Economic comparisons of endoscopic spine surgery: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Full-endoscopic techniques are minimally invasive surgery alternatives to traditional spinal surgery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the costs of these techniques compared to traditional approaches. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed for economic evaluations that compare endoscopic decompressions of the lumbar spine for stenosis or disc herniation to open or microsurgical decompressions. The search was performed in the following databases: Medline, Embase Classic, Embase, and Central Cochrane library, from January 1, 2005, to October 22, 2022. The included studies were each evaluated according to a formal assessment checklist to evaluate the quality of economic evaluations based on 35 criteria. RESULT: A total of 1153 studies were identified, with 9 articles included in the final analysis. In evaluating the quality of economic evaluations, the study with the fewest met criteria scored 9/35 and the study with the most met criteria scored 28/35. Only 3 studies completed cost-effectiveness analyses. Surgical procedure duration varied between studies, but hospital length of stays were consistently shorter with endoscopy. While endoscopy was more frequently associated with higher operating costs, studies that measured healthcare and societal costs found endoscopy to be advantageous. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic spine surgery was found to be cost-effective in treating patients with lumbar stenosis and disc herniation when compared to standard microscopic approaches from a societal perspective. More well-designed economic evaluations investigating the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic spine procedures are needed to further support these findings.

The Role of Nursing Care in the Management of External Ventricular Drains on the Neurosurgical Ward: A Quality Improvement Project.

OBJECTIVE: The management of external ventricular drains (EVDs) is a critical aspect of patient care in the intensive care setting. However, nurses on the general floor are not commonly exposed to patients with EVD and therefore lack the necessary knowledge and skills to manage and troubleshoot EVDs effectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of knowledge, comfort, and impact of EVD management among nurses on the floor after the implementation of a quality improvement (QI) tool. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted among registered nurses working on the neurosurgical floors of the Montreal Neurological Hospital. Data were collected using a questionnaire based on the plan-do-study-act model. A survey assessing the level of knowledge and comfort with EVD management was conducted before and after the implementation of the QI tool. RESULTS: Seventy-six nurses completed the questionnaire regarding their knowledge and comfort level in EVD management. Results showed that only 42% of the nurses reported feeling "comfortable" whereas 37% reported feeling "uncomfortable" in caring for patients with an EVD. In addition, only 6.5% reported being "comfortable" in troubleshooting a malfunctioning EVD. However, the level of comfort significantly improved after using the QI project. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study highlight the need for continued training and education to support the care of patients with EVDs in the ward setting. The implementation of a QI tool can significantly improve nurses' knowledge and comfort level in EVD management, leading to improved patient outcomes and overall quality of care.

Paramedics beliefs and attitudes towards pre-hospital thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction is the third leading cause of death in the developing countries. Thrombolysis as a reperfusion therapy is shown to have a great role in decreasing mortality. The efficacy of thrombolytic therapy lies in its ability to reduce the duration of occlusion by early administration. Many of the studies have supported pre-hospital thrombolysis (PHT) therapy and proven that it is beneficial in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. METHODOLOGY: Questionnaires adopted from studies of Humphrey et al., were distributed to paramedics in Saudi Red Crescent Authority and Emergency Medical Services Departments at King Abdulaziz Medical City, King Fahad Medical City, Prince Sultan Medical Military City and Security Forces Hospital in Riyadh. A total of 7 questions were about the knowledge of risk and benefit of PHT and 12 questions were about the beliefs and attitudes of paramedics toward PHT in AMI patients. RESULTS: The response rate was 87%. Nearly 72% were believed to be capable of performing PHT, 87% are confident about recording 12-lead electrocardiogram in pre-hospital settings and 77% are confident in the interpretation. 94% believe that PHT will have a significant impact on pain to needle time. 77% consider PHT to be safe for use by paramedics. 66% preferred on-line medical direction or telemedicine linked with the supervision of a physician. Regarding the knowledge part, majority gave a correct answer, but the major concern was that 43% of the paramedics overestimated direct relation of bleeding to thrombolysis therapy. CONCLUSION: Majority of paramedics in Riyadh support the principle of PHT in patients with AMI via online medical direction. They believe that they are confident in their ability to administer PHT despite the concern of authorities on their level of training, the related risks and medico-legal issues. Nevertheless, since the total duration of PHT course for paramedics is just 2 days, we consider that the procedure should be performed under expert supervision until they achieve expertise.