Clinical pharmacology applications in clinical drug development and clinical care: A focus on Saudi Arabia.

Drug development, from preclinical to clinical studies, is a lengthy and complex process. There is an increased interest in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) to promote innovation, research and local content including clinical trials (Phase I-IV). Currently, there are over 650 registered clinical trials in Saudi Arabia, and this number is expected to increase. An important part of drug development and clinical trials is to assure the safe and effective use of drugs. Clinical pharmacology plays a vital role in informed decision making during the drug development stage as it focuses on the effects of drugs in humans. Disciplines such as pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenomics are components of clinical pharmacology. It is a growing discipline with a range of applications in all phases of drug development, including selecting optimal doses for Phase I, II and III studies, evaluating bioequivalence and biosimilar studies and designing clinical studies. Incorporating clinical pharmacology in research as well as in the requirements of regulatory agencies will improve the drug development process and accelerate the pipeline. Clinical pharmacology is also applied in direct patient care with the goal of personalizing treatment. Tools such as therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacogenomics and model informed precision dosing are used to optimize dosing for patients at an individual level. In KSA, the science of clinical pharmacology is underutilized and we believe it is important to raise awareness and educate the scientific community and healthcare professionals in terms of its applications and potential. In this review paper, we provide an overview on the use and applications of clinical pharmacology in both drug development and clinical care.

External Validation of Obese/Critically Ill Vancomycin Population Pharmacokinetic Models in Critically Ill Patients Who Are Obese.

Obesity combined with critical illness might increase the risk of acquiring infections and hence mortality. In this patient population the pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials vary significantly, making antimicrobial dosing challenging. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive performance of published population pharmacokinetic models of vancomycin in patients who are critically ill or obese for a cohort of critically ill patients who are obese. This was a multi-center retrospective study conducted at 2 hospitals. Adult patients with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 were included. PubMed was searched for published population pharmacokinetic studies in patients who were critically ill or obese. External validation was performed using Monolix software. A total of 4 models were identified in patients who were obese and 5 models were identified in patients who were critically ill. In total, 138 patients who were critically ill and obese were included, and the most accurate models for these patients were the Goti and Roberts models. In our analysis, models in patients who were critically ill outperformed models in patients who were obese. When looking at the most accurate models, both the Goti and the Roberts models had patient characteristics similar to ours in terms of age and creatinine clearance. This indicates that when selecting the proper model to apply in practice, it is important to account for all relevant variables, besides obesity.

Critical assessment of the revised guidelines for vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: The revised vancomycin guidelines recommend replacing trough-only with trough or peak/trough Bayesian and first-order equations monitoring, citing their better AUC predictions and poor AUC-trough R2. Yet, evidence suggesting good AUC-trough correlation has been overlooked, and the optimality of peak/trough samples has been doubted. The guidelines recommend Bayesian programs implement richly-sampled PopPK priors despite their scarcity. Therefore, whether complex Bayesian and sample-demanding first-order equations can bring significant advantages to the practice over simple trough-only monitoring is worth weighing. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim is to compare the predictive performance of the AUC monitoring methods. Then, we investigate the impact of not adhering to trough sampling on the Bayesian-based predictions. Moreover, we report the nature of PopPK priors used in Bayesian programs to assess the applicability of the guideline recommendations. METHODS: We calculated the predictive performance of the monitoring methods using a standard PopPK modeling and simulation approach. We thoroughly explored the prior PK models implemented in Bayesian programs. RESULTS: Predictive performances of the monitoring methods were comparable at steady-state relative to the number of samples. Contrary to the recommendation, Bayesian trough monitoring did not result in better predictive performances compared to using random levels. Very few programs implemented richly-sampled priors. CONCLUSION: All the monitoring methods can be, relatively, reliable at steady-state, if properly implemented. Although only Bayesian-based monitoring can be used pre-steady-state, its predictive performance can be modest. Trough-only monitoring is the simplest approach. Constraints regarding trough sampling times could be relaxed. The scarcity of richly-sampled Bayesian priors questions the applicability of the revised guidelines recommendation.

An Update on Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses of Vancomycin, Part II: In Pediatric Patients.

Vancomycin is widely used in pediatric patients, however, large inter- and intraindividual variability are observed in vancomycin pharmacokinetics, affecting proper therapeutic monitoring. This review aimed at providing a comprehensive synthesis of the population pharmacokinetic models of vancomycin in pediatric patients and identifying potential factors responsible for the variability observed in various subpopulations. We conducted a literature search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases to obtain population pharmacokinetic studies for vancomycin published between January 2011 and January 2020, which resulted in a total of 33 studies. Vancomycin pharmacokinetics were generally characterized using a one-compartment model (n = 27), while a two-compartment model was used in six studies. The median (interquartile range) of the typical vancomycin clearance (CL) and the total volume of distribution adjusted to the median or mean body weight of the respective study was 0.103 L/h/kg (0.071-0.125) and 0.64 L/kg (0.59-1.03), respectively. Median weight-adjusted CL between different child age groups, such as infants and adolescents, did not appear to vary significantly, although the sample size for many age groups was very small. Examples of the conditions with relatively abnormal vancomycin pharmacokinetic values include renal insufficiency, sepsis, hematological and solid malignancy, and hypothermia treatment. Factors influencing pediatric vancomycin pharmacokinetics after adjusting for size and maturation include various renal function descriptors and some case-specific variables such as dialysate flow rate, ultrafiltrate output, and hypothermia. This review was able to document possible variables explaining the high variability observed in certain subpopulations and contrast vancomycin pharmacokinetics in different pediatric subpopulations.

Pharmacokinetic equations versus Bayesian guided vancomycin monitoring: Pharmacokinetic model and model-informed precision dosing trial simulations.

The recently released revised vancomycin consensus guideline endorsed area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) guided monitoring. Means to AUC-guided monitoring include pharmacokinetic (PK) equations and Bayesian software programs, with the latter approach being preferable. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of these two methods when monitoring using troughs or peaks and troughs at varying single or mixed dosing intervals (DIs), and evaluate the significance of satisfying underlying assumptions of steady-state and model transferability. Methods included developing a vancomycin population PK model and conducting model-informed precision dosing clinical trial simulations. A one-compartment PK model with linear elimination, exponential between-subject variability, and mixed (additive and proportional) residual error model resulted in the best model fit. Conducted simulations demonstrated that Bayesian-guided AUC can, potentially, outperform that of equation-based AUC predictions depending on the quality of model diagnostics and met assumptions. Ideally, Bayesian-guided AUC predictive performance using a trough from the first DI was equivalent to that of PK equations using two measurements (peak and trough) from the fifth DI. Model transferability diagnostics can guide the selection of Bayesian priors but are not strong indicators of predictive performance. Mixed versus single fourth and/or fifth DI sampling seems indifferent. This study illustrated cases associated with the most reliable AUC predictions and showed that only proper Bayesian-guided monitoring is always faster and more reliable than equations-guided monitoring in pre-steady-state DIs in the absence of a loading dose. This supports rapid Bayesian monitoring using data as sparse and early as a trough at the first DI.

An Update on Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses of Vancomycin, Part I: In Adults.

Despite the wide clinical use of vancomycin, controversy remains regarding its optimal dosage regimens. This can be attributed to the large between- and within-subject variability in the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin. This review aimed at providing a synthesis of population pharmacokinetic models of vancomycin in adults, determining the most reported pharmacokinetic models, and identifying various sources of variability in different special subpopulations to better inform vancomycin dosing. We searched PubMed and EMBASE for population pharmacokinetic studies of vancomycin published from January 2011 to May 2019. Inspection of the relevant lists of references was conducted, as well. This search resulted in a total of 30 eligible studies, which were included. One-, two-, and three-compartments models were reported to best describe vancomycin population pharmacokinetics in 13, 14, and 3 studies, respectively. Three-compartment models were implemented in three studies to account for an additional cerebrospinal fluid compartment. The most common predictors were creatinine clearance and bodyweight, in 20 and 13 studies, respectively. Estimated values of vancomycin clearance and total volume of distribution varied widely from 0.334 to 8.75 L/h (0.0054-0.1279 L/h/kg) and from 7.12 to 501.8 L (0.097-6.97 L/kg), respectively. Almost all studies implemented an exponential interindividual variability model, and the highest variability on clearance was 99.2%. In conclusion, this review highlights the wide ranges and the high variability of estimated population pharmacokinetic parameters. This information can help guide dosing in different subpopulations. Yet, additional analyses with pooled subpopulations might be needed to confirm the necessity of modified dosage regimens.