First reported cases of actinic folliculitis treated successfully with topical retinoid.

Actinic folliculitis (AF) is a rare recurrent seasonal photodermatosis, relatively newly characterized by nonpruritic, monomorphic pustules and papules appearing 4-24 h after exposure to sunlight. Lesions usually affect the face but also appear on the upper chest and arms. Resolution normally occurs within 7-10 days with cessation of sunlight exposure. AF is resistant to standard treatments used for acne vulgaris and acne rosacea, with only oral retinoids previously being reported as effective. We report the first two cases, to our knowledge, of AF responding extremely effectively to a topical retinoid.

Erythema action spectrum of topical 8-methoxypsoralen-sensitized skin re-evaluated: implications for routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Published methodology used to determine psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) erythemal action spectrum does not reflect current clinical practice for psoralen sensitization. We re-evaluated the PUVA action spectrum using aqueous 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) 2·6 mg L(-1) as used routinely in current clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To determine the UVA erythema action spectrum of topical 8-MOP-sensitized normal skin. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers with skin phototypes I-V were recruited. Forearms were psoralen-sensitized at 37 °C for 10 min. Six UVA irradiations at 10-nm intervals between 325 and 375 nm were randomly allocated to forearm sites and were applied using a 10-nm bandwidth irradiation monochromator. The visual minimal phototoxic dose (MPD) was recorded on each site at 96 h. RESULTS: Volunteer Boston phototypes were: I, n = 2; II, n = 6; III, n = 6; IV, n = 5 and V, n = 1. The mean MPD (J cm(-2) ) for all subjects at each wavelength was as follows: 325 nm, 0·64 (SD 0·37); 335 nm, 0·80 (SD 0·58); 345 nm, 0·96 (SD 0·55); 355 nm, 1·50 (SD 0·85); 365 nm, 2·19 (SD 0·90); and 375 nm, 2·89 (SD 1·06). Therefore, the relative sensitization at each wavelength (erythemal action spectrum) was: 1, 0·83, 0·67, 0·43, 0·29 and 0·22. There were significant differences between the PUVA erythemal effectiveness at different wavelengths but none between skin types. CONCLUSIONS: This study has established the erythemal action spectrum for bath/soak PUVA therapy as is currently performed. In all volunteers, the peak sensitivity was at 325 nm. All volunteers showed a similar trend across the wavelengths studied irrespective of skin type. The determination of the action spectrum for PUVA-induced erythema is important as it permits reliable estimates of erythemal efficacy of any UVA source where the emission spectrum of the lamp is known or can be measured.

Minimal phototoxic dose (MPD) measurements for topical photochemotherapy using a semiautomated MPD tester.

BACKGROUND: The traditional method of assessing minimal phototoxic dose (MPD) prior to photochemotherapy with psoralen-ultraviolet A (PUVA) is inconvenient and cannot directly determine PUVA start doses. A handheld minimal erythema dose UVB tester can be modified by fitting a TL-10 UVA compact fluorescence lamp (CFL). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether MPD testing is possible with a CFL and to calculate a fixed factor to convert observed MPD to PUVA-equivalent MPD. METHODS: Patients had two sets of MPD tests performed on symmetrical, contralateral sites on the lower back. MPD test results from a panel of PUVA lamps were compared with MPD from the modified handheld tester. Additionally, a questionnaire survey was completed by 43 U.K. phototherapy units to assess routine practice concerning MPD testing prior to PUVA therapy. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with psoriasis were recruited. Boston phototypes in the 31 with conclusive MPD reactions were: I, four; II, 11; III, 12; and IV, four. The handheld MPD results were linearly related to the PUVA panel MPD results as follows: PUVA MPD = 0·48 × handheld MPD + 0·17 J cm(-2). The measured PUVA MPD was 0·48 of the handheld MPD, not 0·15 as predicted by the published PUVA action spectrum. CONCLUSIONS: The modified MPD tester is a convenient and safe method for PUVA MPD testing, overcoming many problems of the 'traditional method'. The difference between the PUVA and TL-10 lamps was lower than predicted from published studies. This suggests that formal re-evaluation of the erythema action spectrum for PUVA is now needed.

Ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant meropenem-susceptible KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: Analysis of cases and evaluation of in vitro activity of fosfomycin-containing combinations.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known regarding outcomes and optimal therapeutic regimens of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and susceptible to meropenem (MEM). Although susceptible to MEM in vitro, the possibility of developing MEM resistance overtime is a concern. We describe the clinical characteristics of patients with colonization/infection due to KPC variants with a focus on the in vitro activity of fosfomycin (FOS)-containing combinations. METHODS: Patients with colonization/infection due to a KPC variant were included. Fosfomycin susceptibility was performed by agar dilution method. Synergistic activity of FOS-based combinations was evaluated by gradient strip-agar diffusion method. The emergence of in vitro MEM resistance was also tested. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included: eight with infection [four with ventilator-associated pneumonia and four with bloodstream infections] and three with colonization. Previous therapy with CZA was administered to all patients (with a mean cumulative duration of 23 days). All subjects with infection received meropenem, in monotherapy (n = 4) or with amikacin (n = 2) or fosfomycin (n = 2), and achieved clinical cure. A new CZA-susceptible and MEM-resistant KPC-Kp strain was subsequently isolated in three patients (27.3%). Meropenem/vaborbactam (MVB) showed high in vitro activity, while FOS+MEM combination was synergistic in 40% of cases. In vitro resistance to MEM was observed with maintenance of CZA resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of KPC variants may occur within the same patient, especially if CZA has been previously administered. Although clinical success has been obtained with carbapenems, the emergence of MEM resistance is a concern. Fosfomycin plus meropenem is synergistic and may be a valuable combination option for KPC variants, while MVB may be considered in monotherapy. The detection of KPC variants in an endemic setting for KPC-Kp represents a worryingly emerging condition. The optimal therapeutic approach is still unknown and the development of meropenem resistance is of concern, which may lead to therapeutic failure in clinical practice. In these cases, the addition of fosfomycin to meropenem, or a more potent antibiotic, such as meropenem/vaborbactam, may be valuable therapeutic options.