Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 36(2): 151-156, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31645075

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: After mastectomy and breast reconstruction, many patients experience upper extremity complications, such as pain, restriction in motion, and lymphedema. Despite an aesthetically satisfactory outcome, these occurrences can diminish a patient's postoperative quality of life. Several studies have investigated the causes and incidence of these complications. However, there is currently a paucity of data comparing postoperative upper extremity function according to reconstruction technique. METHODS: A review was performed of patients enrolled in a physical therapy (PT) program after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. PT initial encounter evaluations were used to gather data on patients' postoperative upper extremity function. Hospital records were used to gather surgical and demographic data. For each patient, data were collected for each upper extremity that was ipsilateral to a reconstructed breast. Data were then compared between patients who underwent implant-based versus autologous deep inferior epigastric perforator flap reconstruction. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were identified, including 39 autologous and 33 implant-based reconstruction cases. Proportions of patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsies and axillary lymph node dissections were similar between the two groups. The autologous-based reconstruction patients had significantly higher arm pain at rest (p = 0.004) and with activity (p = 0.031) compared with implant patients. Shoulder range of motion and manual muscle test results were similar between groups, with the exception of elbow flexion, which was weaker in implant patients (p = 0.030). Implant patients were also more likely to report "severe difficulty" or "inability" to perform activities of daily living (p = 0.022). Edema/swelling, axillary cording, and lymphedema girth measurements were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Different techniques of breast reconstruction can result in different postoperative upper extremity complications. These data show specific areas where postoperative care and PT can be customized according to reconstruction type. Investigation is currently underway to determine the effect of PT on upper extremity function in these patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamoplastia , Atividades Cotidianas , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Mastectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Qualidade de Vida , Extremidade Superior/cirurgia
2.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 33(11): 570-580, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33065678

RESUMO

GENERAL PURPOSE: To present a comprehensive review of lymphedema, including its pathophysiology, assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Summarize the etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical manifestations of lymphedema.2. Describe the diagnostic and treatment approaches for patients who have lymphedema. ABSTRACT: Lymphedema is a condition characterized by localized protein-rich swelling caused by damaged or malfunctioning lymphatics. Patients with lymphedema have an increased risk of infection because of the lymphostatic nature of the disease. Chronic ulceration of the skin can make individuals vulnerable to infection leading to serious, sometimes fatal, complications. Proper diagnosis and treatment modalities can aid in the prevention of these complications and ensure better outcomes for the patient.


Lymphedema is a condition characterized by localized protein-rich swelling caused by damaged or malfunctioning lymphatics. Patients with lymphedema have an increased risk of infection because of the lymphostatic nature of the disease. Chronic ulceration of the skin can make individuals vulnerable to infection leading to serious, sometimes fatal, complications. Proper diagnosis and treatment modalities can aid in the prevention of these complications and ensure better outcomes for the patient.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Capacitação em Serviço , Linfedema/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfedema/terapia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Linfedema/fisiopatologia , Exame Físico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA