Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(3): e14761, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38628086

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Renal transplantation is currently the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the use of kidneys from donors under 6 years of age as a possibility to increase the organ pool in pediatric recipients remains a controversial matter. We aimed to investigate whether donor age is associated to the long-term functionality of the renal graft. Likewise, we analyzed the adaptation of the graft to the ascending functional requirements in the pediatric patient. METHODS: Retrospective study of the results obtained in pediatric recipients transplanted with grafts from donors between 3 and 6 years of age, comparing them with those of grafts from donors older than 6 years. Among the variables compared are cumulative graft survival, renal size, need for antiproteinuric therapy, GFR, incidence of rejection, pyelonephritis, renal failure and surgical or tumor complications. RESULTS: A total of 43 transplants were performed with donors aged 3-6 years, and 42 transplants with donors older than 6 years. Cumulative graft survival at 5 years was 81% for the younger donor group compared to 98% for the older donor group (p < .05). At 8 years, cumulative graft survival for donors <6 years was 74%. As for the mean estimated graft survival, it was 11.52 years for the younger donor group and 14.51 years for older donors. During follow-up, the younger donor group presented greater renal enlargement and need for antiproteinuric therapy. The older donors group had a higher GFR during the first year of follow-up, which then equalized in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of acute or chronic rejection, acute pyelonephritis, acute renal failure or surgical or tumor complications. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplants of grafts equal to or less than 6 years old have good short-term and acceptable long-term results in pediatric patients.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Transplante de Rim , Neoplasias , Pielonefrite , Criança , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doadores de Tecidos , Pielonefrite/etiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/etiologia , Fatores Etários
2.
Int J Urol ; 29(7): 692-697, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35340070

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Artificial urinary sphincter has been used to treat urinary incontinence in children with neuropathic bladder, although there are few studies reporting very long-term results. We assess our experience over the last 27 years in the management of artificial urinary sphincter. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in patients with neuropathic bladder in whom an artificial urinary sphincter was placed in our institution between 1994 and 2020. Demographic variables, pre- and post-artificial urinary sphincter implantation urodynamic studies, long-term outcomes, and postoperative complications were collected. RESULTS: An artificial urinary sphincter was implanted in 71 patients (median age 14.5; interquartile range 12.8-15.9), with a median follow-up time of 17.2 years (interquartile range 9.8-23.9 years). Thirty-nine patients underwent enterocystoplasty combined with artificial urinary sphincter placement and 32 underwent artificial urinary sphincter implantation alone, of whom 12 patients (16.9%) eventually required an enterocystoplasty because of unexpected bladder behavior changes, usually within 3 years of artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Adequate urinary continence was reported in 90.1% of patients, nine void their bladders spontaneously, and 62 need clean intermittent catheterization. Eighteen mechanical malfunctions occurred in 15 patients (21.1%), with an average artificial urinary sphincter working life of 15.1 ± 1.3 years. In five patients artificial urinary sphincter was removed due to infection or erosion. In 12 patients (30.8%), a continent catheterizable stoma was made (before or during the follow-up) because of problems with clean intermittent catheterization through the urethra. CONCLUSION: The very long-term results of this study demonstrate that artificial urinary sphincter is an effective treatment for urinary incontinence in neuropathic bladder patients. Long-term follow-up is important to identify potential unexpected changes in bladder behavior in these patients.


Assuntos
Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica , Incontinência Urinária , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica/etiologia , Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial/efeitos adversos
3.
J Pediatr Urol ; 19(3): 297-303, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36813690

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Simultaneous performance of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement and bladder augmentation (BA) in patients with neuropathic bladder is currently controversial. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to describe our very long-term results after a median follow-up of 17 years. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective single-center case-control study was performed in patients with neuropathic bladder treated in our institution between 1994 and 2020, in whom AUS placement and BA were performed simultaneously (SIM group) or sequentially at different times (SEQ group). Demographic variables, hospital length of stay (LOS), long-term outcomes and postoperative complications were compared between both groups. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (21 males, 18 females) were included, with a median age of 14.3 years. BA and AUS were performed simultaneously at the same intervention in 27 patients, and sequentially in different interventions in 12 cases, with a median of 18 months between both surgeries. No demographics differences were observed. SIM group had a shorter median LOS when compared to SEQ group, considering the two sequential procedures (10 vs. 15 days; p = 0.032). Median follow-up was 17.2 years (interquartile range 10.3-23.9). Four postoperative complications were reported, 3 patients in SIM group and 1 case in SEQ group, with no statistically significant differences between them (p = 0.758). Adequate urinary continence was achieved in more than 90% of patients in both groups. DISCUSSION: There are scarce recent studies comparing the combined performance of simultaneous or sequential AUS and BA in children with neuropathic bladder. The results of our study show a much lower postoperative infection rate than previously reported in the literature. It is a single-center analysis with a relatively small sample of patients although it is among the largest series published so far, and presents the longest long-term follow-up with more than 17 years of median follow-up time. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous BA and AUS placement appears safe and efficacious in children with neuropathic bladder, with shorter LOS and no differences in postoperative complications or long-term outcomes when compared to performing the two procedures sequentially at different times.


Assuntos
Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica , Incontinência Urinária , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial/efeitos adversos , Bexiga Urinaria Neurogênica/etiologia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
J Pediatr Urol ; 18(2): 185.e1-185.e6, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35034839

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Several surgical techniques for buried penis (BP) treatment have been described, although there is not a reference pattern for it. In our institution, we have traditionally performed penis fixation to Buck's fascia at 3 points. In 2014 we introduced a dorsal dartos flap technique, fixed at both sides of the penis base. OBJETIVE: To compare both techniques and their long-term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive patients with BP who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2018. They were divided according to surgical technique performed: group A (fascia fixation) and B (dorsal dartos flap). Demographic variables, surgical time and postoperative complications were analyzed. Long-term cosmetic outcomes were evaluated through a telephone survey to patients parents. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included (16 group A; 19 group B). Median age at intervention was 9.7 years in group A, with no statistical differences with group B (7.3 years; p = 0.071). No statistically significant differences were observed in mean surgical time or postoperative complications between both groups. Cosmetic outcomes (Table 2) were significantly better in group B, which presented higher percentages of satisfaction with the outcomes (95% vs. 64%; p = 0.02) and age at intervention (89% vs. 59%; p = 0.032), higher perception of the procedure as "minimally invasive" (100% vs. 71%; p = 0.013) and higher recommendation rate of the intervention (95% vs. 57%; p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Dorsal dartos flap is a reproducible, minimally invasive technique with minimal adverse effects and satisfactory long-term results. It has fewer postoperative complications and more satisfactory cosmetic results compared to fascia fixation.


Assuntos
Pênis , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Criança , Fáscia , Humanos , Masculino , Pênis/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos
5.
Front Public Health ; 10: 874758, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35570885

RESUMO

Introduction: COVID-19 impacted healthcare systems worldwide, and elective surgical activity was brought to a minimum. Although children were not primarily affected by the disease, pediatric urology was halted by clinical closedown and staff allocation. We aimed to document how these prioritizations affected waiting lists, and to investigate how European centers dealt with the challenge of these logistical and financial prioritizations. Materials and Methods: This was a 1-year prospective study, starting March 2020. Participants were surveyed at 3-month intervals about waiting lists for several common procedures as well as OR capacity and funding. Further, centers retrospectively reported on surgical and outpatient activity rates during 2019-2021. Waiting list tendencies were evaluated in relation to study baseline. Results: A marked decrease in surgical and outpatient activity was seen in the spring of 2020. Some included pediatric urology centers were able to increase their budget (15%) and staff working hours (20%) during part of the study period. Still, at the end of the study, the centers had increased the total number of patients on waiting lists with 11%, whereas the average days on waiting lists had accumulated with 73%, yielding a total of 6,102 accumulated waiting days in the study population. Centers with decreased resources had markedly negative effects on waiting lists. Conclusions: Correlations between COVID-19 derived burdening of healthcare systems and the availability of pediatric urology greatly depends on the prioritizations made at individual centers. Ongoing monitoring of these correlations is warranted to safely avoid unnecessary negative impact on the pediatric population.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Urologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Listas de Espera
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA