The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in suspected biliary obstruction and its impact on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography burden in real clinical practice: a consecutive analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Performing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been described to be useful in cases of suspected biliary obstruction where EUS can triage patients for ERCP. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of EUS and its impact on ERCP burden in real clinical practice. We also evaluated the safety and efficacy of EUS+ERCP in a single endoscopic session. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and eighteen consecutive patients with suspected but unexplained biliary obstruction referred for EUS before possible ERCP were evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy of EUS and its value in predicting the need for ERCP were determined. EUS established whether pancreaticobiliary disorder (PBD) was present and whether therapeutic ERCP was required. These decisions were matched with ERCP findings, histology, clinical course, and follow-up. Where ERCP was indicated, it was performed in the same endoscopic session. RESULTS: EUS was performed in 412/418 patients (feasibility 98.5%), and ERCP was considered necessary in 64% (ERCP avoided in 36%). The single-session EUS and ERCP was safe and effective (264 patients). The diagnostic accuracy of EUS was as follows: choledocholithiasis 99%, malignant strictures 90%, and benign strictures 92%. EUS showed pathology in 42% of patients who had a nondilated biliary system at initial investigations. When EUS indicated a normal common bile duct (n=119), this had a 100% positive predictive value for non-necessity for ERCP. The median overall follow-up period was 12 months (range 6-34 months). CONCLUSION: EUS demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in this mixed group of PBD. This accurately guided ERCP need and avoided unnecessary ERCP in 36%. EUS and ERCP in the same endoscopic session for the evaluation and management of PBD is technically feasible, with safety and efficacy profiles equivalent to that of each procedure performed independently in different sessions.

Safety of infliximab in 10 years of clinical practice.

UNLABELLED: Assessment of the long-term safety of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapies is vital for the safe treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, a disease affecting a young cohort of patients. AIMS: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the safety and long-term outcome of infliximab use in clinical practice in our institution on an intention to treat basis over the 10-year period from December 1998 to 31 December 2008. METHODS: All cases receiving infliximab for ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease over a 10-year period were identified from hospital pharmacy records. The study was based on a single centre cohort, with an unselected patient group. RESULTS: A total of 271 patients were identified as receiving infliximab for either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis over the 10-year study period. In total, 2169 infusions were given to the patient cohort. Fifty adverse events led to discontinuation of infliximab therapy in 47 cases. Two patients stopped due to neurological complications. There were six malignancies diagnosed within the cohort during the study period. Four of these were diagnosed while the individual was receiving Infliximab and two occurred at an interval of 21-52 months post their final infliximab infusion. A total of five deaths (1.5%) were observed during the study period. CONCLUSION: Infliximab therapy seems to be safe and efficacious in the long term. Although the development of malignancy remains a concern, we have not seen an increased risk of serious infection within our cohort.