Potential benefit of GnRH-agonist treatment before uterine artery embolization for large fibroids: MRI prediction of fibroid volume reduction.

BACKGROUND: Signal intensity (SI) of predominant fibroid (F1) on T2-weighted (T2W) images is useful for predicting the volume reduction response after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonist treatment. Few studies have been published regarding when and how to use GnRH agonist before UAE. PURPOSE: To investigate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prediction of volume reduction rate (VRR) of large fibroids after GnRH-agonist treatment before uterine artery embolization (UAE) as well as the efficacy of UAE based on MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 30 patients with a large fibroid and MRI results both before and after GnRH-agonist treatment were retrospectively analyzed. Indications for GnRH-agonist treatment are fibroids with a maximum diameter ≥10 cm or pedunculated submucosal fibroids ≥8 cm. GnRH agonist (3.75 mg leuprolide acetate) was administered subcutaneously once per month 2-6 times. SI of F1 on T2W imaging was measured: the SI was referenced to the SI of the rectus abdominis muscle (F/R). RESULTS: Mean maximum fibroid diameter was 11.1 ± 1.9 cm (range = 8.0-15.5 cm). Mean number of GnRH-agonist injections before UAE was 2.8 (range = 2-6). For predicting VRR ≥50% and <30%, the optimal cut-off values of F/R were 2.58 (sensitivity 80%, specificity 80%) and 1.69 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 70%), respectively. Of the 30 patients, fibroid infarction was complete in 29 (96.7%). CONCLUSION: SI of F1 on T2W imaging is useful for predicting the volume reduction response after GnRH-agonist treatment. After GnRH-agonist treatment for large fibroids, UAE is effective to achieve complete infarction of fibroids.

Comparison of Retrievability and Indwelling Complications of Celect and Denali Infrarenal Vena Cava Filters: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the Celect and Denali filters in terms of complex filter retrieval and indwelling complications after a 2-month indwelling time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, randomized trial, 153 subjects were assessed for eligibility between May 2016 and July 2018. A total of 136 participants were randomly assigned to receive either Celect (n = 68) or Denali (n = 68) filter placement in the infrarenal inferior vena cava. Tilt angles at placement and retrieval and rates of overall filter retrieval, indwelling complication, and complex retrieval were compared. RESULTS: Of 136 participants (mean age, 62 ± 12.8 years, 55 male), 24 (17.6%) were lost to follow-up. The mean indwelling time of filter was 60.4 ± 7 days and there was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Filter retrieval was successful in all participants (112/112, 100%). Significantly higher rates of filter tilt > 15° (n = 8) and strut penetration (n = 14) were found with the Celect filter than with the Denali filter (1 significant tilt and 1 penetration) (P = 0.033 and 0.001, respectively). No filter fractures were observed and there was no significant difference in tip embedment, filter fracture, filter migration, or mean fluoroscopy times. There were 3 cases of complex retrieval (1 for Denali vs. 2 for Celect, P = 0.500), for which the loop-snare technique was used. CONCLUSION: Denali filters demonstrated significantly lower rates of tilt angle > 15° and strut penetration. However, there was no significant difference in the complex filter retrieval rate between the Celect and Denali filters.