Intravenous topiramate for seizure emergencies - First in human case report.

Topiramate (TPM) is widely used in focal and generalized epilepsies. It is commercially available as tablets and sprinkles capsules for oral treatment. Previous studies comparing intravenous (IV) to oral TPM in healthy adults showed more rapid pharmacodynamic effects in cases of IV administration. Despite promising findings, no clinical application in humans followed. We present a case of a pregnant woman with idiopathic generalized epilepsy who experienced a generalized tonic-clonic seizure in the third trimenon due to low TPM levels attributed to pregnancy followed by repeated prolonged absences. We applied a new meglumine-based solution (1%) of TPM (10 mg/ml) in two IV infusions of 200 mg each under EEG monitoring over a total duration of 1 hour. The infusion was well tolerated and led to a rapid increase in plasma TPM levels. A clinical as well as electroencephalographic improvement was documented within the first hours. To the best available knowledge, this is the first reported case where IV TPM was used therapeutically for seizure treatment in humans. It is also the first time that the new meglumine-based solution was used in a human with epilepsy. The advantages of IV route delivery and the solution's quick preparation, high tolerability, and low toxicity make it ideal for use in many clinical settings and high-care patients. IV TPM seems to be a reasonable adjunctive option for adults with seizures, previously stabilized on oral TPM, who need rapid plasma concentration boosting. Although our experience was successful in using injectable TPM in seizure emergencies, randomized controlled clinical trials are required to make recommendations for the use of IV TPM on patients with epilepsy. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022 in Salzburg, Austria.

COVID-19 vaccination-related headache showed two different clusters in the long-term course: a prospective multicenter follow-up study (COVA-Head Study).

BACKGROUND: Although acute headache following COVID-19 vaccination is widely acknowledged, the long-term progression of these headaches remains poorly understood. Our objective was to identify various phenotypes of prolonged or worsened headaches associated with COVID-19 vaccination and document any changes in these phenotypes over an extended period. Additionally, we aimed to document the diverse headache presentations among patients with pre-existing primary headaches. METHODS: A multinational, prospective observational study was conducted to investigate prolonged or worsened headaches associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Questionnaires assessing COVID-19 vaccination-related headaches at three time points (initial visit, 3rd month follow-up, and 6th month follow-up) were developed for the study. Headache specialists/clinicians evaluated patients using these questionnaires in a prospective manner. Repeated K-means cluster analysis was performed to identify patient profiles with prolonged or worsened headaches related to COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: Among the 174 patients included in the study, there was a female-to-male ratio of 128 (73.6%) to 46 (26.4%). The mean age of the patient group was 45.2 ± 13.3 years, and 107 patients (61.5%) had a pre-existing history of primary headaches. Through the analysis, two major clusters were identified based on headache characteristics at each visit. During the first visit (n = 174), Cluster 1 primarily comprised patients with a history of primary headaches, frontal localization of pain, throbbing pain type, more severe headaches accompanied by symptoms such as nausea, phonophobia, photophobia, and osmophobia, and worsened by physical activity. In contrast, Cluster 2 consisted of patients with longer headache durations (over one month) and a stabbing/pressing quality of pain. Patients in Cluster 1 had a higher prevalence of migraine as the pre-existing primary headache disorder compared to Cluster 2 (90.48% vs. 68.18%, respectively; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The identification of two distinct phenotypes of prolonged or worsened headaches related to COVID-19 vaccination can provide valuable clinical insights. Having an awareness of the potential worsening of headaches following COVID-19 vaccination, particularly in patients with a primary headache disorder such as migraine, can help clinicians and headache experts anticipate and adjust their treatment strategies accordingly. This knowledge can aid in preplanning treatment modifications and optimize patient care.

Headache onset after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are used to reduce the risk of developing Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Despite the significant benefits in terms of reduced risk of hospitalization and death, different adverse events may present after vaccination: among them, headache is one of the most common, but nowadays there is no summary presentation of its incidence and no description of its main features. METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE covering the period between January 1st 2020 and August 6th, 2021, looking for record in English and with an abstract and using three main search terms (with specific variations): COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2; Vaccination; headache/adverse events. We selected manuscript including information on subjects developing headache after injection, and such information had to be derived from a structured form (i.e. no free reporting). Pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Analyses were carried out by vaccine vs. placebo, by first vs. second dose, and by mRNA-based vs. "traditional" vaccines; finally, we addressed the impact of age and gender on post-vaccine headache onset. RESULTS: Out of 9338 records, 84 papers were included in the review, accounting for 1.57 million participants, 94% of whom received BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1. Headache was generally the third most common AE: it was detected in 22% (95% CI 18-27%) of subjects after the first dose of vaccine and in 29% (95% CI 23-35%) after the second, with an extreme heterogeneity. Those receiving placebo reported headache in 10-12% of cases. No differences were detected across different vaccines or by mRNA-based vs. "traditional" ones. None of the studies reported information on headache features. A lower prevalence of headache after the first injection of BNT162b2 among older participants was shown. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that vaccines are associated to a two-fold risk of developing headache within 7 days from injection, and the lack of difference between vaccine types enable to hypothesize that headache is secondary to systemic immunological reaction than to a vaccine-type specific reaction. Some descriptions report onset within the first 24 h and that in around one-third of the cases, headache has migraine-like features with pulsating quality, phono and photophobia; in 40-60% of the cases aggravation with activity is observed. The majority of patients used some medication to treat headache, the one perceived as the most effective being acetylsalicylic acid.

A Case of Class I 17p13.3 Microduplication Syndrome with Unilateral Hearing Loss.

17p13 is a chromosomal region characterized by genomic instability due to high gene density leading to multiple deletion and duplication events. 17p13.3 microduplication syndrome is a rare condition, reported only in 40 cases worldwide, which is found in the Miller-Dieker chromosomal region, presenting a wide range of phenotypic manifestations. Usually, the duplicated area is de novo and varies in size from 1.8 to 4.0 Mbp. Critical genes for this region are PAFAH1B1 (#601545), YWHAE (#605066), and CRK (#164762). 17p13.3 microduplication syndrome can be categorized into two classes (Class I and Class II) based on the genes that are present in the duplicated area, which lead to different phenotypes. In this report, we present a new case of Class I 17p13.3 microduplication syndrome that presents with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Oligonucleotide and SNP array comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) analysis revealed a duplication of approximately 121 Kbp on chromosome 17p13.3, which includes YWHAE and CRK genes. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis confirmed the duplication. Our patient has common clinical symptoms of Class I 17p13.3 microduplication syndrome, and in addition, she has unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Interestingly, WES analysis did not detect any mutations in genes that are associated with hearing loss. The above findings lead us to propose that hearing loss is a manifestation of 17p13.3 duplication syndrome.

The genetic etiology in cerebral palsy mimics: The results from a Greek tertiary care center.

OBJECTIVE: Non-progressive genetic disorders may present with motor dysfunction resembling cerebral palsy (CP). Such patients are often characterized as CP mimics. The purpose of this work was to delineate the clinical manifestations and molecular findings of CP mimic patients, with the ultimate goal to offer specific disease-modifying therapy and genetic counseling. METHODS: Retrospective study of 47 patients diagnosed with CP and no acquired etiology. Chart review of clinical, neuroradiological, biochemical and molecular data was performed. RESULTS: 31,91% of patients manifested with features resembling dyskinetic CP, 19,14% spastic CP, 10,63% ataxic CP and 38,30% mixed CP. In 23 patients molecular diagnosis was reached and included 5 hereditary spastic paraplegia genes (SPG) in spastic CP mimics; HPRT1, TH, QDPR, DDC in dystonic CP mimics; ADCY5 and NIKX2-1 in choreic CP mimics; CANA1A in ataxic CP mimics; and SPG, PDHA1, NIKX2-1, AT, SLC2A1 and SPR in mixed CP mimics. In 14 patients, the etiological diagnosis led to specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: CP mimics show a number of features that differ from classic CP and can be used as diagnostic clues, including presence of mixed motor features, minor dysmorphic features, oculogyric movements, multiple features of autonomic dysfunction, and acquired microcephaly. A more stringent use of the concept of CP focused on acquired lesions during the perinatal and infancy periods, and excluding disorders that could be of genetic origin, could contribute to a purer use of the term. Identification of a specific genetic cause for CP mimics may in certain cases lead to etiologic treatment.