RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Mental health concerns among adolescents are increasingly prevalent, yet underrecognized. Adolescents with psychological distress often present to the emergency department (ED) with somatic symptoms. Due to inadequate time for rapport building and lack of familiarity of ED clinicians with psychosocial evaluation, these concerns often get missed. We describe the development and implementation of the Youth Well Being (YWB) questionnaire, a self-administered psychosocial screening tool that aims to overcome the communication barriers to psychosocial evaluation. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team used a Delphi-like approach to develop the questionnaire, using the home, education, activities/peers, drugs/alcohol, suicidality, emotions/behavior, discharge resources (HEADS-ED) questionnaire as the main reference. Modifications were made based on panel members' clinical experience and adapted to suit local sociocultural context. The YWB questionnaire is administered to adolescents aged 10 to 19 years presenting to the KK Women's and Children's Hospital ED with possible psychosomatic symptoms and behavioral or mental health issues. Positive findings prompt further targeted face-to-face interviews by the clinicians to facilitate appropriate psychosocial referral. RESULTS: The 9 domains in the YWB questionnaire explore potential psychosocial difficulties that affect the adolescent's well-being and aim to uncover potential issues that could account for the adolescent's symptoms. We discuss the rationale behind the questions and response options in the YWB questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: The YWB questionnaire is the first initiative in Singapore to enable efficient psychosocial screening of at-risk adolescents in the ED. This communication tool can potentially be used in other health care settings to enable early recognition and intervention for adolescents distressed by psychosocial problems.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: P16 and cyclin-D1 are cell cycle proteins commonly dysregulated in head and neck carcinoma. We assessed their expression, clinicopathological variables, and overall survival (OS) in oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS: Clinical characteristics and p16 and cyclin-D1 expression were evaluated in 101 patients with oropharyngeal SCC and 75 patients with hypopharyngeal SCC. Associations with OS were assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Compared to oropharyngeal SCC, patients with hypopharyngeal SCC were older, men, ever-smokers with higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), lower p16 expression, and poorer median OS (24.8 vs 62.3 months; p < .01). In oropharyngeal SCC, CCI (p < .001), cyclin-D1 (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.55; p = .007), current smoking (HR = 5.72; p = .004), and former smoking (HR = 4.12; p = .035) were independently associated with OS. In hypopharyngeal SCC, only nodal and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status were associated with OS. CONCLUSION: In oropharyngeal SCC, cyclin-D1 expression is correlated with survival, whereas smoking status and CCI may allow further stratification of outcome.