Evaluation of Fatigue among Older Population in Jordan.

Objective: Fatigue among older adults has not received empirical attention in the Arabic region. Thus, this study aimed to assess the levels of fatigue and its related psychosocial factors and examine the predictors of fatigue in older Jordanians aged 60 years and more.Methods: This study used a cross-sectional design and our sample was 250 older adults receiving health services at comprehensive healthcare centers in Amman Governorate, the capital of Jordan. The study used the following scales: Fatigue scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, Multidimensional Social Support Scale, and sociodemographic and lifestyle behaviors datasheet.Results: The results showed that approximately 57% of the participants experienced severe fatigue. Nearly 90% of the older adults reported having moderate to high levels of stress, around 97% experienced moderate and high levels of social support, and almost 68% had normal self-esteem. The significant predictors of the total fatigue scores were, consuming soft drinks, practicing exercise, perceived levels of stress, and social support levels.Conclusions: Awareness of the magnitude and the factors predicting fatigue among elderlies in Jordan should inform the practice and encourage clinicians to implement individualized care plans that include fatigue reduction strategies, to elderlies visiting healthcare centers.

Comparison of axial and anterior interbody fusions of the L5-S1 segment: a retrospective cohort analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter review of 96 patients who underwent L5-S1 interbody fusions through either a standard anterior retroperitoneal approach or using a novel device inserted through the presacral space (AxiaLIF) in conjunction with supplemental posterior fixation between 2002 and 2010. OBJECTIVE: To compare the radiographic fusion rates and adverse events associated with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and AxiaLIF techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Interbody fusions of the lumbosacral spine are frequently performed to provide anterior column support, increase the amount of surface area for bone formation, and facilitate deformity reduction. A number of different surgical approaches have been developed for this purpose including minimally invasive techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient information and procedural data were obtained from hospital charts. Multiplanar computed tomography images were evaluated by 2 independent observers to assess fusion success at 24 months using a 4-point grading scale. In addition to reviewing the medical records to identify any complications, all of the sites were queried regarding any device-related adverse events that may have occurred. RESULTS: According to the radiographic analysis, the arthrodesis rates recorded for the ALIF and AxiaLIF cohorts were 79% and 85%, respectively (P>0.05). The numbers and types of adverse events recorded for these procedures appeared to be similar although there was 1 serious intraoperative complication (iliac artery laceration) noted in the ALIF group. CONCLUSIONS: The radiographic success and adverse events associated with AxiaLIF appear to be similar to that observed for ALIF, suggesting that this technique represents a safe and effective method for achieving an interbody fusion across the L5-S1 disk space when utilized in conjunction with posterior fixation.

Radiation dose from digital breast tomosynthesis screening - A comparison with full field digital mammography.

OBJECTIVES: To compare Mean Glandular Dose (MGD) and effective dose from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening with that from full field digital mammography (FFDM) screening. METHOD: To simulate compressed breasts, two Perspex-polyethylene breast phantoms were used, one phantom for compressed breast in craniocaudal and the other for compressed breast in mediolateral oblique. An adult ATOM dosimetry phantom was loaded with high sensitivity thermoluminescence dosimeters; the phantom was then positioned on Hologic Selenia Dimensions mammographic machine to imitate DBT and 4-view FFDM screening. Organ radiation doses were measured from 4-view DBT and 4-view FFDM (craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views for each breast). Organ radiation doses were used to calculate effective dose from one screening session. RESULTS: MGD for DBT was 3.6 mGy; MGD for FFDM was 2.8 mGy. For DBT, other organs (e.g. thymus, lungs, salivary glands, thyroid, contralateral breast and bone marrow) radiation dose was also higher than for FFDM. The use of DBT for breast cancer screening increases the effective dose (E) of one screening session by 22%. E for DBT was 0.44 mSv; E for FFDM was 0.34 mSv. CONCLUSION: The use of DBT for breast cancer screening increases the radiation dose to screening clients.

Impact of Contralateral Breast Shielding on the Risk of Developing Radiation-induced Cancer from Full-field Digital Mammography Screening.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of contralateral breast shielding on the risk of developing radiation-induced cancer from four-view full-field digital mammography (FFDM) screening. METHODS: A poly methyl methacrylate-polyethylene breast phantom and adult ATOM dosimetry phantom were used to measure organ dose on four FFDM machines using craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections for each breast. A lead rubber shield of 0.25 mm equivalent lead thickness was used to protect the contralateral breast. Organs dose, effective dose, and effective risk were calculated. For effective risk estimations, the impact of the shield was considered for the routine screening views. RESULTS: The contralateral breast dose was reduced by more than 95%. For each FFDM machine, contralateral breast dose reduction in µGy were 35.20 reduced to 1.93, 41.40 reduced to 0.01, 22.85 reduced to 1.24, and 22.76 reduced to 1.66. Effective risk reduction was significant (P < .05). For all FFDM machines, a small reduction was identified in sternum bone marrow dose due to the use of contralateral breast shield. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study demonstrate the value of a contralateral breast shield. More research is required to determine whether such a shield has clinical utility.

Mathematical modelling of radiation-induced cancer risk from breast screening by mammography.

OBJECTIVES: Establish a method to determine and convey lifetime radiation risk from FFDM screening. METHODS: Radiation risk from screening mammography was quantified using effective risk (number of radiation-induced cancer cases/million). For effective risk calculations, organ doses and examined breast MGD were used. Screening mammography was simulated by exposing a breast phantom for cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique for each breast using 16 FFDM machines. An ATOM phantom loaded with TLD dosimeters was positioned in contact with the breast phantom to simulate the client's body. Effective risk data were analysed using SPSS software to establish a regression model to predict the effective risk of any screening programme. Graphs were generated to extrapolate the effective risk of all screening programmes for a range of commencement ages and time intervals between screens. RESULTS: The most important parameters controlling clients' total effective risk within breast screening are the screening commencement age and number of screens (correlation coefficients were -0.865 and 0.714, respectively). Since the tissue radio-sensitivity reduces with age, the end age of screening does not result in noteworthy effect on total effective risk. CONCLUSIONS: The regression model can be used to predict the total effective risk for clients within breast screening but it cannot be used for exact assessment of total effective risk. Graphical representation of risk could be an easy way to represent risk in a fashion which might be helpful to clients and clinicians.

Functional and radiographic outcomes after surgery for adult scoliosis using third-generation instrumentation techniques.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective radiograph and chart review of 28 patients with adult idiopathic scoliosis undergoing primary corrective surgery. Clinical and radiographic parameters were assessed before surgery, after surgery, and at a 2-year follow-up assessment. A self-perceived outcome questionnaire was administered to the study patients at a minimum 2-year follow-up assessment. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient outcomes after surgery for adult scoliosis using traditional radiographic parameters along with a self-perceived outcomes questionnaire. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The clinical and radiographic results and the outcomes for the surgical treatment of adult idiopathic scoliosis have not been established in the literature with respect to the use of modern third-generation instrumentation techniques. Most studies reviewing the surgical treatment of adult idiopathic scoliosis look primarily at Harrington instrumentation techniques. METHODS: Records and radiographs were reviewed retrospectively for all the patients (n = 54) undergoing primary corrective surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis between December 30, 1994 and December 30, 1997. Of the 54 patients reviewed, 28 (52%) met the following inclusion criteria: age exceeding 20 years, primary surgery, fusion above the sacrum, availability of medical records along with preoperative, postoperative, and 2-year follow-up radiographs. Additionally, a self-perceived outcomes questionnaire was administered to these patients at a minimum 2-year follow-up assessment. RESULTS: All the patients were women (28/28). The indications for surgery were pain and progression in 54% (15/28) and pain in 29% (8/28) of the patients. The average preoperative major curve measurement was 65 degrees (range, 38-98 degrees ). The average postoperative major curve measurement was 24 degrees (range, 5-59 degrees ), for a correction of 64%. The average follow-up curve measurement was 27 degrees (range, 3-60 degrees ), for a correction of 61%. Whereas 71% of the cases were anteroposterior, 29% were posterior only. There was one intraoperative complication among the 28 patients and four postoperative complications in 3 of the 28 patients. The self-perceived outcome questionnaires were available for 83% (23/28) of the patients. Definite or probable relief of symptoms was reported in 74%(17/23). Improved ability to sleep was reported in 61% (14/23), and ability to return to their usual job was reported in 57% (13/23). Satisfaction with the results of surgery was reported in 87% (20/23). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis using third-generation instrumentation techniques provides significant clinical improvement, scoliosis correction, maintenance of sagittal alignment, and patient satisfaction, with an acceptable complication rate.