RESUMO
Introduction Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections have high mortality. We aimed to examine the diabetes mellitus (DM) association with CRE mortality. Methodology Our study is a retrospective cohort study including patients who were admitted to the medical wards in the main district hospital (New Jahra Hospital, Kuwait) between January 1, 2022, and January 1, 2023, and diagnosed with CRE infections during hospitalization. The patients were divided into diabetic and non-diabetic groups. Clinical and laboratory data were collected. The presence of carbapenemase genes was detected. The primary outcome was 30-day hospital mortality. We assessed the effect of glycemic control on the outcomes. Results We included 47 patients in the diabetic group and 39 patients in the non-diabetic group. Females represented 54.7% of patients, and the median age was 73 and 55 years in the two groups, respectively. Klebsiella pneumonia (86%) and Escherichia coli (12.8%) were the most frequently isolated CRE. Carbapenemase genes were detected in all patients: NDM-1 in 67.4%, OXA-48 in 18.6%, and both genes coexisted in 14%. The 30-day hospital mortality was significantly higher in the diabetic group compared to the non-diabetic group (48.9% vs. 28.2%, P = 0.041). Among the diabetic patients, there was no significant difference between survivors and non-survivors regarding median glucose or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels (P = 0.465 and 0.932, respectively). Moreover, levels of glucose (odds ratio (OR) 0.928, confidence interval (CI) 0.763-1.13, P = 0.457) and HbA1c (OR 0.89, CI 0.63-1.26, P = 0.507) were not risk factors for increased mortality among diabetic patients. Conclusion We demonstrated the association between DM and increased CRE mortality regardless of the level of glycemic control. This study demonstrates the interaction between communicable and non-communicable diseases.
RESUMO
Melasma, a commonly acquired hyperpigmentation skin condition, is usually treated with topical agents as the first line of management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of azelaic acid versus hydroquinone in treating melasma patients. We conducted a comprehensive search across four online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) from the time of their creation until May 28, 2023. We considered randomized controlled studies comparing hydroquinone with azelaic acid for the treatment of melasma patients. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 to evaluate the risk of bias. The mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and the risk ratio (RR) for categorical variables, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled. Six studies were included, with a total of 673 patients with melasma. The azelaic acid had a lower mean change in melasma area severity index (MASI) than the hydroquinone group [MD= -1.23, 95% CI (-2.05, -0.40), P=0.004]. No difference was observed regarding the improvement via the objective response scale, the reduction in pigmentation, or the adverse events reported. However, despite not being statistically significantly different, there was a trend towards having more good responses in the azelaic acid group. Azelaic acid may be better than hydroquinone in reducing melasma severity (measured by MASI). However, larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate these findings.