Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 100(6): 617-625, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27509351

RESUMO

Increasingly, tumors are defined on a molecular basis rather than only on histology, and targeted agents, which address these molecular subtypes, are being approved. This profusion of molecular subtypes creates "rare" diseases as subsets of common cancers, leading to difficulties in enrolling sufficiently large cohorts for confirmatory trials. However, if the molecular subtype is shared across various histologies, these may be pooled into a basket trial. To date, basket trials have been primarily for exploratory early development. In this perspective, we consider qualitative designs for confirmatory basket trials. These confirmatory basket designs will provide patients in niche indications with enhanced access to novel therapies, facilitate development and full approval for niche indications, allow accelerated approval for indications within a basket based on a surrogate endpoint, reduce development cost by combining trials, and enhance the ability of regulatory authorities to evaluate risk and benefit in niche indications.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Aprovação de Drogas , Neoplasias/patologia , Projetos de Pesquisa , Humanos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Neoplasias/terapia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 100(6): 713-729, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27643536

RESUMO

Adaptive, seamless, multisponsor, multitherapy clinical trial designs executed as large scale platforms, could create superior evidence more efficiently than single-sponsor, single-drug trials. These trial PIPELINEs also could diminish barriers to trial participation, increase the representation of real-world populations, and create systematic evidence development for learning throughout a therapeutic life cycle, to continually refine its use. Comparable evidence could arise from multiarm design, shared comparator arms, and standardized endpoints-aiding sponsors in demonstrating the distinct value of their innovative medicines; facilitating providers and patients in selecting the most appropriate treatments; assisting regulators in efficacy and safety determinations; helping payers make coverage and reimbursement decisions; and spurring scientists with translational insights. Reduced trial times and costs could enable more indications, reduced development cycle times, and improved system financial sustainability. Challenges to overcome range from statistical to operational to collaborative governance and data exchange.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Projetos de Pesquisa , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/economia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/organização & administração , Comportamento Cooperativo , Determinação de Ponto Final , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/organização & administração
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA