RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To cope with the COVID-19 outbreak in Germany, the government imposed a lockdown, which led to restrictions and lifestyle changes for the population. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the lockdown on activities causing trauma and the consultation in emergency rooms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive trauma patients consulting the Emergency Department of the Marienhospital Stuttgart (MHS), Germany, during the 6 weeks preceding the lockdown, during and after the lockdown were included. The time and type of consultation, treatment received, Manchester triage score, type of trauma, the anatomical region of the injury as well as demographic data were reported and compared. RESULTS: The study included 551 cases during lockdown, 943 cases before and 783 cases after the lockdown. We observed a reduced caseload during the lockdown of 41.6% compared to before and of 29.7% compared to after (pâ¯< 0.001). Patients were on average older in the observation group than in both control groups (before : 51.5 years, lockdown: 56.1 years, after: 51.6 years) (pâ¯< 0.001). Injuries to the head and neck were constant (25.0%, 25.4%, 25.5%). We noticed lower limb injuries decreasing (26.1%, 22.3%, 22.7%) and upper limb injuries increasing (25.5%, 31.8%, 30.1%). A decrease in sports injuries (11.1%, 5.1%, 9.1%) and work accidents (16.1%, 10.7%, 12.8%) resulted in more domestic accidents (30.4%, 52.5%, 31.8%). Self-referral decreased (67.7%, 53.2%, 60.3%) while referral via paramedics increased (28.3%, 38.7%, 35.6). Blunt trauma was the most common cause of injury (55.6%, 61.0%, 55.3%). Indications for surgery were higher (16.8%, 21.6%, 14.0%). CONCLUSION: The lockdown and restrictions in personal life and daily routine had an impact on the frequency, etiology and management of trauma patients in Stuttgart.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Quarentena , Humanos , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Hospitais de Ensino , Estações do Ano , Procedimentos OrtopédicosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Thermal inhalation injury is a common, life-threatening problem in burned patients. Whether or not this single event of damage to the oral integrity causes long term health problems is yet to be examined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All consecutive burn patients between 2014 and 2017 of Marienhospital Stuttgart (MHS), Germany, with at least 10% of burned skin surface were included and compared. The Periodontal Screening Index as well as Vitamin D levels were examined. Vitamin D has been suspected to contribute to the genesis of periodontitis. Risk factors and subjective oral life quality were prompted. RESULTS: We included a total of 32 patients, 15 of which had an inhalation injury in their medical history. Risk factors were examined via Renatus' questionnaire. While risk factors were equally distributed in both groups we saw a remarkable difference in periodontal integrity, with the Periodontal Screening Index (PSI) per sextant differing drastically (with inhalation injury: 2.40, without inhalation injury: 1.10, p < 0.001). Patients with an inhalation injury had a mean of 5.2 out of 6 possible sextants with a pathologic PSI (with the median being 6/6), while patients without an inhalation injury had a mean of 1.83 out of 6 (median: 1/6), p < 0.001. The oral health impact profile showed a difference as well, albeit without statistical significance (with inhalation injury: median = 11, without: median = 3.5, p = 0.414). A correlation between Serum Vitamin D levels and periodontal integrity could not be seen in this group. CONCLUSION: Inhalation injury is a possible cause for periodontitis and hence impacts the quality of life of burned patients.