had already diagnosed osteoarthritis in 38.5% of the sample, 19.4% of the hip and 31% of the knee. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of pain symptoms is relatively high among older people, more often in the knee and, in both joints, more often in women, but the rate of prosthetic surgeries was low, which means that additional studies are necessary to gain insight into the healthcare needs of the population.