Commonalities between the Berger Rhythm and spectra differences driven by cross-modal attention and imagination.

When people close their eyes, the power of alpha-band oscillatory brain activity increases. We explored the possibility that this could be related to a suppression of visual processing, rather than being a default dynamic of the visual brain. We recorded brain activity while people meditated with their eyes open or closed, and when people attended to or imagined having auditory or visual experiences. We could decode the attended or imagined modality of experiences based on the spectra of brain activity that prevailed while meditating with open or closed eyes. We also found anecdotal evidence suggesting the strength of imagined sensory experiences may be predicted by the dynamics of neural networks that are responsive to inputs. Overall, our data suggest spectra changes when people close their eyes might relate to a targeted suppression of visual processing, as opposed to being a default state of idle visual brains.

Predicting the subjective intensity of imagined experiences from electrophysiological measures of oscillatory brain activity.

Most people can conjure images and sounds that they experience in their minds. There are, however, marked individual differences. Some people report that they cannot generate imagined sensory experiences at all (aphantasics) and others report that they have unusually intense imagined experiences (hyper-phantasics). These individual differences have been linked to activity in sensory brain regions, driven by feedback. We would therefore expect imagined experiences to be associated with specific frequencies of oscillatory brain activity, as these can be a hallmark of neural interactions within and across regions of the brain. Replicating a number of other studies, relative to a Resting-State we find that the act of engaging in auditory or in visual imagery is linked to reductions in the power of oscillatory brain activity across a broad range of frequencies, with prominent peaks in the alpha band (8-12 Hz). This oscillatory activity, however, did not predict individual differences in the subjective intensity of imagined experiences. For audio imagery, these were rather predicted by reductions within the theta (6-9 Hz) and gamma (33-38 Hz) bands, and by increases in beta (15-17 Hz) band activity. For visual imagery these were predicted by reductions in lower (14-16 Hz) and upper (29-32 Hz) beta band activity, and by an increase in mid-beta band (24-26 Hz) activity. Our data suggest that there is sufficient ground truth in the subjective reports people use to describe the intensity of their imagined sensory experiences to allow these to be linked to the power of distinct rhythms of brain activity. In future, we hope to combine this approach with better measures of the subjective intensity of imagined sensory experiences to provide a clearer picture of individual differences in the subjective intensity of imagined experiences, and of why these eventuate.