RESUMO
PURPOSE: We conducted an observational study to investigate the opinions of neurologists and psychiatrists all around the world who are taking care of patients with seizures [epilepsy and functional seizures (FS)]. METHODS: Practicing neurologists and psychiatrists from around the world were invited to participate in an online survey. On 29th September 2022, an e-mail including a questionnaire was sent to the members of the International Research in Epilepsy (IR-Epil) Consortium. The study was closed on 1st March 2023. The survey, conducted in English, included questions about physicians' opinions about FS and anonymously collected data. RESULTS: In total, 1003 physicians from different regions of the world participated in the study. Both neurologists and psychiatrists identified "seizures" as their preferred term. Overall, the most preferred modifiers for "seizures" were "psychogenic" followed by "functional" by both groups. Most participants (57.9%) considered FS more difficult to treat compared to epilepsy. Both psychological and biological problems were considered as the underlying cause of FS by 61% of the respondents. Psychotherapy was considered the first treatment option for patients with FS (79.9%). CONCLUSION: Our study represents the first large-scale attempt of investigating physicians attitudes and opinions about a condition that is both frequent and clinically important. It shows that there is a broad spectrum of terms used by physicians to refer to FS. It also suggests that the biopsychosocial model has gained its status as a widely used framework to interpret and inform clinical practice on the management of patients.
Assuntos
Epilepsia , Psiquiatria , Humanos , Neurologistas/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Epilepsia/terapia , Epilepsia/etiologia , Atitude , Eletroencefalografia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: While several studies have compared the feasibility and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for distal large-vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes in patients, few studies have compared MT with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) alone. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness and safety between MT and standard medical management with IVT alone for patients with distal LVOs. METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched in order to identify studies that directly compared MT with IVT for distal LVOs (anterior cerebral artery A2, middle cerebral artery M3-4, and posterior cerebral artery P2-4). Primary outcomes of interest included a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 at 90 days posttreatment, occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and all-cause mortality at 90 days posttreatment. RESULTS: Four studies representing a total of 381 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results indicated that the proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.23-5.93; p = 0.861), the occurrence of sICH (OR 2.45, 95% CI 0.75-8.03; p = 0.140), and the mortality rate at 90 days (OR 1.73, 95% CI 0.66-4.55; p = 0.263) did not differ between patients who underwent MT and those who received IVT alone. CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis did not demonstrate a significant difference between MT and standard medical management with regard to favorable outcome, occurrence of sICH, or 90-day mortality. Prospective clinical trials are needed to further compare the efficacy of MT with IVT alone for distal vessel occlusion.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica , Trombólise Mecânica , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Trombectomia , Terapia Trombolítica , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Objective: Post-stroke seizures (PSS) are one of the major stroke-related complications. Early therapeutic interventions are critical therefore using electroencephalography (EEG) as a predictive tool for future recurrence may be helpful. We aimed to assess frequencies of different EEG patterns in patients with PSS and their association with seizure recurrence and functional outcomes. Methods: All patients admitted with PSS were included and underwent interictal EEG recording during their admission and monitored for seizure recurrence for 24 months. Results: PSS was reported in 106 patients. Generalized slow wave activity (GSWA) was the most frequent EEG pattern observed (n = 62, 58.5%), followed by Focal sharp wave discharges (FSWDs) (n = 57, 55.8%), focal slow wave activity (FSWA) (n = 56, 52.8%), periodic discharges (PDs) (n = 13, 12.3%), and ictal epileptiform abnormalities (n = 6, 5.7%). FSWA and ictal EAs were positively associated with seizure recurrence (p < .001 and p = .015 respectively) and it remained significant even after adjusting for age, sex, stroke severity, stroke subtype, or use of anti-seizure medications (ASMs). Other positive associations were status epilepticus (SE) (p = .015), and use of older ASM (p < .001). FSWA and GSWA in EEG were positively associated with severe functional disability (p = .055, p = .015 respectively). Other associations were; Diabetes Mellitus (p = .034), Chronic Kidney Disease (p = .002), use of older ASMs (p = .037), presence of late PSS (p = .021), and those with Ischemic stroke (p = .010). Conclusions: Recognition and documentation of PSS-related EEG characteristics are important, as certain EEG patterns may help to identify the patients who are at risk of developing recurrence or worse functional outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Activation procedures (APs) are adopted during routine electroencephalography (rEEG) to provoke interictal epileptiform abnormalities (EAs). This study aimed to observe interictal and ictal (EAs) of different EEG patterns, provoked by various APs. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was performed in the neurology department of King Fahd hospital of university, Saudi Arabia. The EEGs and medical records of patients who presented for EEG recordings were screened initially, then 146 EEGs provoked EAs due to utilization of APs, were included for analysis. RESULTS: Among all EEGs with provoked EAs, Non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) provoked EAs in 93 (63.7%) patients with following patterns, focal spike wave discharges (FSWDs) 45 (P= 0.01), focal spike wave discharges with bilateral synchrony (FSWDBS) 27 (P=0.03) and generalized spike wave discharges (GSWDs) 46 (P=0.01). Intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) most significantly provoked FSWDs in 07 patient (P =0.01) and GSWDs in 30 patients (P=<0.001) 7 patients (P = 0.01) and GSWDs in 30 patients (P < 0.001). Hyperventilation (HV) was associated with a higher occurrence of GSWDs in 37 patients (P =0.01). Female sex 7 (P = 0.02), provoked GSWDs 3 (P = 0.03), NREM sleep 8 (P = 0.04), prolonged EEG record 3 (P = 0.02), clinical events during recording 5 (P ≤ 0.01), diagnosis of genetic 05 (P = 0.03), and immune-mediated epilepsies 2 (P = 0.001) were associated with the provocation of ictal EAs; however, in multiple logistic regression analysis, no statistically significant association of these variables (P ≥ 0.05 each) was noted. CONCLUSION: The provocation of EAs in rEEG with different APs varies according to circumstances, including seizure types, epilepsy etiology, and the type of AP applied. These clinical and procedural parameters affect the diagnostic yield of rEEG and need careful consideration during rEEG recordings. APs adopted during rEEG recording can induce FSWDs, FSWDBS, and GSWDs in the form of either interictal or ictal EAs in various etiologies of epilepsy. Ictal EAs may appear in the form of GSWDs, during NREM sleep, in prolonged EEG records; however, their independent association needs to be evaluated in larger sample studies. Further, prospective cohort studies with adequate sample sizes are warranted.
Résumé Contexte:Des procédures d'activation (AP) sont adoptées lors d'une électroencéphalographie de routine (rEEG) pour provoquer des anomalies épileptiformes (EA) intercritiques. Cette étude visait à observer les inter-critiques et critiques (EA) de différents modèles EEG, provoqués par divers PA.Méthodes:Cette étude transversale a été réalisée dans le département de neurologie de l'hôpital universitaire King Fahd de Khobar, en Arabie Saoudite. Les EEG et les dossiers médicaux des patients qui se sont présentés pour des enregistrements EEG ont été initialement examinés, puis 146 EEG avec des EA provoqués lors de l'utilisation des AP ont été inclus pour analyse.Résultats:Parmi tous les EEG avec des AE provoqués, le sommeil à mouvements oculaires non rapides (NREM) a provoqué des EA chez 93 (63,7 %) patients avec les schémas suivants : décharges d'ondes de pointe focales (FSWD) 45 ( P = 0,01), onde de pointe focale avec bilatéral synchronisation (FSWBS) 27 ( P = 0,03) et décharges d'ondes de pointe généralisées (GSWD) 46 ( P = 0,01). La stimulation photique intermittente (IPS) a provoqué de manière plus significative des FSWD chez 07 patients ( P = 0,01) et des GSWD chez 30 patients ( P = < 0,001) 7 patients ( P = 0,01) et des GSWD chez 30 patients ( P < 0,001). L'hyperventilation (HV) était associée à une fréquence plus élevée de GSWD chez 37 patients ( P = 0,01). Sexe féminin 07 ( P = 0,02), GSWD provoqués 03 ( P = 0,03), sommeil NREM 08 ( P = 0,04), enregistrement EEG prolongé 03 ( P = 0,02), événements cliniques lors de l'enregistrement 05 ( P = < 0,01), diagnostic des épilepsies génétiques 05 ( P = 0,03) et des épilepsies à médiation immunitaire 02 ( P = 0,001) étaient associées à la provocation d'EA critiques, cependant, dans l'analyse de régression logistique multiple, aucune association statistiquement significative de ces variables ( P = > 0,05 chacune) était noté.Conclusion:La provocation d'EA dans l'EEGr avec différents AP varie en fonction des circonstances, notamment des types de crises, de l'étiologie de l'épilepsie et du type d'AP appliqué. Ces paramètres cliniques et procéduraux affectent le rendement diagnostique du rEEG et doivent être soigneusement pris en compte lors des enregistrements rEEG. Les AP adoptés lors de l'enregistrement rEEG peuvent induire des FSWD, des FSWBS et des GSWD sous la forme d'EA inter-critiques ou critiques dans diverses étiologies de l'épilepsie. Les EA critiques peuvent apparaître sous forme de GSWD, pendant le sommeil NREM, dans les enregistrements EEG prolongés; cependant, leur association indépendante doit être évaluée dans des études sur un échantillon plus large. De plus, des études de cohortes prospectives avec des échantillons de taille adéquate sont justifiées.
Assuntos
Eletroencefalografia , Epilepsia , Convulsões , Humanos , Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Feminino , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Epilepsia/fisiopatologia , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Arábia Saudita , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Convulsões/diagnóstico , Convulsões/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED; MicroVention) is a dual-layered flow diverter used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The objective of this systematic review was to compile device-related safety and effectiveness data. METHODS: The literature from January 1, 2013 to April 30, 2021 was searched for studies describing use of the FRED for intracranial aneurysm treatment irrespective of aneurysm location and morphology. The review included anterior and posterior circulation ruptured and unruptured saccular, fusiform or dissection, and blister aneurysms. MeSH terms related to "flow re-direction endoluminal device" and "FRED for aneurysms" were used. Data related to indication, complications, and rates of aneurysm occlusion were retrieved and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies with 1729 intracranial aneurysms were included in this review. Overall reported morbidity was 3.9% (range 0-20%). Overall procedure-related mortality was 1.4% (range 0-6%). Complication rates fell into 5 categories: technical (3.6%), ischemic (3.8%), thrombotic or stenotic (6%), hemorrhagic (1.5%), and non-neurological (0.8%). The aneurysm occlusion rate between 0 and 3 months (reported in 11 studies) was 47.8%. The occlusion rate between 4 and 6 months (reported in 14 studies) was 73.8%. Occlusion rates continued to increase to 75.1% at 7-12 months (reported in 10 studies) and 86.6% for follow-up beyond 1 year (reported in 10 studies). CONCLUSION: This review indicated that the FRED is a safe and effective for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Future studies should directly compare the FRED with other flow diverters for a better understanding of comparative safety and effectiveness among the different devices.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Aneurisma Intracraniano , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/diagnóstico por imagem , Aneurisma Intracraniano/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Combined central and peripheral demyelination (CCPD) is not encountered frequently in the clinical practice, and it requires a high level of suspicion for diagnosis. We describe a case of a young man who was diagnosed with radiologically isolated syndrome (RIS) after presenting initially with symptoms suggestive of central nervous system (CNS) insult in the form of double vision, slurred speech, left-sided numbness, and unsteadiness. However, on the next day of admission, his neurological examination was remarkable for ataxia, areflexia, and ophthalmoplegia, the typical triad of Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS). After confirming both diagnoses, the final diagnosis of CCPD was made. The challenges one may face to diagnose and treat CCPD urge sharing of similar cases to open the door for further extensive and thorough investigations and to encourage further studies and analysis of available data to come up with consolidated management guidelines for rare disorders.
RESUMO
Epilepsy should be suspected in patients with Stiff-person syndrome and new onset paroxysmal episodes. Musicogenic epilepsy may be a manifestation of anti-GAD-Ab spectrum, supporting an autoimmune workup in these patients. Appropriate treatment is not well established, and immunotherapy should be considered in patients with only partial response to antiepileptic drugs.