Assessment of Exocrine Pancreatic Function Following Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery: a Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) can be seen after bariatric/metabolic surgery. Fecal elastase level is a simple test in diagnosing and grading EPI. Quality of life changes in patients with bariatric/metabolic surgery related to gastrointestinal complaints is debated. AIM: This study aimed to investigate rates and grades of EPI via fecal elastase levels and association between EPI and quality of life in bariatric surgery patients. METHODS: A prospective study was performed for patients with bariatric/metabolic surgery at their second-year follow-up. Fecal elastase levels were used to diagnose and grade EPI as severe or moderate. Patient's gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI) was calculated. Patients were grouped as sleeve gastrectomy (SG), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI), and transit bipartition (TB). Rates of severe or moderate EPI were primary outcome. Secondary outcome was an association between fecal elastase and GIQLI. RESULTS: There were 17, 29, 21, and 15 patients in OAGB, SG, TB, and SASI groups. There was no significant difference between groups in GIQLI scores and fecal elastase levels (p = 0.152 and p = 0.361). Rates of patients with moderate EPI in the groups OAGB, SG, TB, and SASI were 23.5%, 17.2%, 14.3%, and 20.0%. GIQLI scores were not significantly correlated with age, postoperative morphometric data, and fecal elastase values (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Rates of patients with moderate EPI ranged from 14.3 to 23.5% at second-year follow-up. There was no patient with severe EPI. GIQLI scores were not significantly correlated with fecal elastase levels and different types of bariatric/metabolic surgery.

A new risk scoring system for early prediction of surgical need in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction: a single-center retrospective clinical study.

Purpose: Cases of adhesive small bowel obstruction are a nuisance to surgeons. There have been years of ongoing discussions, and various guidelines have been published for the management of this disease. Both surgical and conservative approaches can have their own complications. It is often difficult to decide which treatment to apply to which patient. We aimed to create a multiparametric scoring system for the optimal management of adhesive small bowel obstruction patients. Methods: The retrospective laboratory, clinical and radiological records of 100 patients who were hospitalized and followed-up/treated for adhesive small bowel obstruction secondary to surgery in the General Surgery Clinic of Haydarpasa Numune Education and Research Hospital (Istanbul) between 2011 and 2021 were reviewed and statistically analyzed. Results: Admittance CRP and the largest diameter of the small intestine in the horizontal section of the admittance CT scans were significantly higher (P = 0.006 and P = 0.007), and the admittance albumin and sodium values were significantly lower (P < 0.001 and P = 0.031) in patients operated on for adhesive small bowel obstruction than in patients not operated on. Free intraperitoneal fluid in CT scans was detected at a higher rate in the operated group. An adhesive small bowel obstruction surgery score above 3.5 points out of 7 was found to be significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: With this easy and applicable scoring system, complications of existing disease may be avoided by considering earlier surgical intervention in patients with a score of 4 and above.