Is Delayed Time to Surgery Associated with Increased Short-term Complications in Patients with Pathologic Hip Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Delayed time to surgery of at least 2 days after hospital arrival is well known to be associated with increased complications after standard hip fracture surgery; whether this association is present for pathologic hip fractures, however, is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) After controlling for differences in patient characteristics, is delayed time to surgery (at least 2 days) for patients with pathologic hip fractures independently associated with increased complications compared with early surgery (fewer than 2 days)? (2) What preoperative factors are independently associated with major complications and mortality after surgery for pathologic hip fractures? METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database of pathologic hip fractures (including femoral neck, trochanteric, and subtrochanteric fractures) from 2007 to 2017. This database was chosen over other databases given the high-quality preoperative medical history and postoperative complication (including readmissions, reoperations, and mortality) data collected from patient medical records through the thirtieth postoperative day. Patients were identified using Common Procedural Terminology codes for hip fracture treatment (THA, hemiarthroplasty, proximal femur replacement, intramedullary nail, and plate and screw fixation) with associated operative diagnoses for pathologic fractures as identified with International Classification of Diseases codes. A total of 2627 patients with pathologic hip fractures were included in this study; 65% (1714) had surgery within 2 days and 35% (913) had surgery after that time. Patient demographics, hospitalization information, and 30-day postoperative complications were recorded. Differences in characteristics between patients who underwent surgery in the early and delayed time periods were assessed with chi-square tests for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Delayed-surgery patients were more medically complex at the time of admission than early-surgery patients, including having higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (mean ± SD 3.18 ± 0.61 versus 2.94 ± 0.60; p < 0.001) and prevalence of advanced, "disseminated" cancer (53% versus 39%; p < 0.001). Propensity-adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of delayed time to surgery alone on the various outcome measures. Additional independent risk factors for major complications and mortality were identified using backwards stepwise regressions. RESULTS: After controlling for baseline factors, the only outcome associated with delayed surgery was extended postoperative length of stay (odds ratio 1.94 [95% CI 1.62 to 2.33]; p < 0.001). Delayed surgery was not associated with any postoperative complications, including major complications (OR 1.23 [95% CI 0.94 to 1.6]; p = 0.13), pulmonary complications (OR 1.24 [95% CI 0.83 to 1.86]; p = 0.29), and mortality (OR 1.26 [95% CI 0.91 to 1.76]; p = 0.16). Histories of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.48), congestive heart failure (OR 2.64), and disseminated cancer (OR 1.68) were associated with an increased risk of major complications, while dependent functional status (OR 2.27), advanced American Society of Anesthesiologists class (IV+ versus I-II, OR 4.81), and disseminated cancer were associated with an increased risk of mortality (OR 2.2; p ≤ 0.002 for all). CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for baseline patient factors, delayed time to surgery was not independently associated with increased 30-day complications after surgical treatment of pathologic hip fractures. These results are in contrast to the traditional dogma for standard hip fractures that surgery within 2 days of hospital arrival is associated with reduced complications. Although surgery should not be delayed needlessly, if the surgeon feels that additional time could benefit the patient, the results of this study suggest surgeons should not expedite surgery because of the risk of surgical delay observed for standard hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Trends in the surgical treatment of pathological proximal femur fractures in the United States.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Large scale data on the treatment of pathologic proximal femur fractures (PPFFs) are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in patient demographics, complication rates, and relative utilization rates of various techniques associated with PPFFs. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for PPFFs from 2009 to 2017. Patient demographics, 30-day complications, and utilization rates were recorded. Trends in these variables were determined over the study period. RESULTS: Most patient demographics did not change during the study period. There were no trends toward decreasing rates of major complications (P = .82), reoperations (P = .65), non-home discharges (P = .17), readmissions (P = .07), or deaths (P = .75); transfusion rates significantly decreased (P < .001). Rates of hemiarthroplasty decreased (P = .03) and rates of intramedullary nailing increased (P = .001). DISCUSSION: Despite advances in cancer therapeutics, the average PPFF patient has not significantly changed over the past decade. Similarly, most short-term outcomes after PPFF surgery have not improved, demonstrating a need for improved perioperative protocols. Finally, rates of IMN fixation are increasing while rates of HA are falling at NSQIP hospitals. Given that orthopedic oncologists favor endoprosthetic reconstruction in most cases, there may be a need for increased communication between orthopedic oncologists and other members of the orthopedic community treating PPFFs.

Short-Term Morbidity and Mortality After Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty for Pathologic Proximal Femur Fractures.

BACKGROUND: As oncology patients have increasing life expectancies, total hip arthroplasty (THA) may become an important treatment option for pathologic proximal femur fractures (PPFFs). Although THA and hemiarthroplasty (HA) have been compared for native hip fracture treatment, no data on short-term morbidity and mortality are available in the pathologic setting. The purpose of this study is to compare short-term morbidity and mortality of HA vs THA for PPFFs. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2007 to 2017 for patients with PPFFs treated with HA or THA. Propensity-adjusted logistic regressions were implemented to compare 30-day morbidity and mortality between procedures. Backwards stepwise regression was then used to determine independent predictors of treatment with HA compared to THA. RESULTS: In adjusted analysis, THA was associated with longer operative times (120.3 ± 5.6 vs 98.7 ± 4.9 minutes, P < .001); however, there were no differences between THA and HA with regard to 30-day rates of major complications (P = .3), minor complications (P = .77), reoperations (P = .99), readmissions (P = .35), or deaths (P = .63). Older age (P < .001), dependent functional status (P = .02), and the presence of disseminated cancer (P = .049) were predictive of undergoing HA compared to THA. CONCLUSION: As patients with metastatic cancer continue to live longer with their disease, the durability of surgical reconstruction to treat PPFFs is becoming increasingly important. This study demonstrated no significant differences in 30-day complications between PPFF patients treated with THA or HA after controlling for underlying confounders. These results suggest that THA can be utilized to treat certain patients with PPFFs, and future work is warranted to examine long-term functional outcomes.