Safety and Efficacy of Ketamine Without Intubation in the Management of Refractory Seizures: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Continuous infusion ketamine has demonstrated efficacy in the management of refractory seizures yet does not suppress respiratory drive like other continuous infusion anesthetics (CIAs) used for this indication. The aim of this study is to describe the safety and efficacy of ketamine infusions in patients with refractory seizure without intubation. METHODS: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of adult patients who were not intubated at the time of initiation of a ketamine infusion for refractory seizures. Seizure onset was determined to be the first clinical seizure or nonconvulsive seizure reported on electroencephalography (EEG) or the start time of EEG for patients with seizures at EEG initiation. Responders were defined as patients with resolution of seizures within 24 h of initiation without the need for intubation or an additional CIA. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were analyzed (median age 62 years, 64.3% female, 82.1% African American, 82.1% with structural seizure etiology, and 85.7% focal seizures). Of patients, 78.5% received an initial bolus averaging 0.9 mg/kg, and the majority (89.3%) were initiated on an infusion at 10 µg/kg/minute; median duration was 39.8 h. Maximum infusion rates were 10 µg/kg/minute in 16 patients, 20 µg/kg/minute in seven patients, and 30 µg/kg/minute in five patients. Of patients, 71.4% were assessed to be ketamine responders; six of the eight nonresponders required intubation and an additional CIA. Responders were 80% more likely to have received ketamine 5 or more hours earlier than nonresponders. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg) occurred in 31.8% of patients receiving only ketamine, which did not correlate with duration or maximum dose of ketamine; hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg) occurred in 39.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Ketamine represents a safe and effective treatment option for refractory seizures and has potential to reduce morbidity associated with intubation in a carefully selected patient population. Early initiation may increase the likelihood of success.

A Rare Case of Progressive Encephalopathy in a Sickle Cell Trait Patient: A Case Report.

Fat embolism syndrome (FES) is one of the underdiagnosed and underrecognized complications that can happen in multiple medical and surgical conditions. FES can manifest in a broad spectrum of signs and symptoms and affect multiple organ systems in the human body. One of the most commonly involved is the central nervous system (CNS), mainly the brain, which can be involved in different ways, and the presenting symptoms can vary in type and severity. One of the most common causes of FES is trauma, mainly a long bone fracture or any orthopedic injury. However, one of the rare causes of FES is sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassemia. Generalized and vague presenting symptoms, the rarity of FES, and the absence of well-defined diagnostic criteria make it a challenging diagnosis for healthcare practitioners. FES diagnosis is usually made after having a high index of suspicion in patients with underlying risk factors that can precipitate and contribute to the pathophysiology of FES. Moreover, the diagnosis is usually reached after excluding other more common and treatable conditions.