Hospital pharmacy acquisition of nonstocked antimicrobials-current processes and areas for improvement.

BACKGROUND: The delivery of prompt and appropriate antimicrobial therapy for life-threatening infections is an important antimicrobial stewardship measure and a priority for hospitals. OBJECTIVES: To better understand U.S. hospital pharmacy stocking processes and acquisition of nonstocked antimicrobials and to identify strategies for improving this process. METHODS: This mixed-methods study recruited infectious diseases and antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists. Semistructured interviews with pharmacists in Minnesota were conducted via video conferencing software from January 21, 2021, to March 17, 2021. Audio recordings of the interviews guided survey development and were also transcribed, coded, and qualitatively analyzed. Surveys were distributed throughout the United States via an e-mail listserv, and responses were collected between August 5, 2021, and September 15, 2021. RESULTS: Ten interviews and 78 surveys were included in the analysis. Formulary and stocking practices varied based on institution. Stocking decisions were most frequently based on the frequency of use, clinical utility, and cost of antimicrobials. Nonstocked antimicrobials were often ordered from the wholesale distributor but, if needed urgently, acquired from another local institution. Antibacterial agents were the most frequently needed nonstocked antimicrobials, especially those targeting multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria. When acquiring nonstocked antimicrobials, barriers include process inefficiencies, cost, availability, and safety concerns. Improved information sharing between local institutions may help improve this process. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory study, antimicrobial stocking practices varied within U.S. hospitals. Acquisition of nonstocked, urgently needed antimicrobials from neighboring hospitals may be common; however, this process lacks guidance and is often inefficient. Establishing better mechanisms for information sharing may improve this process and should be explored.

Correction: Adema et al. Heartbreaking Decisions: The Dogma and Uncertainties of Antimicrobial Therapy in Infective Endocarditis. Pathogens 2023, 12, 703.

There was an error in the original publication [...].

A Multicenter, Retrospective Outcome Analysis of Vancomycin Area Under the Curve versus Trough-Based Dosing Strategies in Patients with Burn OR Inhalational Injuries (MONITOR).

Vancomycin is a glycopeptide antibiotic that requires close therapeutic monitoring. Prolonged exposure to elevated concentrations increases risk for serious adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity. However, sub-therapeutic concentrations may lead to bacterial resistance and clinical failure or death. The most recent Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) publication regarding therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin recommends utilizing area under the curve (AUC)-based monitoring to maximize clinical success. Despite the guideline recommendation for AUC-guided dosing, many institutions still use trough-only monitoring in their practices, including those caring for patients with acute burn injuries. Following burn injury, patients are at a higher risk for infections, multi-organ failure, and pharmacokinetic alterations. The primary objective of this multi-center retrospective study is to determine optimal therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin by comparing clinical success between AUC vs. trough-based monitoring in burn patients. MONITOR was a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with thermal or inhalation injury admitted to one of 13 burn centers from 1/1/17 to 8/31/22 who received vancomycin. Demographic and clinical course data, including acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence and clinical success were obtained. Patients were evaluated for clinical success and grouped according to method of monitoring and adjusting doses: AUC vs. trough-based monitoring. Clinical success was a composite definition and lack of meeting any 1 of 5 criteria: 1) persistent infection, 2) relapse, 3) antibiotic failure (clinical worsening), 4) AKI, 5) death. Five-hundred seventeen vancomycin courses were assessed from 485 patients. There was no difference in the rate of clinical success between AUC monitored and the trough-only monitored groups. Incidence of AKI was higher in the trough-only group; however, was not statistically significant after controlling for renal function on admission, past medical history of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and concomitant nephrotoxins.

Implementation and Outcomes of an Empiric Ivermectin Strongyloides Treatment Protocol for Patients Receiving High-Dose Corticosteroids for Severe COVID-19.

Strongyloides stercoralis is a parasitic roundworm that is present worldwide and can cause lifelong, often asymptomatic, infection. Immunosuppression, particularly by corticosteroids, is a risk factor for hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated strongyloidiasis-severe disease states that can lead to septic shock and death. Our institution implemented a strongyloidiasis screening and empiric ivermectin treatment protocol for inpatients receiving high-dose corticosteroids for severe COVID-19. Among 487 COVID-19 admissions treated with high-dose corticosteroids from June 10, 2020 to March 31, 2021, 61% of those with demographics at risk for Strongyloides exposure were screened for Strongyloides and treated empirically with ivermectin. Adherence to the protocol declined over time during the study period. The empiric ivermectin protocol appeared safe, but more research is needed to determine the effect on hyperinfection and/or disseminated strongyloidiasis risk and mortality rate, as well as to improve institutional adherence to the protocol.

Heartbreaking Decisions: The Dogma and Uncertainties of Antimicrobial Therapy in Infective Endocarditis.

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but increasingly prevalent disease with high morbidity and mortality, requiring antimicrobials and at times surgical intervention. Through the decades of healthcare professionals' experience with managing IE, certain dogmas and uncertainties have arisen around its pharmacotherapy. The introduction of new antimicrobials and novel combinations are exciting developments but also further complicate IE treatment choices. In this review, we provide and evaluate the relevant evidence focused around contemporary debates in IE treatment pharmacotherapy, including beta-lactam choice in MSSA IE, combination therapies (aminoglycosides, ceftaroline), the use of oral antimicrobials, the role of rifamycins, and long-acting lipoglycopeptides.

Ventilatory Parameters Measured After One Week of Mechanical Ventilation and Survival in COVID-19-Related ARDS.

BACKGROUND: Ventilatory parameters measured soon after initiation of mechanical ventilation have limited ability to predict outcome of COVID-19-related ARDS. We hypothesized that ventilatory parameters measured after one week of mechanical ventilation might differ between survivors and non-survivors. METHODS: One hundred twenty-seven subjects with COVID-related ARDS had gas exchange and lung mechanics assessed on the day of intubation and one week later. The main parameters of interest were PaO2 /FIO2 , ventilatory ratio (VR), respiratory system compliance (CRS), and a composite score that was calculated as (PaO2 /FIO2 /100) × CRS/VR. The primary outcome was death in the ICU. RESULTS: Of the 127 subjects, 42 (33%) died in the ICU and 85 (67%) were successfully extubated. On the day of intubation, PaO2 /FIO2 , CRS, and composite score of survivors and non-survivors were similar, but survivors had a lower VR. At one week, as compared to survivors, non-survivors had a significantly higher VR (2.04 ± 0.76 vs 1.60 ± 0.43, P < .001), lower CRS (27.4 ± 6.4 mL/cm H2O vs 32.4 ± 9.3 mL/cm H2O, P = .002), and lower composite score (20.6 ± 11.9 vs 34.5 ± 18.6, P < .001), with no statistically significant difference in PaO2 /FIO2 (137 ± 49 vs 155 ± 48, P = .08). CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with COVID ARDS, parameters that reflect dead space (VR), lung mechanics (CRS), and a combined score that included PaO2 /FIO2 , VR, and CRS differed between survivors and non-survivors after one week of mechanical ventilation but with considerable overlap of values between survivors and non-survivors.

Oritavancin for the treatment of complicated gram-positive infection in persons who inject drugs.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of complicated infections in persons who inject drugs (PWID) and patients experiencing homelessness poses a unique challenge to clinicians. Long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotics, such as oritavancin, may facilitate extended courses of outpatient intravenous therapy while avoiding the need for central lines, improving compliance and thus increasing the chance of clinical cure. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adult PWID who received at least one dose of oritavancin for a gram-positive infection between 1/1/17 and 6/30/19 at a large safety net hospital. RESULTS: Twenty three PWID received 24 courses of at least one dose of oritavancin for a gram-positive infection; 16 were experiencing homelessness at the time of diagnosis. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the most common infecting pathogen and bone or joint the most frequent infection site. Nineteen encounters resulted in clinical cure, including 5 whose conditions improved despite non-adherence to their prescribed regimen. Three patients experienced a non-favorable outcome. Two patients experienced mild adverse drug reactions that did not interfere with therapy; no patients died while on therapy. CONCLUSION: Oritavancin may be a clinically effective treatment option for the management of complicated gram-positive infections in PWID and patients experiencing homelessness. Further studies should be performed to validate these results.

Successful Treatment of Recalcitrant Mpox Lesions With Intralesional Cidofovir in a Patient With HIV/AIDS.

This case report describes a man in his 50s with HIV/AIDS who presented with widely scattered recalcitrant mpox lesions.

Conflicts of Interest Among Infectious Diseases Clinical Practice Guideline Authors and the Pharmaceutical Industry.

This cross-sectional study assesses the prevalence of conflicts of interest (COI) associated with guideline-recommended drugs among Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline authors and compliance with the Council on Medical Specialty Societies and Institute of Medicine guidelines.