RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diabetes patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have more complications than nondiabetes patients, including increased long-term mortality. Use of bivalirudin versus heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) in diabetes patients undergoing PCI and its effect on long-term mortality were evaluated in few randomized trials, but with conflicting results. METHODS: We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials that compared heparin and GPI therapy with bivalirudin in diabetes patients undergoing PCI. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), death from any cause, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent revascularization, major and minor bleeding (at 30 days), as well as all-cause mortality at 1 year were included, and meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 5,137 patients with diabetes were included in four randomized trials. At 30 days, bivalirudin, compared with heparin and GPI, caused less major bleeding (odds ratio (OR), 0.68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.89; P = 0.005) and less minor bleeding (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.41-0.57; P < 0.00001) and similar rates of MACE (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.08; P = 0.21), MI (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.68-1.10; P = 0.25), and urgent revascularization (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.76-1.65; P = 0.57). Death from any cause at 30 day was numerically lower with bivalirudin use but not statistically significant (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.46-1.13; P = 0.15). Mortality at 1 year was significantly lower in diabetes patients treated with bivalirudin compared with heparin and GPI (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; P = 0.04). A secondary analysis suggests that the major bleeding benefit with bivalirudin may be driven by mandated use of GPI in heparin arm. CONCLUSION: Among patients with diabetes undergoing PCI, bivalirudin caused less major and minor bleeding compared with heparin and GPI, with similar rates of MACE, death, MI, and urgent revascularization at 30 days, but significantly lower mortality rates at 1 year.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Antitrombinas/uso terapêutico , Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Complicações do Diabetes , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/uso terapêutico , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Complexo Glicoproteico GPIIb-IIIa de Plaquetas/antagonistas & inibidores , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hirudinas , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Secondary bacterial infections post-COVID infection posed a major challenge to the healthcare settings during the COVID pandemic. We present the case of an 81-year-old patient who was initially admitted for COVID pneumonia in a tertiary care hospital and was managed with a course of dexamethasone and had a good outcome. However, post-discharge, the patient developed symptoms of productive cough, hemoptysis and shortness of breath. Evaluation of the patient revealed that the patient had developed a secondary bacterial infection with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), resulting in MRSA pneumonia and empyema. The patient was started on appropriate antibiotics and underwent thoracocentesis followed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and decortication. MRSA infection resulted in severe septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and multiorgan failure. Successful intensive care unit (ICU) management of the life-threatening complications resulted in the remarkable recovery of the patient.
Assuntos
Actinomicose/fisiopatologia , Anemia Hemolítica Autoimune/fisiopatologia , Febre/tratamento farmacológico , Febre/fisiopatologia , Osteomielite/fisiopatologia , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Trombocitopenia/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Feminino , Febre/diagnóstico , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the prognostic role of right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) in patients with heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Although RVSP is a readily available echocardiographic parameter, it is often underused. Its prognostic role in patients with heart failure is not well established compared with pulmonary artery pressure measured by right heart catheterization. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients with acute heart failure hospitalization admitted to the hospital from January 2005 to December 2018. The primary predictor was right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) obtained from bedside transthoracic echocardiography at admission. We divided RVSP into two groups, RVSP <40 mm Hg (reference group) and RVSP ≥40 mm Hg. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were all-cause readmission and cardiac readmission. We conducted propensity-score matching and applied cox-proportional hazard model to compute hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Out of 972 HF patients, 534 patients had RVSP <40 mm Hg and 438 patients had RVSP ≥40 mm Hg. Patients with RVSP ≥40 mm Hg compared with RVSP <40 mm Hg were associated with higher rates of death [HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.22-2.09, P-value = 0.001], all-cause readmissions [HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.09-1.73, P-value = 0.008] and cardiac readmissions [HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.07-1.85, P-value = 0.014]. CONCLUSION: Higher RVSP (≥40 mm Hg) in HF patients was associated with higher rates of death, all-cause readmissions, and cardiac readmissions. RVSP can be considered as a prognostic marker for mortality and readmission.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Readmissão do Paciente , Pressão Sanguínea , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Volume SistólicoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To review the pathophysiology of COVID-19 disease, potential aspirin targets on this pathogenesis and the potential role of aspirin in patients with COVID-19. DESIGN: Narrative review. SETTING: The online databases PubMed, OVID Medline and Cochrane Library were searched using relevant headlines from 1 January 2016 to 1 January 2021. International guidelines from relevant societies, journals and forums were also assessed for relevance. PARTICIPANTS: Not applicable. RESULTS: A review of the selected literature revealed that clinical deterioration in COVID-19 is attributed to the interplay between endothelial dysfunction, coagulopathy and dysregulated inflammation. Aspirin has anti-inflammatory effects, antiplatelet aggregation, anticoagulant properties as well as pleiotropic effects on endothelial function. During the COVID-19 pandemic, low-dose aspirin is used effectively in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement, prevention of pre-eclampsia and postdischarge treatment for multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Prehospital low-dose aspirin therapy may reduce the risk of intensive care unit admission and mechanical ventilation in hospitalised patients with COVID-19, whereas aspirin association with mortality is still debatable. CONCLUSION: The authors recommend a low-dose aspirin regimen for primary prevention of arterial thromboembolism in patients aged 40-70 years who are at high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, or an intermediate risk with a risk-enhancer and have a low risk of bleeding. Aspirin's protective roles in COVID-19 associated with acute lung injury, vascular thrombosis without previous cardiovascular disease and mortality need further randomised controlled trials to establish causal conclusions.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides , Aspirina , COVID-19 , Tromboembolia , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/fisiopatologia , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Inflamação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Tromboembolia/tratamento farmacológico , Tromboembolia/etiologia , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Most of the trials investigating the role of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) across various strata of risk categories have excluded patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis (BAS) due to its anatomical complexities. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis with meta-regression of studies comparing clinical, procedural, and after-procedural echocardiographic outcomes in BAS versus tricuspid aortic stenosis (TAS) patients who underwent TAVI. We searched the PubMed and Cochrane databases for relevant articles from the inception of the database to October 2019. Continuous and categorical variables were pooled using inverse variance and Mantel-Haenszel method, respectively, using the random-effect model. To rate the certainty of evidence for each outcome, we used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) approach. Nineteen articles were included in the final analysis. There was no difference in the risk of 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, 30-day cardiovascular mortality, major and/or life-threatening bleeding, major vascular complications, acute kidney injury, permanent pacemaker implantation, device success, annular rupture, after-procedural aortic valve area, and mean pressure gradient between the 2 groups. BAS patients who underwent TAVI had a higher risk of 30-day stroke, conversion to surgery, need for second valve implantation, and moderate to severe paravalvular leak. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis supports the feasibility of TAVI in surgically ineligible patients with BAS. However, the incidence of certain procedural complications such as stroke, conversion to surgery, second valve implantation, and paravalvular leak is higher among BAS patients compared with TAS patients, which must be discussed with the patient during the decision-making process.
Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Doença da Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide/cirurgia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/complicações , Doença da Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide/complicações , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Reoperação , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA, aspirin) is a well-known and frequently studied drug for primary and secondary prevention of disease due to its anti-inflammatory and coagulopathic effects. COVID-19 complications are attributed to the role of thrombo-inflammation. Studies regarding the use of low-dose ASA in COVID-19 are limited. For this reason, we propose that the use of low-dose ASA may have protective effects in COVID-19-related thromboembolism and lung injury. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of low-dose ASA compared with enoxaparin, an anticoagulant, for the prevention of thrombosis and mechanical ventilation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on COVID-19-confirmed hospitalized patients at the Mansoura University Quarantine Hospital, outpatients, and home-isolated patients from September to December 2020 in Mansoura governorate, Egypt. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of ASA compared with enoxaparin on thromboembolism, and mechanical ventilation needs. RESULTS: This study included 225 COVID-19 patients. Use of ASA-only (81-162 mg orally daily) was significantly associated with reduced thromboembolism (OR 0.163, p = 0.020), but both low-dose ASA and enoxaparin, and enoxaparin-only (0.5 mg/kg subcutaneously (SC) daily as prophylactic dose or 1 mg/kg SC every 12 hours as therapeutic dose) were more protective (odds ratio [OR] 0.010, OR 0.071, respectively, p < 0.001). Neither ASA-only nor enoxaparin-only were associated with a reduction in mechanical ventilation needs. Concomitant use of low-dose ASA and enoxaparin was associated with reduced mechanical ventilation (OR 0.032, 95% CI 0.004-0.226, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose ASA-only use may reduce the incidence of COVID-19-associated thromboembolism, but the reduction may be less than that of enoxaparin-only, and both ASA and enoxaparin. Concomitant use of ASA and enoxaparin demonstrates promising results with regard to the reduction of thrombotic events, and mechanical ventilation needs.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Trombose , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Aspirina , Enoxaparina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Respiração Artificial , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombose/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Vitiligo is an acquired skin disorder characterised by depigmentation of skin due to the selective destruction of melanocytes. The pathogenesis of vitiligo is still relatively unknown, but associations between vitiligo and other systemic autoimmune diseases have been made, such as with patients who have undergone haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in the treatment of haematological conditions. This article aims to review published literature that have reported the incidence of vitiligo following HSCT in order to understand their relationship, and any potential connections between vitiligo and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). On the 21st of May 2017, the databases Pubmed, EMBASE and SCOPUS were searched using the search terms Stem cell or transplant or GVHD AND vitiligo or leucoderma or leucoderma. There was a total of 38 cases (from 28 case report articles) along with 9 cohort studies that were included in the review. The studies reviewed showed that the incidence of vitiligo in patients who have received HSCT is higher than that of the normal population. Current studies are largely limited to single-case reports, which have certain inconsistencies with regard to patient/donor profiling, and future studies should look to address these issues.
Assuntos
Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Vitiligo , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/etiologia , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Incidência , Doadores de Tecidos , Vitiligo/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the viral pathogen responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a pandemic respiratory illness. While many patients experience mild to moderate symptoms, severely affected patients often progress to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Specific to COVID-19, abnormal coagulability appears to be a principal instigator in the progression of disease severity and mortality. In this report we summarize a case of COVID-19 in which extreme thrombophilia led to patient demise. CASE REPORT A 67-year-old man in New York presented to the hospital 14 days after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 at an outpatient site. His initial presenting symptoms included sore throat, headache, fever, and diarrhea. He was brought in by his wife after developing sudden onset confusion and dysarthria. The patient's clinical picture, which was unstable on presentation, further deteriorated to involve significant desaturations, generalized seizure activity, and cardiac arrest requiring resuscitation. Upon return to spontaneous circulation, the patient required intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor increases. Comprehensive workup uncovered coagulopathy with multiple thrombotic events involving the brain and lungs as well as radiographic evidence of severe lung disease. In the face of an unfavorable clinical picture, the family opted for comfort care measures. CONCLUSIONS In this case report on a 67-year-old-man with COVID-19, we present an account of extreme hypercoagulability that led to multiple thrombotic events eventually resulting in the man's demise. Abnormal coagulation 14 days from positive testing raises the question of whether outpatients with COVID-19 should be screened for hypercoagulability and treated with prophylactic anticoagulation/antiplatelet agents.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/genética , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , DNA Viral/análise , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Trombose/etiologia , Idoso , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombose/diagnósticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The role of systemic corticosteroid as a therapeutic agent for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia is controversial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of corticosteroids in non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19 pneumonia complicated by acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study, from 16th March, 2020 to 30th April, 2020; final follow-up on 10th May, 2020. 265 patients consecutively admitted to the non-ICU wards with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia were screened for inclusion. 205 patients who developed AHRF (SpO2/FiO2 ≤ 440 or PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300) were only included in the final study. Direct admission to the Intensive care unit (ICU), patients developing composite primary outcome within 24 hours of admission, and patients who never became hypoxic during their stay in the hospital were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on corticosteroid. The primary outcome was a composite of ICU transfer, intubation, or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU transfer, intubation, in-hospital mortality, discharge, length of stay, and daily trend of SpO2/FiO2 (SF) ratio from the index date. Cox-proportional hazard regression was implemented to analyze the time to event outcomes. RESULT: Among 205 patients, 60 (29.27%) were treated with corticosteroid. The mean age was ~57 years, and ~75% were men. Thirteen patients (22.41%) developed a primary composite outcome in the corticosteroid cohort vs. 54 (37.5%) patients in the non-corticosteroid cohort (P = 0.039). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the development of the composite primary outcome was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.07-0.33; P <0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio for ICU transfer was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.34; P < 0.001), intubation was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.70; P- 0.005), death was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.22 to 1.31; P- 0.172), composite of death or intubation was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.66; P- 0.002) and discharge was 3.65 (95% CI, 2.20 to 6.06; P<0.001). The corticosteroid cohort had increasing SpO2/FiO2 over time compared to the non-corticosteroid cohort who experience decreasing SpO2/FiO2 over time. CONCLUSION: Among non-ICU patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia complicated by AHRF, treatment with corticosteroid was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary composite outcome of ICU transfer, intubation, or in-hospital death, composite of intubation or death and individual components of the primary outcome.
Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New York , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a chronic disease process affecting multiple organ systems and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We report a case of a 43-year-old male with a history of unspecified cardiomyopathy who presented to the hospital with abdominal pain, distention, and nausea for 4 months. He was diagnosed with left ventricular noncompaction and gastroparesis. While symptoms of dyspnea, orthopnea, or increasing peripheral edema are the first that come to mind when thinking of a CHF exacerbation, we must broaden our scope to include such things as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and bloating which can also indicate worsening cardiac function. This case report highlights the significant yet often forgotten gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms that result from advanced biventricular heart failure, with emphasis on impaired gastric and intestinal motility.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on outcomes following cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with AF undergoing cardioversion. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched from January 1, 2001 through to October 30, 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran) with warfarin in AF patients undergoing cardioversion were selected. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke and systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. We used random-effects models. RESULTS: Four RCTs were included, involving a total of 3635 randomized participants who underwent a total of 4257 cardioversions. A total of 12 events of stroke and systemic embolism were found in the NOAC group and ten events in the warfarin group [odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-1.72]. Risk of major or CRNM bleeding was not different with NOACs, when compared with warfarin (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.87-2.28). CONCLUSIONS: Data from patients enrolled in RCTs, showed that NOACs are effective and safe for AF patients undergoing cardioversion.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Cardioversão Elétrica/métodos , Administração Oral , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Embolia/etiologia , Embolia/prevenção & controle , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Calcification within pulmonary lesions usually signifies a benign entity, but depending on the specific pattern of calcification it can also represent malignancy. The authors report a case of calcified small cell lung cancer in a patient with end-stage renal disease. The calcification was unrelated to renal failure and not the result of metastatic calcification, and the pattern of calcification and tissue pathology excluded other causes of calcification within this mediastinal mass.
Assuntos
Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Pequenas/complicações , Evolução Fatal , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
This study sought to investigate the relative safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and in those with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The safety of bivalirudin in PCI, particularly in patients with STEMI, continues to be debated. We searched the on-line databases for randomized controlled trials of bivalirudin versus heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Data on study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample characteristics, and clinical outcomes at 30 days were extracted. A total of 19,856 PCI patients included in 7 randomized trials and 5,820 patients with STEMI included in 2 randomized trials were separately analyzed. At 30 days, bivalirudin use in patients undergoing PCI resulted in similar rates of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis. In patients with STEMI, bivalirudin use resulted in decreased cardiac mortality (risk ratio [RR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50 to 0.97, p=0.03) compared with heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors but an increase in definite stent thrombosis at 30 days (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.24, p=0.02) driven by an increase in acute stent thrombosis (RR 5.48, 95% CI 2.30 to 13.07, p=0.0001). Bivalirudin use was associated with a decrease in Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74, p<0.0001) and TIMI minor (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.63, p<0.0001) bleeding rates in PCI patients as well as in a subgroup of patients with STEMI. In conclusion, in PCI patients anticoagulation with bivalirudin results in similar ischemic adverse events and a reduction in TIMI major and minor bleeding at 30 days compared with heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. In patients with STEMI, bivalirudin use is associated with a reduction in TIMI major and minor bleeding and fewer deaths from cardiac causes but an increase in acute and 30-day definite stent thrombosis.