Supplementary orthopaedic screening for children and adolescents to prevent permanent skeletal deformities - protocol for the "OrthoKids" study.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal deformities (SD) in children and adolescents can lead to arthritic conditions, impairment of quality of life, and high treatment costs in the long term. However, comprehensive data on the prevalence of SDs in children and adolescents are limited and it remains therefore unclear whether there is a healthcare gap. "OrthoKids" is a project that addresses this evidence gap by implementing an orthopaedic screening for children and adolescents that supplements existing detection examinations within statutory standard care in Germany. OBJECTIVE: To detect SDs so that they can be treated as needed at an early stage. METHODS: The implementation of the supplementary orthopaedic screening will be evaluated through an exploratory cohort study that is set up in the German state Baden-Wuerttemberg. 20,000 children and adolescents aged 10 to 14 years will be recruited as a prospective cohort. A retrospective control cohort will be formed based on claims data provided by two cooperating statutory health insurances (SHIs). Participating children and adolescents receive a one-time orthopaedic screening. If at least one SD is diagnosed, treatment will be provided as part of the statutory standard care. Within the scope of the project, a follow-up examination will be performed after one year. An IT-platform will complement the study. The primary outcome measure is the point prevalence of scoliosis, genu varum/valgum, hip dysplasia, and flat feet. Secondary outcome measures are (i) the point prevalence of further less common SDs, (ii) health-related quality of life (HRQoL), (iii) sports ability based on activity (physical/athletic), physical constraints, and (sports) injuries, as well as (iv) monetary consequences of the orthopaedic screenings' implementation. Implementation determinants will be evaluated, too. DISCUSSION: If the supplementary orthopaedic screening proves to be viable, it could be considered as a supplementary examination for children and adolescents within the frame of SHI in Germany. This could relieve the burden of disease among children and adolescents with SDs. In addition, it could disburden SHIs in the medium to long term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The OrthoKids study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS)) on 26th July 2022 under the number 00029057.

[Development of quality standards for patients with rheumatoid arthritis for use in Germany]. / Entwicklung von Qualitätsstandards für die Versorgung von Patient*innen mit rheumatoider Arthritis zur Anwendung in Deutschland.

Despite a qualitatively and structurally good care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany, there are still potentially amendable deficits in the quality of care. For this reason, the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) has therefore decided to ask a group of experts including various stakeholders to develop quality standards (QS) for the care of patients with RA in order to improve the quality of care. The QS are used to determine and quantitatively measure the quality of care, subject to relevance and feasibility. The recently published NICE and ASAS standards and a systematic literature search were used as the basis for development. A total of 8 QS, now published for the first time, were approved with the intention to measure and further optimize the quality of care for patients with RA in Germany.

[Development of quality standards for patients with axial spondyloarthritis for use in Germany]. / Entwicklung von Qualitätsstandards für Patient*innen mit axialer Spondyloarthritis zum Einsatz in Deutschland.

Quality standards (QS) are measurable constructs designed to quantify gaps in care and subsequently to improve quality of care. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) recently generated and published international QS for the management of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) for the first time. The German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) then decided to translate, review and possibly adopt these standards by a group of experts from different care settings. Against this background, national QS for the management of patients with axSpA for Germany were developed for the first time. The main focus was on feasibility and practical relevance. Ultimately, nine QS were defined with which the quality of care in Germany can and should be measured and improved.

A rapid point-of-care assay accurately measures vitamin D.

PURPOSE: Vitamin D (VitD) is a pleiotropic hormone with effects on a multitude of systems and metabolic pathways. Consequently, the relevance of a sufficiently high VitD serum level becomes self-evident. METHODS: A rapid immunofluorescence assay designed for the point-of-care measurement of serum VitD3 solely was tested. Inter- and intra-assay validation, double testing and result comparison with a standardized laboratory method were performed. RESULTS: An overall linear correlation of r = 0.89 (Pearson, 95% CI 0.88-0.92, p < 0.01) between the point of care and the conventional reference assay was registered. Accuracy and precision were of special interest at cut-points (10 ng/ml [mean deviation 1.7 ng/ml, SD 1.98 ng/ml, SE 0.16 ng/ml], 12 ng/ml [MD 0.41, SD 1.89, SE 0.19] and 30 ng/ml [MD - 1.11, SD 3.89, SE 0.35]). Only a slight deviation was detected between the two assays when using fresh (r = 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.94, p < 0.01) and frozen serum samples (r = 0.86, 0.82-0.89, p < 0.01). Results remained steady when samples were frozen several times. Inter- and intra-assay validation according to the CLSI protocol as well as multiuser testing showed stable results. CONCLUSION: This novel, innovative, and controlled study indicates that the evaluated rapid point of care VitD assay is reliable, accurate, and suited for clinical practice.

[Prescription of analgesics in patients with rheumatic diseases in Germany : A claims data analysis. German version]. / Verordnung von Schmerzmitteln bei Patienten mit rheumatischen Erkrankungen in Deutschland : Eine Analyse von Abrechnungsdaten.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prescription frequency of analgesics in persons diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondylarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2019 using claims data. METHODS: Persons ≥ 18 years insured in 2019 with a diagnosis of RA (M05, M06), axSpA (M45), PsA (M07.0-3) or SLE (M32.1,8,9) were included. Analgesics were identified by the anatomic therapeutic classification (ATC) system. Reported is the percentage of individuals with ≥ 1 analgesics prescription for the respective rheumatic diagnosis in 2019 and for opioids age-standardized in each of the years 2005-2019. In addition, the proportion of long-term opioid use (prescriptions in ≥ 3 consecutive quarter years) in 2006 and 2019 is compared. RESULTS: Metamizole (29-33%) was the most commonly prescribed analgesic. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/coxibs were prescribed from 35% (SLE) to 50% (axSpA). Of the patients 11-13% were prescribed weak and 6-8% strong opioids. From 2005 to 2019, the proportion of persons with an opioid prescription remained stable, with similar or slightly decreasing proportions of weak opioids and more frequent prescriptions of strong opioids. The proportion of long-term opioid prescriptions increased from 2006 to 2019 from 8.9% to 11.0% (RA), from 6.9% to 9.1% (axSPA), from 7.8% to 9.5% (PsA), and from 7.5% to 8.8% (SLE), corresponding to a 17-24% increase. CONCLUSION: The prescription of opioids for persons with inflammatory rheumatic diagnoses is not as high in Germany as in other countries; however, the proportion of long-term prescriptions has considerably increased. The frequent prescription of metamizole is conspicuous.

Prescription of analgesics in patients with rheumatic diseases in Germany : A claims data analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prescription frequency of analgesics in persons diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondylarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 2019 using claims data. METHODS: Persons ≥ 18 years insured in 2019 with a diagnosis of RA (M05, M06), axSpA (M45), PsA (M07.0-3) or SLE (M32.1,8,9) were included. Analgesics were identified by the anatomic therapeutic classification (ATC) system. Reported is the percentage of individuals with ≥ 1 analgesics prescription for the respective rheumatic diagnosis in 2019 and for opioids age-standardized in each of the years 2005-2019. In addition, the proportion of long-term opioid use (prescriptions in ≥ 3 consecutive quarter years) in 2006 and 2019 is compared. RESULTS: Metamizole (29-33%) was the most commonly prescribed analgesic. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)/coxibs were prescribed from 35% (SLE) to 50% (axSpA). Of the patients 11-13% were prescribed weak and 6-8% strong opioids. From 2005 to 2019, the proportion of persons with an opioid prescription remained stable, with similar or slightly decreasing proportions of weak opioids and more frequent prescriptions of strong opioids. The proportion of long-term opioid prescriptions increased from 2006 to 2019 from 8.9% to 11.0% (RA), from 6.9% to 9.1% (axSPA), from 7.8% to 9.5% (PsA), and from 7.5% to 8.8% (SLE), corresponding to a 17-24% increase. CONCLUSION: The prescription of opioids for persons with inflammatory rheumatic diagnoses is not as high in Germany as in other countries; however, the proportion of long-term prescriptions has considerably increased. The frequent prescription of metamizole is conspicuous.

COMPARISON OF WEARABLES FOR SELF-MONITORING OF HEART RATE IN CORONARY REHABILITATION PATIENTS.

The leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the world is ischemic heart disease. Physical activity is a major approach in prevention and therapy of cardiac diseases. Self-heart-rate-monitoring in daily life is an important point for health awareness of cardiac patients. Aim of this study was validation of measurement accuracy of seven different devices against ECG-monitoring during cardiac rehabilitation training on a bicycle ergometer. Tested devices were: Garmin Forerunner 35 (Garmin), Mio Fuse (Mio), Fitbit Charge HR (FitbitHR), Fitbit Surge (FitbitS), Withings Pulse™ Ox (Withings), Apple Watch Series 1 (Apple) and Pearl Fitness-Tracker (FBT-50.HR PRO.V4). All devices were tested on 35 participants with six timed measurements during 20 minutes constant load bicycle ergometer workout for each. Simultaneousely, ECG measurements were recorded. Pearson´s correlations were assessed. Apple, Mio, and Garmin showed excellent accuracy with close correlation to ECG for self-monitoring of heart rate (HR) during cycling. FitbitHR, Pearl and FitbitS presented reasonable results. In contrast, Withings showed poor correlation to ECG with significant differences. We found significant differences between the tested devices. Since accuracy is of major importance for cardiac patients, only Apple, Mio and Garmin could be recommended. However, further research within distinct clinical and non-clinical settings is necessary and should take different types of physical activities into account.

[Perspectives for rheumatological health services research at the German Rheumatism Research Center]. / Perspektiven für die rheumatologische Versorgungsforschung am Deutschen Rheuma-Forschungszentrum.

This review article summarizes the current projects and perspectives of rheumatological healthcare research in the program area epidemiology of the German Rheumatism Research Center. Health services research is conducted with the help of various data sources. In addition to the classical rheumatological disease registers, health insurance data and population-related cohorts are increasingly being used for analyses. From data collection and monitoring to analysis algorithms, digital applications will change the healthcare research over the coming years. Collaborative analyses with national and international cooperation partners, including biomarkers, complete the research fields in the program area epidemiology. The digitalization of research projects is a central component that will further change health services research in the coming decade.

[Which patients with rheumatoid arthritis do not receive DMARD treatment? Analysis of data from the German Collaborative Arthritis Centers]. / Welche Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis erhalten keine DMARD-Therapie? Eine Analyse von Daten der Kerndokumentation.

BACKGROUND: The vast majority of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) included in the national database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centers are treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). The clinical and patient-related characteristics of patients who did not have DMARD treatment in the longer term were investigated. METHODOLOGY: Between 2012 and 2016 a total of 10,289 patients with RA were documented. Patient characteristics, disease activity and severity, comorbidities and concomitant treatment were descriptively evaluated. Patients who were without DMARDs for more than 1 year and not in remission (disease activity score 28, simple disease activity index or Boolean remission) were analyzed separately. Logistic regression was used to investigate which variables were associated with DMARD treatment. RESULTS: A total of 426 patients were ≤1 year without DMARDs, 1090 > 1 year without DMARDs and 8773 (85%) currently had DMARD treatment. Of the patients who were without DMARDs for more than 1 year, 51% were in remission. Even if no remission criteria were met, the rheumatologists nevertheless found the strived for RA situation in the majority of patients. Of the patients who were without DMARDs for more than 1 year, 13% received glucocorticoid treatment >5 mg/day. In patients with a high degree of severity (odds ratio, OR severe vs. asymptomatic/mild 2.33, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.80;3.02) or positive rheumatoid factor (OR 2.24, CI 1.96;2.56) the chance of receiving DMARD treatment was twice as high. Existing comorbidities did not reduce the chance of receiving DMARD treatment. CONCLUSION: The RA patients in the national database who had no DMARDs for more than 1 year were mostly in remission or with low disease activity. Signs of inadequate disease control were found in only 11% of all patients without DMARD treatment.

Long-term trends in rheumatology care : Achievements and deficits in 25 years of the German national rheumatology database.

BACKGROUND: Since 1993, data on the care and quality of life of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have been collected in the German National Database (NDB) of the regional collaborative rheumatology centers. OBJECTIVE: In this review long-term trends on treatment, disease activity and gainful employment of the most common inflammatory rheumatic diseases are presented and the most important analyses from 25 years of the NDB are summarized. METHODS: Between 15 and 17 rheumatological institutions take part in the NDB and once a year collect data from a total of more than 10,000 patients. The rheumatologists document the disease status and care, the patients report on their state of health and the effects of the disease. RESULTS: The biologics era at the beginning of the twenty-first century has led to changes in the therapeutic spectrum of most inflammatory rheumatic diseases, especially in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Some basic therapies formerly used are hardly used anymore and glucocorticoids are used less frequently. Methotrexate has remained the standard therapy for rheumatoid arthritis over the years. Nowadays, nearly 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis receive treatment with biologics. Disease activity, functional and social restrictions have decreased across all diseases. CONCLUSION: The improved health status of many patients with rheumatic diseases confirms the high level of care provided by the rheumatism centers involved in the NDB. The increasing specification of measuring instruments and the standardization of documentation systems are major challenges that the NDB will have to face in the coming years if it is to remain in the digital age.

[Long-term trends in rheumatology care : Achievements and deficits in 25 years of the German national rheumatology database]. / Langzeittrends in der rheumatologischen Versorgung : Erfolge und Defizite im Spiegel von 25 Jahren rheumatologischer Kerndokumentation.

BACKGROUND: Since 1993, data on the care and quality of life of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have been collected in the German National Database (NDB) of the regional collaborative rheumatology centers. OBJECTIVE: In this review long-term trends on treatment, disease activity and gainful employment of the most common inflammatory rheumatic diseases are presented and the most important analyses from 25 years of the NDB are summarized. METHODS: Between 15 and 17 rheumatological institutions take part in the core documentation and once a year collect data from a total of more than 10,000 patients. The rheumatologists document the disease status and care, the patients report on their state of health and the effects of the disease. RESULTS: The biologics era at the beginning of the twenty-first century has led to changes in the therapeutic spectrum of most inflammatory rheumatic diseases, especially in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Some basic therapies formerly used are hardly used anymore and glucocorticoids are used less frequently. Methotrexate has remained the standard therapy for rheumatoid arthritis over the years. Nowadays, nearly 30% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis receive treatment with biologics. Disease activity, functional and social restrictions have decreased across all diseases. CONCLUSION: The improved health status of many patients with rheumatic diseases confirms the high level of care provided by the rheumatism centers involved in the NDB. The increasing specification of measuring instruments and the standardization of documentation systems are major challenges that the NDB will have to face in the coming years if it is to remain in the digital age.

[Non-drug treatment of rheumatoid arthritis : An analysis of claims data and a survey of insured persons (Project PROCLAIR)]. / Nichtmedikamentöse Versorgung der rheumatoiden Arthritis : Eine Analyse von Abrechnungsdaten und einer Versichertenbefragung (Projekt PROCLAIR).

BACKGROUND: Only small amounts of data are available on the prescription frequency of physical therapies (PT) for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate prescription frequencies of PT considering functional status and sociodemographic factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 98,963 adults diagnosed with RA in 2013 were identified in claims data from the BARMER health insurance. A questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 6193 people requesting information on the disease status. Of these 2535 persons were included who agreed to the linking of the questionnaire and claims data and who confirmed a diagnosis of RA. From the routine claims data the prescription of PT and occupational therapy as well as the medical discipline of the prescribing physician were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to determine which variables (age, sex, M05/M06 diagnosis, residential area, income, functional status and rheumatological care) were associated with the use of PT. RESULTS: In 2015 a total of 47% of the study population received PT (35% physiotherapy, 15% thermotherapy, 15% manual therapy, 2% electrotherapy and 6% massage) and 3% occupational therapy. Of the PT prescriptions 37% were issued by general practitioners, 27% by orthopedists and 18% by rheumatologists. Women and persons living in the eastern states of Germany and patients with high functional impairment were prescribed PT more often. Income, educational status, seropositivity and rheumatological care did not have any influence on the frequency of prescription of PT. CONCLUSION: There are deficits in the outpatient prescription of PT but without indications of an undersupply of population groups due to low socioeconomic status. In contrast to the prescription of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment, PT is predominantly prescribed by general practitioners.

[Reality of care for musculoskeletal diseases at the population level : Results of the PROCLAIR collaborative project. German version]. / Versorgungswirklichkeit muskuloskeletaler Erkrankungen auf Bevölkerungsebene : Erkenntnisse aus dem Verbundprojekt PROCLAIR.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the research consortium PROCLAIR was to gain population level knowledge on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) and osteoarthritis (OA) in Germany. AIMS: A main question of the consortium was whether it is possible to identify groups of people who were exposed to a particular risk of undersupply or oversupply of treatment. In addition, the study investigated the validity of claims data for these diseases as a basis for further studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys were carried out among insurees of the BARMER statutory health insurance fund whose claims data included RA, axSpA and OA diagnoses. The questionnaire data were linked with the claims data of the insured persons if they agreed. RESULTS: In all three diseases risk groups for care deficits could be identified. Persons with RA who are not treated by a specialist have less access to drug treatment. Physical therapy is prescribed for all three diagnoses at a low level, even for people undergoing joint replacement surgery. A connection between depressive symptoms and disease activity or function in axSpA was shown. In addition to the results relevant to care, the PROCLAIR network has also made contributions to critically assess the quality of health insurance data. DISCUSSION: The combination of billing data with survey data enables a comprehensive description of the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. Particularly relevant factors are the specialization of the physician, sociodemographic parameters of the patients and the region of residence. In particular, access to treatment cannot be investigated in randomized clinical trials.

Reality of care for musculoskeletal diseases at the population level : Results of the PROCLAIR collaborative project.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the research consortium PROCLAIR was to gain population level knowledge on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) and osteoarthritis (OA) in Germany. AIMS: A main question of the consortium was whether it is possible to identify groups of people who were exposed to a particular risk of undersupply or oversupply of treatment. In addition, the study investigated the validity of claims data for these diseases as a basis for further studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional surveys were carried out among insurees of the BARMER statutory health insurance fund whose claims data included RA, axSpA and OA diagnoses. The questionnaire data were linked with the claims data of the insured persons if they agreed. RESULTS: In all three diseases risk groups for care deficits could be identified. Persons with RA who are not treated by a specialist have less access to drug treatment. Physical therapy is prescribed for all three diagnoses at a low level, even for people undergoing joint replacement surgery. A connection between depressive symptoms and disease activity or function in axSpA was shown. In addition to the results relevant to care, the PROCLAIR network has also made contributions to critically assess the quality of health insurance data. DISCUSSION: The combination of billing data with survey data enables a comprehensive description of the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. Particularly relevant factors are the specialization of the physician, sociodemographic parameters of the patients and the region of residence. In particular, access to treatment cannot be investigated in randomized clinical trials.

Expression and distribution of key proteins of the endocannabinoid system in the human seminal vesicles.

The endocannabinoid system (ECS), comprising the cannabinoid receptors (CBR), their ligands, and enzymes controlling the turnover of endocannabinoids, has been suggested to be involved in male reproductive function. As information is scarce on the expression of the ECS in human male reproductive tissues, this study aimed to investigate by means of molecular biology (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence the expression and distribution of CB1 and CB2, GPR55 (an orphan G protein-coupled receptor that recognises cannabinoid ligands) and FAAH (isoforms 1 and 2) in the human seminal vesicles (SV). The specimens expressed PCR products corresponding to CB1 (66 bp), CB2 (141 bp), GPR55 (112 bp), FAAH1 (260 bp) and FAAH2 (387 bp). Immumohistochemistry revealed dense expression of CB1, CB2 and GPR55 located to the pseudo-stratified columnar epithelium and varicose nerves (also characterised by the expression of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and calcitonin gene-related peptide). Cytosolic staining for FAAH1 and FAAH2 was seen in cuboidal cells of all layers of the epithelium. No immunoreactivity was detected in the smooth musculature or nerve fibres. CB1, CB2, GPR55, FAAH1 and FAAH2 are highly expressed in the human SV. Considering their localisation, the ECS may be involved in epithelial homeostasis, secretory function or autonomic mechano-afferent signalling.

[Outpatient care and disease burden of rheumatoid arthritis : Results of a linkage of claims data and a survey of insured persons]. / Ambulante Versorgung und Krankheitslast der rheumatoiden Arthritis : Eine Analyse von Abrechnungsdaten und einer Versichertenbefragung.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Germany has mainly been evaluated in the past in RA cohorts from specialized arthritis centers. This study investigated rheumatological care on a population basis, using claims data from a nationwide statutory health insurance fund (BARMER GEK) in combination with patient-reported outcomes from a questionnaire survey of insured persons with RA. METHODS: Data from insurants aged 18-79 years with M05 (seropositive RA) or M06 (other RA, ICD-10) diagnoses were analyzed concerning diagnostics, medication and prescribing physician. A 31-item questionnaire covering patient reported diagnosis, healthcare utilization and burden of illness was sent to a stratified random sample of 6193 insured persons. Data from the respondents regarding rheumatological care and disease status were evaluated. RESULTS: In 2013 and 2014, a total of 96,921 adults with M05 or M06 diagnosis were insured. The questionnaire was answered by 51% of the sample and of these 81% confirmed the RA diagnosis. RA had been diagnosed by a rheumatologist in 59% of the cases, 70% reported moderate to severe pain and 46% had functional disability. Between at least 40% (claims data) and up to 68% (respondents) were in specialized rheumatological care. Treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) was 61% (claims data) and 63% (respondents) in persons in rheumatological care but only 18% outside rheumatological care. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that specialized rheumatological care is required to provide adequate treatment for patients with RA in Germany. Patients with higher age and patients with M06 diagnosis had less drug prescriptions and were less frequently treated by rheumatologists.

[Methodological approaches in the development of clinical guidelines]. / Methodische Vorgehensweisen bei der Entwicklung von Leitlinien.

Practical guidelines assist the clinical decision-making process in modern medicine. In rheumatology the number of practical guidelines dealing with diagnostics and therapy of rheumatic diseases is also constantly increasing. Methodological standards for guidelines ensure adequate development under consideration of precisely defined structures. Expert recommendations for action (S1) are distinguished from consensus (S2k) or evidence-based (S2e) as well as consensus and evidence-based (S3) guidelines. Levels of evidence categorize available studies by study design. Parameters for the evaluation of guidelines are summarized in the German instrument for the assessment of guidelines (DELBI).

[How frequent are poor prognostic markers in rheumatoid arthritis? : An estimate based on three epidemiologic cohorts]. / Wie häufig sind prognostisch ungünstige Faktoren bei Patienten mit rheumatoider Arthritis? : Eine Abschätzung anhand von 3 epidemiologischen Kohorten.

BACKGROUND: Unfavorable prognostic factors-high disease activity, early erosions, and autoantibodies-should be considered when making treatment decisions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There are little data on the frequency of individual poor prognostic factors among RA patients in daily care. METHODS: Disease activity (Disease Activity Score, DAS28), erosions, antibodies against citrullinated peptides or rheumatoid factor (ACPA/RF+), previous treatment failure, inflammation markers, and functional disability (FFbH < 70) were defined as prognostic factors. Different treatment decision making situations were evaluated in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naïve patients from the early RA CAPEA cohort (n = 1059), and in patients from the biologics register RABBIT after failure of one (n = 2217) or more (n = 3280) conventional synthetic (cs)DMARDs or one (n = 1134) or more (n = 795) biologic (b)DMARDs. With the national database of German arthritis centers (NDB), the frequency of these factors was analyzed according to treatment strata (no/1st/2nd/3rd DMARD; n = 5707). RESULTS: In DMARD-naïve patients (CAPEA), 50% presented with DAS28 > 5.1, 64% were ACPA/RF+, 13% had erosions, and 37% functional disability (FFbH < 70). In RABBIT, 63 (1st csDMARD failure) to 81% (≥2 bDMARD failures) were ACPA/RF+, 29 to 70% had erosions, 33 to 52% DAS28 > 5.1, and 41 to 66% had FFbH < 70, respectively. In the NDB, between 47 (DMARD-naïve) and 82% (≥2 previous DMARDs) were ACPA/RF+, 5 to 11%, had high disease activity under treatment (DAS28 > 5.1), and 26 to 50% had functional disability (FFbH < 70), respectively. CONCLUSION: With growing numbers of previous DMARD therapies, increasing proportions of patients have poor prognostic factors. This underlines the importance of these factors for a difficult-to-treat disease course.

[Medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in 2014 : Current data from the German Collaborative Arthritis Centers]. / Versorgung der rheumatoiden Arthritis 2014 : Aktuelle Daten aus der Kerndokumentation.

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of biologic treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), disease activity and treatment modalities have changed substantially. The current provision and developments in recent years are analyzed with annual data from the National Database of the Collaborative Arthritis Centers in Germany. METHODS: To analyze disease activity, diagnostics and treatment in RA patients in 2014 with regard to seropositivity and disease duration. Time trends from 2007-2014 are reported for disease activity (DAS28) distribution and biologic treatment. RESULTS: In 2014, a total of 8,084 RA patients were analyzed: 72 % were rheumatoid factor and/or ACPA positive, the mean age was 62 years and the mean disease duration 12 years. According to DAS28, 35.9 % were in remission, 19.2 % had low, 37.1 % moderate and 7.8 % high disease activity. An increase since 2007 was only observed in patients with a disease duration >2 years. Synthetic DMARDS were used for treatment in 78 %. Biologic treatment increased from 16 % (2007) to 27 % (2014). Especially those patients with a disease duration >5 years were treated more frequently with biologics. Seronegative patients had slightly less severe mean disease activity parameters. They were treated equally frequent with DMARDS but only half as often with biologics compared to seropositive patients. CONCLUSION: The use of biologics in RA patients has increased since 2007; however this was not observed in patients with short disease duration. Early intensive treatment adaption seems justified to improve disease activity in the large portion of patients who do not reach low disease activity under conventional DMARDs.

Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in comparison with age- and sex-matched controls: results of a claims data analysis.

The aim of this study was to assess the vaccination status for influenza and pneumonia and the prevalence of hospitalised pneumonia in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and population controls in Germany. Members of a large statutory health insurance fund in Germany who were continuously insured between 2009 and 2013 and had a diagnosis of RA in 2013 were age and sex matched 1:5 to members without RA. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations were evaluated with regard to age, sex and region of residence. Logistic regression models were used to determine predictors for influenza vaccination in RA patients. Prevalences of pneumonia that required hospitalisation were compared to regional vaccination rates. The data of 111,482 RA patients and 557,410 matched controls were available for analysis. Compared to controls, RA patients were vaccinated more frequently against influenza (40.8 vs. 32.2 %) and pneumonia (15.0 vs. 10.0 %). Vaccination rates increased with older age and differed between the federal states (highest in East Germany, lowest in South Germany). The region of residence, comorbidities, rheumatologic care and biologic treatment was associated with a higher probability of an influenza vaccination. Prevalences of pneumonia that required hospitalisation were 2-3 times higher in patients compared to controls and tended to be higher in regions with low vaccination rates. The increased pneumonia prevalence in RA patients confirms their status as a risk group. RA patients are vaccinated more frequently than controls, but vaccination rates are still low. The lower pneumonia prevalence in East Germany indicates that vaccination may help to reduce pneumonia in RA.