Self-expanding metal stents versus antrectomy for the palliative treatment of obstructive adenocarcinoma of the gastric antrum.

BACKGROUND: gastric cancer patients are first diagnosed with an unresectable tumor in up to 40% of cases. Gastric outlet obstruction causes nausea, vomiting, dehydration and malnutrition. The aim of the study was to compare self-expanding metal stents to antrectomy and Roux-en Y gastrojejunostomy for palliation of obstructive adenocarcinoma of the gastric antrum. METHODS: retrospective study in patients with obstructing cancer of the gastric antrum. Patients were divided into two groups: group A, underwent endoscopic placement of self-expanding metal stents and group B underwent surgical treatment with antrectomy and Roux-en Y gastrojejunostomy. Collected data included: age, gender, performance status (Karnofsky's score), body mass index, histopathology, clinical stage (TNM classification), technical and clinical success of the procedure, time to oral intake, in-hospital stay, reintervention rate, and complications related to the treatment and survival. RESULTS: a total of 39 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were included, 21 male and 18 female. Nineteen patients were assigned to group A and 20 patients to group B. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in regards to age, body mass index, Karnofsky's score and clinical stage. The technical and clinical success was similar for both groups. There was a statistically significant difference between groups favoring self-expanding metal stent in time to oral intake (1 ± 0 vs. 4.9 ± 0.6 days, p = 0.0001) and in-hospital stay (0.94 ± 1.18 vs. 7.8 ± 7.7 days, p = 0.0005). We did not find statistically significant differences with regards to long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction due to gastric cancer, endoscopic palliation with self-expanding metal stents provide a shorter interval to oral intake, shorter in-hospital stay and lower rate of complications.

Argon plasma coagulation and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in chronic radiation proctopathy, effectiveness and impact on tissue toxicity.

BACKGROUND: chronic radiation proctopathy (CRP) is associated with recurrent rectal bleeding and transfusional requirements. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HOT) have been shown to be effective in the control of CRP. No prospective comparisons have been reported between these treatments. AIM: the aim was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and impact on tissue toxicity of APC compared to HOT in patients with CRP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a prospective study for evaluating treatment response was conducted. Patients with cervical cancer and CRP with rectal bleeding were recruited. They had not received previous treatment. Collected data included: demographics, previous radiation dosage, duration and severity of rectal bleeding. Hemoglobin, transfusional requirements, and tissue toxicity (SOMA LENT questionnaire) at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months follow up were recorded. RESULTS: thirty-one patients were included, 14 in the APC group and 17 in the HOT group. No response was noted in 13 and 18% of patients in the APC and HOT group respectively (p = NS). At the 1 and 2 months follow-up, the APC group showed a significantly better response in terms of transfusional requirements (0.6 vs. 3.4 and 0.7 vs. 2.5) and tissue toxicity score (5.3 vs. 8.6 and 3.8 vs. 7.248). After 3 months, both groups showed further improvement in all parameters without significant differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: APC and HOT were effective, safe and decreased the tissue toxicity scores in patients with CRP. However, response rate was higher and faster in the APC group.