Storage Conditions of Conjugated Reagents Can Impact Results of Immunogenicity Assays.

Consistent performance of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays through all stages of clinical development is critical for the assessment of immunogenicity and interpretation of PK, PD, safety, and efficacy. The electrochemiluminescent assays commonly employed for ADA measurement use drug conjugated with ruthenium and biotin to bind ADA in samples. Here we report an association between high nonspecific ADA responses in certain drug-naïve individuals and the storage buffer of the conjugated reagents used in a monoclonal antibody ADA assay. Ruthenylated reagents stored in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer had increased levels of aggregate and produced variable and high baseline responses in some subjects. Reagents stored in a histidine-sucrose buffer (HSB) had lower aggregate levels and produced low sample responses. In contrast to PBS, conjugated reagents formulated in HSB remained low in aggregate content and in sample response variability after 5 freeze/thaw cycles. A reagent monitoring control (RMC) serum was prepared for the real-time evaluation of conjugated reagent quality. Using appropriate buffers for storage of conjugated reagents together with RMCs capable of monitoring of reagent aggregation status can help ensure consistent, long-term performance of ADA methods.

Correlation of screening and confirmatory results in tiered immunogenicity testing by solution-phase bridging assays.

Biotherapeutic proteins induce undesired immune responses that can affect drug efficacy and safety. For this reason, immunogenicity assessment is an integral part of drug development and is mandated by the regulatory authorities. Immunogenicity is typically evaluated by a tiered approach consisting of a screening assay followed by a competitive inhibition with unlabeled drug serving as confirmatory assay and additional characterization of the immune response. The confirmatory assay is intended to reduce the number of false positive responses generated in the screening tier and ensure that all samples are correctly classified as positive or negative. The positive-negative sample decisions are based on screening and confirmatory assay cut points that are statistically derived through evaluation of drug-naive samples. In this paper, we describe the analysis of cut point data for the presence of statistical correlation between the screening and confirmatory results. Data were obtained from validations of solution-phase bridging assays for detection of anti-drug antibodies against monoclonal antibody therapeutics. All data sets showed moderate to strong positive correlation, indicating that the screening and confirmatory assays were not independent and were likely to generate similar information. We present theoretical evidence that correlated results may be a general feature of the tiered approach when the same test platform is used for both screening and confirmatory assays. The competitive inhibition test, therefore, may be of limited value beyond reduction of the overall false positive rate. Our results indicate that similar sample results could be obtained by using just the screening assay with the false positive rate set to 1%.