RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Despite its extremely low incidence, intra-abdominal herniation through the lesser omentum is associated with a high mortality rate and must be recognized early and treated urgently. To overcome a lack of data on the management of this condition, we collected and reviewed all the reported cases of operated lesser omental hernia and presented the case of a patient treated by laparoscopy for an isolated lesser omental hernia. METHODS: According to PRISMA guidelines and using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, a systematic literature review of cases of lesser omental hernia treated by surgery was performed on February 12, 2023. RESULTS: Of 482 articles, 30 were included for analysis and only 9 articles presented an isolated hernia through the lesser omentum. Among these, 4 patients were female and the median age was 38. Upper abdominal pain and vomiting were reported in 7 out of 9 patients. The small bowel was responsible for 78% (7/9) of all lesser omental herniations. All of them were treated by laparotomy. In addition, we describe the case of a 65-year-old woman without prior surgical history who was treated by laparoscopy for a spontaneous closed loop hernia through the lesser omentum without any other associated hernias. CONCLUSION: Mostly associated with prior surgery or trauma, this type of herniation could sometimes occur spontaneously without any sign of peritonitis. Due to the high mortality rate, internal abdominal hernias should always be ruled out with a CT scan in front of patients presenting with persisting acute abdominal pain and no alternative diagnosis.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Omento , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Idoso , Masculino , Omento/cirurgia , Fígado , Dor Abdominal , HérniaRESUMO
Gustilo 3 lower limb fractures represent a significant challenge because of high complication risk. Two management strategies are commonly used for wound coverage until final closure: negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and conventional wound dressing (CWD), also described as standard wound coverage without subatmospheric pressure. Understanding their relative effectiveness is essential to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of NPWT and CWD in Gustilo 3 lower limb fracture management, with a focus on overall rates, superficial infection, and deep infection rates. A systematic review of medical research databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies comparing NPWT with CWD for Gustilo 3 fractures were included. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Treatment with CWD was associated with significantly higher rates of overall infection [pooled risk ratio (RR): 0.33; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.14-0.51] and pooled risk difference (RD: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.15-0.38), superficial infection (pooled RR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.04-0.66), and deep infection (pooled RR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.02-0.38) compared with NPWT treatment. Overall infection rate remained significantly higher in the CWD group after analyzing only open tibia fractures (pooled RR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.48). Nonunion rate was significant higher in the CWD group (pooled RR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.00-0.59). Flap failure rate was similar in both groups (pooled RR: 0.09; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.23). NPWT appears to be a reasonable option for wound management in Gustilo 3 lower limb fractures in terms of infection rates.
RESUMO
Abdominoplasty and its different approaches have been widely described to improve abdominal wall contour. However, the role of reverse abdominoplasty, a less commonly performed technique, and its indications are not fully understood. Recent advances in the understanding of the vascular supply to the anterior abdominal wall have made this technique more popular, but there is still limited information available in the literature. In this report, we present the case of a 52-year-old woman who underwent a reverse abdominoplasty using an existing subcostal scar from a previous nephrectomy. No surgical complications were observed, and the patient achieved both aesthetic and functional improvement after 6 months of follow-up. Reverse abdominoplasty can be a reliable option for maintaining adequate blood supply and achieving a satisfactory cosmetic result in cases where there is a pre-existing subcostal scar.
RESUMO
(1) Background: Due to its highly aggressive behavior, the ability to identify and manage Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) with a full understanding of its characteristics is essential. Because the external ear is an exposed area, resection can have dramatic consequences on patient's self-image, which is why it is fundamental to detect MCC, typically found on UV-exposed regions such as the ears, at an early stage. (2) Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for all external ear MCC between 2000 and 2019. A descriptive analysis based on frequencies was made to describe the demography of pathophysiologic features linked to MCC. Overall survival (OS) was studied and compared between variables with a log rank test. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was then computed to identify independent prognostic factors. (3) Results: A total of 210 patients (160 men) were identified with a median age of 80 years. The median OS was 47 months. Factors associated with lower OS included an age of over 80 years, the male gender, a tumor size of >5 cm, and metastatic disease. Gross (<1 cm) and wide (>1 cm) surgery excision margins were the surgery types with the best OS. (4) Conclusions: MCC of the external ear is diagnosed mostly in old men. Among the 182 patients who received a surgical procedure, gross and wide excision without radiotherapy were associated with the best OS.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The setting regarding the ideal timing for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) reconstruction remains unclear. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is performed at the same time as mastectomy, while delayed breast reconstruction (DBR) is performed at any time after mastectomy except immediately. We compared both strategies to assess whether IBR or DBR should be performed to reduce postoperative adverse events. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science was conducted, aiming at articles comparing the recipient site outcomes of IBR versus DBR with DIEP. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method with a fixed effects model. Results were expressed as the OR with a 95% CI. RESULTS: Two retrospective and two prospective studies were identified involving 5784 DIEPs (1744 immediate and 4040 delayed). We showed a significant difference in favor of IBR for wound healing issues (OR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.41, 0.77; p = 0.0003). However, no significant differences for hematoma, infection, fat necrosis, partial flap loss, and total flap loss rate were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variability in the choice of the ideal time for breast reconstruction and outcomes reported among studies, immediate DIEP surgery appears to be a reliable setting with less delayed healing issues.