[Comparison of Real Time PCR Cycle Threshold Values in Symptomatic and Asymptomatic COVID-19 Patients]. / Semptomatik ve Asemptomatik COVID-19 Hastalarinda Gerçek Zamanli PCR Döngü Esik Degerlerinin Karsilastirilmasi.

Patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) show different clinical courses ranging from asymptomatic to severe infection requiring intensive care treatment and death. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), used in the diagnosis, screening and surveillance of coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19), provides the viral load as a cycle threshold (Ct) value. It has been reported that the Ct value may be related to the course of the infection and the clinical condition of the patient. In this study, it was aimed to compare the Ct and C reactive-protein (CRP) results of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who were found to be positive with rRT-PCR. Between 14 April and 29 August 2020, a total of 355 patients aged 18 years and older with positive SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR test were included in the study. The COVID-19 rRT-PCR test was performed with Bio-speedy SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR kit (Bioeksen, Turkey) versions, the kit targeting the RdRp gene region, and the dual gene kit versions targeting the N and ORF1ab gene regions were used. Patients were classified as symptomatic and asymptomatic according to their clinical findings. Ct and CRP results of the patients were analyzed statistically. Of the 355 patients included in the study, 237 (66.7%) were symptomatic and 118 (33.2%) were asymptomatic patients. The mean age of symptomatic patients (46.68 ± 18.03) was observed significantly higher than asymptomatic patients (38.27 ± 13.82) (p<0.001). When the patients are evaluated according to the age groups, the rate of asymptomatic patients was significantly higher in the 21-39 age group, while the rate of symptomatic patients was significantly higher in 65 years and older group (p<0.05). The rate of comorbidity was significantly higher in symptomatic patients (n= 69, 29.1%) than in asymptomatic patients (n= 11, 9.3%) (p<0.001). Hypertension (12.2%), diabetes mellitus (9.7%), chronic respiratory disease (9.3%) and cardiovascular diseases (5.5%) were the most common diseases in symptomatic patients. However, among these, hypertension and chronic respiratory disease were found significantly higher in symptomatic patients (p<0.05). Increased CRP rate in symptomatic patients (64.6%) was found significantly higher than asymptomatic patients (27.3%) (p<0.001). The median of Ct value was found significantly higher in asymptomatic patients (26.34, IQR= 19.78-35.48), than in symptomatic patients (21.77, IQR= 17.81-26.51) (p<0.001). Regarding the medians of Ct values obtained from target genes; RdRp gene Ct value was found significantly higher in asymptomatic patients than in symptomatic patients (p<0.001). However, no statistical difference was found between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in the ORF1ab and N genes Ct value medians (p> 0.05). As a result, it was observed that SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients were symptomatic in the presence of advanced age and comorbidity. Increased CRP value at the time of admission to the hospital was found significantly higher in symptomatic patients. Ct value has been shown to be lower in symptomatic patients, as expected. Although Ct and CRP values are thought to be useful in monitoring the clinical course and prognosis of patients with COVID-19, more detailed studies are needed to prove their clinical value.

Characteristics and outcomes of 974 COVID-19 patients in intensive care units in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: In our previous report on Turkish COVID-19 patients requiring intensive care, the 24 patients in a single ICU were elderly and mortality was high. We extended our analysis to include patients admitted to ten ICUs. OBJECTIVES: Report the demographics, clinical features, imaging findings, comorbidities, and outcomes in COVID-19 patients. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Intensive care unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study includes patients with clinical and radiological confirmed or laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection who were admitted to ten ICUs between 15 March and 30 June 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical outcomes, therapies, and death during hospitalization SAMPLE SIZE: 974, including 571 males (58%). RESULTS: The median age (range) was 72 (21-101) years for patients who died (n=632, 64.9%) and 70 (16-99) years for patients who lived (n=432, 35.2%) (P<.001). APACHE scores, and SOFA scores were higher in patients who died than in those who survived (P<.001, both comparisons). Respiratory failure was the most common cause of hospitalization (82.5%), and respiratory failure on admission was associated with death (P=.013). Most (n=719, 73.8%) underwent invasive mechanical ventilation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients admitted to the ICU with a diagnosis of COVID-19 require respiratory support. LIMITATIONS: Although the Turkish Ministry of Health made recommendations for the treatment of COVID-19 patients, patient management may not have been identical in all ten units. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Postoperative Respiratory Failure in a Patient with Undiagnosed Myastenia Gravis.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease caused by the development of antibodies against the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. There is hypersensitivity against non-depolarizing muscle relaxants in these patients. Sugammadex eliminates the effects of steroid non-depolarizing muscle relaxants, such as rocuronium and vecuronium, by selectively encapsulating their molecules. In this case report, we present a case of recurarization and respiratory failure after the use of sugammadex and rocuronium in a patient with preoperatively undiagnosed myasthenia gravis.

The comparison of the efficacy of scoring systems in organophosphate poisoning.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II scoring systems for organophosphate poisoning (OPP) in an intensive care unit (ICU). The following data were collected on all consecutive patients who were admitted to the ICU between June 1999 and December 2004. Demographic data, GCS, APACHE II and SAPS II scoring systems were recorded. Predicted mortality was calculated using original regression formulas. Standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was computed with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The sensitivity and specificity for each scoring system were evaluated by calculating the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves. The actual mortality in OPP was 21.9%. Predicted mortality by all systems was not significantly different from actual mortality [SMR and 95% CI for GCS: 1.00 (0.65 1.35), APACHE II: 0.87 (0.54-1.03), SAPS II: 1.40 (0.98-1.82)]. The area under the ROC curve for APACHE II is largest, but there is no statistically significant difference when compared with SAPS II and GCS (GCS 0.900 +/- 0.059, APACHE II 0.929 +/- 0.045 and SAPS II 0.891 +/- 0.057). In our ICU group of patients, in predicting the mortality rates in OPP, the three scoring systems, which are GCS, APACHE II and SAPS II, had similar impacts; however, GCS system has superiority over the other systems in being easy to perform, and not requiring complex physiologic parameters and laboratory methods.