Azelaic Acid Versus Hydroquinone for Managing Patients With Melasma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Melasma, a commonly acquired hyperpigmentation skin condition, is usually treated with topical agents as the first line of management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of azelaic acid versus hydroquinone in treating melasma patients. We conducted a comprehensive search across four online databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) from the time of their creation until May 28, 2023. We considered randomized controlled studies comparing hydroquinone with azelaic acid for the treatment of melasma patients. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 to evaluate the risk of bias. The mean difference (MD) for continuous variables and the risk ratio (RR) for categorical variables, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled. Six studies were included, with a total of 673 patients with melasma. The azelaic acid had a lower mean change in melasma area severity index (MASI) than the hydroquinone group [MD= -1.23, 95% CI (-2.05, -0.40), P=0.004]. No difference was observed regarding the improvement via the objective response scale, the reduction in pigmentation, or the adverse events reported. However, despite not being statistically significantly different, there was a trend towards having more good responses in the azelaic acid group. Azelaic acid may be better than hydroquinone in reducing melasma severity (measured by MASI). However, larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed to validate these findings.

A splenic hamartoma: Adding a new case to the literature: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Splenic tumours are relatively rare and include malignancies such as lymphomas, angiosarcomas, plasmacytomas, primary malignant fibrous histiocytomas, and splenic metastases. Benign tumours of the spleen such as hemangiomas, cysts, and inflammatory pseudotumours are very rare (Kaza et al., 2010, PisaniCeretti et al., 2012) [1,2]. There are fewer than 160 cases of splenic hamartoma or splenomas having been reported in the literature (Basso et al., 2012) [3]. Only 20% of the cases were detected in children (Abramowsky et al., 2004) [4]. Although multi-modality imaging findings were described preoperatively, the final diagnosis was splenic hamartoma based on histology and immunohistochemistry. CASE REPORT: Here, we report a case of a14 year old child left upper quadrant abdominal pain and worsening sickness. Multi-modality imaging detected a solid lesion of the spleen, who required splenectomy and was pathologically diagnosed as a splenic hamartoma. The postoperative course was uneventful. DISCUSSION: Splenic hamartoma is very rare. Only 20% of hamartomas occur in children. They are commonly found incidentally on imaging with no symptoms. CONCLUSION: Splenic hamartoma is a benign vascular proliferative lesion that requires a multi-modality imaging studies for diagnosis and confirmed by histopathology. It must be included in the differential diagnosis of splenic mass forming lesions.