RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of Microfragmented Autologous Fat Tissue (MFAT) treatment for knee osteoarthritis and to investigate whether patients' pre-treatment clinical condition, such as synovitis, correlates with clinical outcomes, to identify potential predicting factors for the success or failure of the treatment. METHODS: In this prospective Cohort Study Level II multicentric trial, consecutive patients with a diagnosis of early/mild osteoarthritis and failure of previous conservative measures were enrolled to undergo diagnostic arthroscopy and a single MFAT injection. Patients were assessed with repeated scoring systems at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. The demographic features, the arthroscopic findings, the immunophenotype of injected tissue and the histologic examination of synovia of failed patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Data from 91 patients showed a significant improvement in Lysholm, WOMAC scores at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.001). A significant decrease in VAS score was observed, while a significant improvement of measured flexion angle was registered at 1 year (p < 0.001). No major complications were reported. Age and synovitis were identified as significant factors influencing the clinical outcome (p < 0.05). Body mass index, previous or concomitant procedures, and specific cartilage defects had no influence. The mean number of injected adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells seem not to correlate with the clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: MFAT is effective in reducing pain when used with a single dose injection in early/mild OA of the knee, without major complications. Age over 60 and synovitis may be predictive for persistent pain at one year and should be considered before indications.
Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Sinovite , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/patologia , Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Sinovite/etiologia , Sinovite/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: We aim at analysing the impact of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in restoring the main spinopelvic parameters, along with its potentials and limitations in correcting sagittal imbalance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2009 PRISMA flow chart was used to systematically review the literature; 27 papers were eventually selected. The following spinopelvic parameters were observed: pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lumbar lordosis (LLseg) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Papers reporting on hyperlordotic cages (HLC) were analysed separately. The indirect decompression potential of ALIF was also assessed. The clinical outcome was obtained by collecting visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. Global fusion rate and main complications were collected. RESULTS: PT, SS, LL, LLseg and SVA spinopelvic parameters all improved postoperatively by - 4.3 ± 5.2°, 3.9 ± 4.5°, 10.6 ± 12.5°, 6.7 ± 3.5° and 51.1 ± 44.8 mm, respectively. HLC were statistically more effective in restoring LL and LLseg (p < 0.05). Postoperative disc height, anterior disc height, posterior disc height and foraminal height, respectively, increased by 58.5%, 87.2%, 80.9% and 18.1%. Postoperative improvements were observed in VAS back and leg and ODI scores (p < 0.05). The global fusion rate was 94.5 ± 5.5%; the overall complication rate was 13%. CONCLUSION: When managing sagittal imbalance, ALIF can be considered as a valid technique to achieve the correct spinopelvic parameters based on preoperative planning. This technique permits to obtain an optimal LL distribution and a solid anterior column support, with lower complications and higher fusion rates when compared to posterior osteotomies.
Assuntos
Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Região Lombossacral , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Major joints of the lower limbs are commonly affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with consequent pain, loss of function, and progressive disability. Knee replacement represents a useful solution, but a highly constrained implant design is often needed in order to face the severe anatomical deformities and the gross instability that the surgeon may encounter in the rheumatoid knee. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this work was to evaluate the Endo-Model(®) rotating hinge knee prosthesis implanted in patients affected by RA and severely damaged knees. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a series of 38 patients with RA implanted with the Endo-Model(®) rotating hinge knee prosthesis for primary or revision surgery (mean follow-up 6.1 years; mean age at surgery 71.5 years). At the time of surgery, the mean duration of RA was 13.2 years. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically and the Knee Society Score (KSS) was used. RESULTS: Implant survival at most recent follow-up was 91.7 %. Mean final knee flexion was 102.7 °. The mean KSS was 93.5 (excellent) and 67.1 (good) for clinical and functional score, respectively. Mild pain was present in 10 patients. No sign of malalignment or residual instability was found. No evidence of loosening or implant failure was observed in x-rays. CONCLUSION: The Endo-Model(®) rotating hinge knee prosthesis provides excellent pain relief, functional recovery, and intrinsic knee stability both in complex primary and in revision knee arthroplasty in the majority of patients with severely affected rheumatoid knees.
Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Artrite Reumatoide/cirurgia , Artroplastia do Joelho/instrumentação , Artroplastia do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , Prótese do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Desenho de Prótese , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the comparative clinical and functional outcomes, postoperative complications, and radiological outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed using the transtibial (TT) approach or anteromedial (AM) technique. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. RCTs comparing TT and AM techniques were considered only. The quality of the studies was defined using the GRADE system, and the risk of bias was assessed with the RoB 2 tool. The primary endpoint was to systematically review and meta-analyze the clinical outcomes, residual laxity and failure rate of both AM and TT techniques. In the current meta-analysis 13 RCTs involving 989 patients who underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACLR (486 TT and 503 AM) were included. Patients undergoing AM technique resulted in higher objective-IKDC (p < 0.001) and Lysholm scores (p = 0.002), despite a lower incidence of pathological anterior tibial translation (p < 0.001) and positive pivot-shift test (p < 0.001). No differences were detected in IKDC subjective score (p = 0.26), Tegner activity scale (p = 0.18) and graft failure (p = 0.07). ACL reconstruction through AM portal technique provides better clinical outcomes and lower incidence of residual rotational and anteroposterior laxity in comparison with the TT technique. No statistically significant difference in subjective outcomes and graft failure was reported.
Assuntos
Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Fêmur , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Tíbia , Humanos , Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/métodos , Fêmur/cirurgia , Tíbia/cirurgia , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Artroscopia/métodos , Instabilidade Articular/etiologia , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgiaRESUMO
The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a possible source of persistent or new onset pain after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. The aim of this paper is to systematically review and analyze the available literature related to the incidence, diagnosis and management of sacroiliitis after spinal arthrodesis. The authors independently screened the titles and abstracts of all articles identified concerning sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion, to assess their suitability to the research focus. The average incidence of sacroiliitis after lumbar or lumbosacral arthrodesis was found to be 37 ± 28.48 (range 6-75), increasing directly to the number of fused segments involved, especially when the sacrum is included. The most accurate evaluation is the image-guided injection of anesthetic solutions in the joint. Surgery treatment may be considered when conservative therapy fails, with open surgery or with minimally invasive SIJ fusion. Although the risk of developing SIJ degeneration is unclear, the results indicate that pain and degeneration of SIJ develop more often in patients undergoing lumbosacral fusion regardless of the number of melting segments. The treatment of sacroiliitis appears to be independent of his etiology, with or without previous instrumentation on several levels.
Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Sacroileíte/etiologia , Fusão Vertebral , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/uso terapêutico , Artrodese , Criança , Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia/etiologia , Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia/cirurgia , Síndrome Pós-Laminectomia/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Articulação Sacroilíaca/fisiopatologia , Articulação Sacroilíaca/cirurgia , Sacroileíte/diagnóstico , Sacroileíte/epidemiologia , Sacroileíte/terapia , Sacro/cirurgia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current literature and to assess the clinical outcomes following meniscal ramp lesion treatment and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. A consensus of the treatment of this pattern of tears is still lacking. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed with a comprehensive search on Medline through PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase and Google Scholar databases. The PRISMA 2009 flowchart and checklist were considered to edit the review. The included studies were evaluated based on indications, management, surgical technique and clinical results. RESULTS: Seven studies (two level II and five level IV evidence) were identified that met inclusion criteria, including a total of 509 patients. The overall main follow-up was 23.6 months. Treatment failure occurred in 8.3% of patients receiving ACL repair and ramp lesion treatment. The repair of ramp lesion is the most used approach in the literature. CONCLUSION: There is a lack of literature focused on the management of ramp lesion and ACL injuries. The repair resulted in the most used approach with good clinical results and low failure rate. However, further high-quality studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of different surgical strategies are needed.
Assuntos
Traumatismos do Joelho/cirurgia , Lesões do Menisco Tibial/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Artroscopia/métodos , Criança , Tratamento Conservador , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Instabilidade Articular/etiologia , Traumatismos do Joelho/reabilitação , Traumatismos do Joelho/terapia , Masculino , Meniscos Tibiais/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Lesões do Menisco Tibial/reabilitação , Lesões do Menisco Tibial/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Patellar instability is the pathologic condition where the patella is prone to recurrent lateral dislocation. The clinical results on large series of patients and long-term outcome of Goldthwait techniques have not been described in the literature. The aim of this systematic review is: (1) to analyze and summarize the available literature focused on Goldthwait procedure in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation and (2) to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients treated with this surgical procedure. A systematic review of the literature was performed to investigate the results of Goldthwait procedure according to the PRISMA 2009 guidelines. A total of 7 articles published were systematically reviewed. A total of 197 knees (182 patients: 86 males and 96 females) have been treated with Goldthwait procedure. The mean reported follow-up was 6.8 years. The mean age at surgery was 18 years old. The Goldthwait procedure was associated with open lateral retinacular release in 127 (64.5%) knees to arthroscopic lateral retinacular release in 20 (10.1%) knees, and with retinacular plasty and a vastus medialis advancement in 33 (16.7%) knees. Only in 17 (8.6%) knees the Goldthwait procedure was performed as an isolated procedure. Poor standardization of methodological assessment has been observed. Despite the limitations of the available literature, the Goldthwait technique provides satisfying results for the treatment of patellar instability even in pediatric population. More high-quality studies are necessary to evaluate the long-term complications and the real incidence of long-term PF osteoarthritis.
Assuntos
Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Luxação Patelar/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Humanos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/etiologia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Recidiva , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare the clinical results and related complications of four different surgical treatments of complex proximal humeral fractures according to their classification and features of patients. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2011, 92 consecutive patients with diagnosis of three-four-part displaced fractures, fractures with head dislocation and head-splitting fractures were evaluated postoperatively with Constant-Murley score, disability of arm, shoulder and hand score and simple shoulder test. RESULTS: All the treatment modalities showed from optimal to good mean functional results. The statistical analysis comparing each treatment group showed better outcomes scores (p < 0.05) for: locked plating versus HA, locked plating versus RSA and RSA versus HA. No differences between postoperative range of motion, complication rate and overall revision rate of the treatment groups were found at the end of follow-up (p > 0.05). Overall complication rate of surgical treatment of complex PHF was 31.5% (29 patients) with overall revision rate of 14.1%. Among patients with complications 77.8% of HA (7 of 9) required revision surgery (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of complex PHF is nowadays a challenge even for skilled shoulder surgeons. The several viable operative options give good results whenever used for the correct indication. The range of reported complications from 18.2 to 37.5% remains concerning, but most of them did not affect clinical outcome in this series. Accurate preoperative characterization of the fracture pattern is necessary, and high surgical skills of the different operative techniques, including arthroplasty, are recommended to meet the increased functional expectations of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic series, Level IV.
Assuntos
Artroplastia do Ombro , Pinos Ortopédicos , Placas Ósseas , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas do Ombro/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia do Ombro/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas do Ombro/complicações , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of clinical examination to that of MRI evaluated by two independent radiologists for the diagnosis of meniscal tears and chronic anterior cruciate ligament injuries and to assess the MRI accuracy in the diagnosis of cartilage defects. METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive patients with suspected intra-articular knee pathology were prospectively evaluated by objective examination, 1.5 T MRI, re-examined by trained radiologist and arthroscopy. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Agreement analysis with kappa (Ð) coefficient values was performed for meniscal and ACL tears. RESULTS: No differences were found between diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination, the first and second MRI reports in diagnosis of medial meniscus (84 vs 96 vs 97 %) and anterior cruciate ligament injuries (93 vs 78 vs 89 %). For the lateral meniscal tears, the accuracy of the second radiologist was significantly higher than those of the first (96 vs 75 %; p < 0.01) and clinical examination (96 vs 86 %; p = 0.02). High diagnostic values were obtained for the diagnosis of full-thickness chondral defects with sensitivity of 100 %, specificity of 95 % and accuracy of 95 %. CONCLUSION: Clinical and MRI evaluations have no differences in the diagnosis of medial meniscus and anterior cruciate ligament injuries. A trained radiologist obtained better sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the diagnosis of lateral meniscus. 1.5 T MRI does not represent the technique of choice in the evaluation of chondral defect but demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for detection of full-thickness chondral defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic prospective study, Level II.
Assuntos
Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico , Artroscopia , Traumatismos do Joelho/diagnóstico , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Exame Físico , Lesões do Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico , Adulto , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Artroscopia/métodos , Cartilagem Articular/lesões , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Humanos , Traumatismos do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Joelho/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Exame Físico/métodos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Lesões do Menisco Tibial/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Menisco Tibial/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Anterior leg pain is common in professional athletes and tibiofibular synostosis is reported to be a rare cause of anterior compartment pain or ankle pain related to sports activities. The management and appropriate treatment of this condition in professional athletes is controversial and the literature on the topic is sparse. Distal synostosis is usually related to ankle sprain and syndesmotic ligament injury, and proximal synostosis has been linked to leg length discrepancy and exostosis. Mid-shaft synostosis is even less common than proximal and distal forms. We present the treatment of mid-shaft tibiofibular synostosis in 2 cases of professional athletes (soccer and basketball player), along with a review of the literature. When diaphyseal synostosis is diagnosed, first-line conservative treatment, including ultrasound-guided steroid injection is recommended. However, if it does not respond to conservative management, surgical resection may be indicated to relieve symptoms.