An angiotensin II receptor blocker-calcium channel blocker combination prevents cardiovascular events in elderly high-risk hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease better than high-dose angiotensin II receptor blockade alone.

The OSCAR study was a multicenter, prospective randomized open-label blinded end-point study of 1164 Japanese elderly hypertensive patients comparing the efficacy of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) uptitration to an ARB plus calcium channel blocker (CCB) combination. In this prospective study, we performed prespecified subgroup analysis according to baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) defined as an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Blood pressure was lower in the combined therapy than in the high-dose ARB cohort in both groups with and without CKD. In patients with CKD, significantly more primary events (a composite of cardiovascular events and noncardiovascular death) occurred in the high-dose ARB group than in the combination group (30 vs. 16, respectively, hazard ratio 2.25). Significantly more cerebrovascular and more heart failure events occurred in the high-dose ARB group than in the combination group. In patients without CKD, however, the incidence of primary events was similar between the two treatments. The treatment-by-subgroup interaction was significant. Allocation to the high-dose ARB was a significant independent prognostic factor for primary events in patients with CKD. Thus, the ARB plus CCB combination conferred greater benefit in prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with CKD compared with high-dose ARB alone. Our findings provide new insight into the antihypertensive strategy for elderly hypertensive patients with CKD.

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with pravastatin in Japan (MEGA Study): a prospective randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based treatment for hypercholesterolaemia in Japan has been hindered by the lack of direct evidence in this population. Our aim was to assess whether evidence for treatment with statins derived from western populations can be extrapolated to the Japanese population. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, open-labelled, blinded study, patients with hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol 5.69-6.98 mmol/L) and no history of coronary heart disease or stroke were randomly assigned diet or diet plus 10-20 mg pravastatin daily. The primary endpoint was the first occurrence of coronary heart disease. Statistical analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00211705. FINDINGS: 3966 patients were randomly assigned to the diet group and 3866 to the diet plus pravastatin group. Mean follow-up was 5.3 years. At the end of study, 471 and 522 patients had withdrawn, died, or been lost to follow-up in the diet and diet plus pravastatin groups, respectively. Mean total cholesterol was reduced by 2.1% (from 6.27 mmol/L to 6.13 mmol/L) and 11.5% (from 6.27 mmol/L to 5.55 mmol/L) and mean LDL cholesterol by 3.2% (from 4.05 mmol/L to 3.90 mmol/L) and 18.0% (from 4.05 mmol/L to 3.31 mmol/L) in the diet and the diet plus pravastatin groups, respectively. Coronary heart disease was significantly lower in the diet plus pravastatin group than in the diet alone group (66 events vs 101 events; HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.91; p=0.01). There was no difference in the incidence of malignant neoplasms or other serious adverse events between the two groups. INTERPRETATION: Treatment with a low dose of pravastatin reduces the risk of coronary heart disease in Japan by much the same amount as higher doses have shown in Europe and the USA.

Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil in achieving 24-hour blood pressure reductions and ambulatory blood pressure goals.

BACKGROUND: For patients with hypertension, effective 24-hour blood pressure (BP) control is vital to ensure protection against the early morning surge in BP and the associated increased risk of cardiovascular events. The aim of this analysis was to assess the 24-hour antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil (20mg once daily) compared with candesartan cilexetil (8mg once daily), with particular emphasis on BP control during the early morning period. METHODS: This is an additional analysis of a previously reported randomised, double-blind study in which 635 patients with mainly mild to moderate hypertension were randomised to 8 weeks of treatment with either olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg/day or candesartan cilexetil 8 mg/day. Changes from baseline during the last 4 and 2 hours of ambulatory BP measurement (ABPM) after 1, 2 and 8 weeks of treatment were compared between the two groups. In addition, the proportions of patients who achieved various ABPM goals, including those suggested by the European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) [<125/80mm Hg] and the Japanese Society of Hypertension (JSH) [<135/80mm Hg], over 24 hours, during the daytime and at the last 4 and 2 hours of ABPM measurement were also compared. RESULTS: After 8 weeks, significantly greater proportions of patients treated with olmesartan medoxomil 20mg achieved 24-hour and daytime ABPM goals recommended by the guidelines of the ESH/ESC (25.6% and 18.3%, respectively) and JSH (37.5% and 26.6%, respectively) compared with candesartan cilexetil 8mg (24-hour ESH/ESC goal = 14.9%, p < 0.001; 24-hour JSH goal = 26.6%, p = 0.003; daytime ESH/ESC goal = 9.6%, p = 0.002; daytime JSH goal = 16.4%, p = 0.002). During the last 4 hours of 24-hour ABPM, the proportions of patients who achieved the ESH/ESC and JSH ABPM goals were significantly greater with olmesartan medoxomil (33.3% and 39.1%, respectively) than with candesartan cilexetil (22.9%, p < 0.001 and 31.6%, p = 0.047, respectively). Similarly, during the last 2 hours of 24-hour ABPM, the proportions of patients who achieved these BP goals were either significantly greater (JSH) or approached statistical significance (ESH/ESC) with olmesartan medoxomil (26.9% and 19.9%, respectively) compared with candesartan cilexetil (19.6%, p = 0.028 and 14.3%, p = 0.061, respectively). CONCLUSION: Compared with candesartan cilexetil 8mg, greater proportions of olmesartan medoxomil-treated patients (20mg) achieved ESH/ESC and JSH ABPM goals over 24 hours. The superior BP control of olmesartan medoxomil was also reflected in the larger proportions of olmesartan medoxomil-treated patients who achieved the ESH/ESC and JSH ABPM goals during the early morning surge period. This not only demonstrates that olmesartan medoxomil 20mg provides superior 24-hour BP reduction, but also suggests that olmesartan medoxomil may provide greater protection against the increased risk of cardiovascular events associated with the early morning BP surge period.

Effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist on electrical and structural remodeling in atrial fibrillation.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antagonist on chronic structural remodeling in atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: We previously reported that an AT1R antagonist, candesartan, prevents acute electrical remodeling in a rapid pacing model. However, the effect of candesartan on chronic structural remodeling in AF is unclear. METHODS: Sustained AF was induced in 20 dogs (10 in a control group and 10 in a candesartan group) by rapid pacing of the right atrium (RA) at 400 beats/min for five weeks. Candesartan was administered orally (10 mg/kg/day) for one week before rapid pacing and was continued for five weeks. The AF duration, atrial effective refractory period (AERP) at four sites in the RA, and intra-atrial conduction time (CT) from the RA appendage to the other three sites were measured every week. RESULTS: The mean AF duration in the control group after five weeks was significantly longer than that with candesartan (1,333 +/- 725 vs. 411 +/- 301 s, p < 0.01). The degree of AERP shortening after five weeks was not significantly different between the two groups. The CT from the RA appendage to the low RA after five weeks with candesartan was significantly shorter than that in the control (43 +/- 14 vs. 68 +/- 10 ms, p < 0.05). The candesartan group had a significantly lower percentage of interstitial fibrosis than the control group (7 +/- 2% vs. 16 +/- 1% at the RA appendage, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Candesartan can prevent the promotion of AF by suppressing the development of structural remodeling.

Chymase inhibition suppresses high-cholesterol diet-induced lipid accumulation in the hamster aorta.

OBJECTIVE: The role of chymase (a mast cell-derived angiotensin II-forming serine proteinase) in aortic lipid deposition was investigated using an orally active, non-peptide chymase inhibitor, SUN-C8257. METHODS: Male golden Syrian hamsters, 8 weeks old, were fed with a standard rodent meal supplemented with or without 0.5% cholesterol and 10% coconut oil for 12 weeks. The hamsters fed high cholesterol diet were further separated into two groups treated with or without SUN-C8257 for 12 weeks. The aortic lipid deposition was visualized by Oil red O staining and planimetrically measured. Immunohistochemical staining for angiotensin II (Ang II) of the aortic root region was performed. Aortic Ang II-forming activity was measured using Ang I as a substrate. Plasma total-, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglyceride were quantified by enzymatic methods. Plasma Ang I and Ang II were measured by radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of high cholesterol diet, aortic chymase activity in the untreated group increased significantly and showed a positive correlation with plasma total- and LDL-cholesterol. This group of hamsters developed marked lipid deposits in the aortic intima. However, treatment with SUN-C8257 significantly suppressed aortic lipid deposition without changing body weight, blood pressure, plasma LDL-cholesterol and Ang II levels. The level of the adventitial Ang II-immunoreactivity was markedly inhibited in the group treated with SUN-C8257. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that arterial chymase may participate in the acceleration of lipid deposition in arterial walls exposed to high plasma cholesterol and that inhibition of arterial chymase may retard the progression of atherosclerosis.

Differential effectiveness of ARB plus CCB therapy and high-dose ARB therapy in high-risk elderly hypertensive patients: subanalysis of the OSCAR study.

The OSCAR study was a multicenter prospective randomized study that examined the relative benefit of combined ARB (olmesartan 20 mg per day) plus calcium channel blocker (CCB) therapy vs. high-dose ARB monotherapy (olmesartan 40 mg per day) for prevention of cardiovascular events in elderly Japanese hypertensive patients. The present subanalysis of patients enrolled in the OSCAR study (n = 1078) was performed to assess whether baseline eGFR coupled with cardiovascular disease (CVD) could predict the relative benefit of these two treatments. Patients with baseline CVD (n = 769) and patients without baseline CVD (n = 309) were divided into two groups based on baseline eGFR; (i) patients with eGFR of < 60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-)(2) and (ii) those with eGFR of ⩾ 60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2). There was a significant treatment-subgroup interaction among these four subgroups in relation to the incidence of primary outcome events(P = 0.007 for interaction). In patients with CVD and with eGFR of <60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2), ARB plus CCB therapy was associated with a lower incidence of primary events than high-dose ARB therapy and the difference of the relative risk was statistically significant (hazard ratio: 3.525, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.676-7.412, P < 0.001). The greater benefit of ARB plus CCB therapy vs. high-dose ARB therapy in this subgroup was associated with less visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP and diastolic BP. In conclusion, baseline eGFR coupled with baseline CVD seems to be a predictor of the relative efficacy of ARB plus CCB therapy vs. high-dose ARB therapy in the elderly hypertensive patients. ARB plus CCB therapy appears to be superior to high-dose ARB therapy for preventing cardiovascular events in the patients with CVD and with eGFR of <60 ml min(-1) 1.73 m(-2).

Human chymase expression in a mice induces mild hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy.

A number of in vitro studies have suggested potential pathophysiological roles of human (h-) chymase. However, the lack of an appropriate animal model has left the in vivo roles of chymase unclear. To approach this problem, a transgenic mouse (TGM) model carrying the h-chymase gene was established. The h-chymase cDNA transgene was constructed with the chicken beta actin promoter and cytomegalovirus immediate early gene enhancer, and injected into mouse oocytes. Homozygous mice with a high copy number of the h-chymase gene suffered from intrauterine death. In three heterozygous TGM lines, h-chymase transgene expression was detected in entire organs, including the heart, vessels, skin, liver, lung, and brain. The h-chymase immunoreactivity was localized in the extracellular matrices of each organ, especially on the basement membranes of vessels. Aortic and hepatic chymase-dependent angiotensin II formations were significantly higher than those in the wild-type littermates. Three independent TGM lines showed the same phenotypic changes: elevation of blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, emaciation with reduction in the lipid tissue, leukocytosis, and oligotrichia. The angiotensin II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist valsartan suppressed the elevated blood pressure completely and left ventricular hypertrophy incompletely, but did not affect the other phenotypes. These data suggested that in vivo expression of h-chymase caused mild hypertension (AT1 receptor-dependent) with left ventricular hypertrophy (partially AT1 receptor-dependent), and also chronic inflammatory changes (AT1 receptor-independent).

Comparison of nifedipine retard with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in Japanese hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: the Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases-B (JMIC-B) randomized trial.

The Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases-B was performed to investigate whether nifedipine retard treatment was associated with a significantly higher incidence of cardiac events than angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor treatment in Japanese patients. The study used a prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint (PROBE) design. Patients were enrolled at 354 Japanese hospitals specializing in cardiovascular disease. The subjects were 1,650 outpatients aged under 75 years who had diagnoses of both hypertension and coronary artery disease. There were 828 patients subjected to intention-to-treat analysis in the nifedipine retard group and 822 patients in the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor group. The patients were randomized to 3 years of treatment with either nifedipine retard or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor. The primary endpoint was the overall incidence of cardiac events (cardiac death or sudden death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina pectoris or heart failure, serious arrhythmia, and coronary interventions). The primary endpoint occurred in 116 patients (14.0%) from the nifedipine retard group and 106 patients (12.9%) from the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor group (relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.37; p = 0.75). In the Kaplan-Meier estimates, there were no significant differences between the two groups (log-rank test: p = 0.86). The incidence of cardiac events and mortality did not differ between the nifedipine retard and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapies. Nifedipine retard seems to be as effective as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in reducing the incidence of cardiac events and mortality.

Nifedipine retard was as effective as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in preventing cardiac events in high-risk hypertensive patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease: the Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases-B (JMIC-B) subgroup analysis.

We stratified findings from the Japan Multicenter Investigation for Cardiovascular Diseases-B according to whether or not the patients had diabetes and compared the incidence of cardiac events occurring over a 3-year period between treatment with nifedipine retard and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. The primary endpoint was the overall incidence of cardiac events (cardiac death or sudden death, myocardial infarction, hospitalization for angina pectoris or heart failure, serious arrhythmia, and coronary interventions), and the secondary endpoints were a composite of other events (cerebrovascular accidents, worsening of renal dysfunction, non-cardiovascular events, and total mortality). The results showed no significant difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint between the nifedipine group (n=199) and the ACE inhibitor group (n=173) in diabetic patients: 15.08% vs. 15.03%, relative risk 1.06, p=0.838. Also in nondiabetic patients, no significant difference was observed between the former (n=629) and the latter (n=649): 13.67% vs. 12.33%, relative risk 1.04, p=0.792. Similar results were obtained for the incidence of the secondary endpoints: in diabetic patients, 5.03% vs. 5.20%, relative risk 0.89, p=0.799; in nondiabetic patients, 2.70% vs. 2.47%, relative risk 1.07, p=0.842. Achieved blood pressure levels were 138/76 and 136/77 mmHg in the nifedipine group and 140/78 and 138/79 mmHg in the ACE inhibitor group in diabetic and nondiabetic patients, respectively. This study showed that nifedipine retard was as effective as ACE inhibitors in reducing the incidence of cardiac events in extremely high-risk hypertensive patients with complications of diabetes and coronary artery disease.

Clinical effects of rosuvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, in Japanese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: an early phase II study.

The effects and tolerability of the new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor rosuvastatin were assessed in 68 hypercholesterolemic Japanese patients (22 men and 46 postmenopausal women; age range 28-72 years) in a multicenter, double-blind, dose-ranging, early phase II study. Patients were randomized into three groups and received once-daily doses of 1, 2, or 4 mg rosuvastatin. Sixty evaluable patients (19 men and 41 women) with mean total cholesterol (TC) 294 mg/dl (7.60 mmol/l) and mean triglyceride (TG) 150 mg/dl (1.69 mmol/l) provided data in the efficacy analysis based on percentage changes in lipids at 4 and 8 weeks. All doses of rosuvastatin improved lipid parameters after both 4 and 8 weeks of therapy. On average, TC decreases were 22-29%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) decreases 32-42%, TG decreases 2% to 22%, and HDL-C increases 3-7%. There were no remarkable differences between efficacy at 4 and at 8 weeks, and dose-dependent reductions were noted for LDL-C, with 30, 39, and 42% decreases in the 1-, 2-, and 4-mg/ day dose groups, respectively, at 8 weeks. The drug was well tolerated over the 8 weeks of therapy. These preliminary results indicate that rosuvastatin is a potent cholesterol-lowering agent, capable of achieving marked reductions in LDL-C even at low doses.

An Outbreak of Penicillin-Resistant Streptococcus Pneumoniae Infections on an Internal Medicine Ward.

An outbreak of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) infections occurred in our hospital between January and May of 1993. Nine patients with infections/colonizations were located in 3 multiplebed rooms on an internal medicine ward. Two of the 9 patients developed pneumonia, 3 developed acute bronchitis, and 4 patients demonstrated colonization in the respiratory tract. Only 1 case of acute bronchitis was confirmed as a community-acquired infection, while the others were considered nosocomial infections, subsequently shown to be caused by at least 2 different bacterial strains. The cases of pneumonia were thought to be cross-infections transmitted by droplets. All patients with either pneumonia or bronchitis were cured by the administration of various antibiotics, including imipenem and ofloxacin. Of the 4 colonization cases, 3 patients were treated with antibiotics and the organisms successfully eradicated. Although all 5 patients with infections were cured, it is important to be attentive to the emergence of PRSP infections, as there are potential difficulties in the treatment of this organism.

Sex differences in response to angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in elderly, high-risk, hypertensive Japanese patients: a subanalysis of the OSCAR study.

The OlmeSartan Calcium Antagonists Randomized (OSCAR) study is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded, end point study of elderly hypertensive Japanese patients that compared the efficacy of a high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) treatment to an ARB plus calcium channel blocker (CCB) combination. In this pre-specified subgroup analysis, we compared the response to such therapy according to sex. A total of 1164 patients (515 (44%) men and 649 (56%) women) were included, and each gender was split into two nearly equal treatment groups. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular events and non-cardiovascular death. The baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups in each sex were similar, except for some variables. Male patients had lower systolic and higher diastolic blood pressure than female patients (156.8/85.7 vs. 158.5/84.2 mm Hg). At the end of the study, the mean systolic pressure was higher in the ARB group (134.4 mm Hg) than in the ARB plus CCB group (131.5 mm Hg; P=0.03) for men but not for women (135.4 vs. 133.4 mm Hg; P=0.12). For men, the primary outcome events tended to be higher in the ARB group than in the ARB plus CCB group (hazard ratio (HR)=1.66; P=0.055) but not for women (HR=0.97; P=0.92). This difference in men was due to cardiovascular events (HR=1.86; P=0.03). The interaction between sex and treatment group was not significant (P=0.17). These findings suggest that, in addition to blood pressure control, appropriate patient risk assessment is important for the treatment of hypertension, especially in male patients, as opposed to possible sex differences in treatment effects.

Angiotensin II receptor blocker-based therapy in Japanese elderly, high-risk, hypertensive patients.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker therapy or angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker combination therapy is better in elderly hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risk. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of these treatments in elderly, high-risk Japanese hypertensive patients. METHODS: The OlmeSartan and Calcium Antagonists Randomized (OSCAR) study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point study of 1164 hypertensive patients aged 65 to 84 years with type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension during treatment with olmesartan 20 mg/d were randomly assigned to receive 40 mg/d olmesartan (high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker) or a calcium channel blocker + 20 mg/d olmesartan (angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker). The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular events and noncardiovascular death. RESULTS: During a 3-year follow-up, blood pressure was significantly lower in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group than in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group. Mean blood pressure at 36 months was 135.0/74.3 mm Hg in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group and 132.6/72.6 mm Hg in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group. More primary end points occurred in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group than in the angiotensin II receptor blocker + calcium channel blocker group (58 vs 48 events, hazard ratio [HR], 1.31, 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.92; P=.17). In patients with cardiovascular disease at baseline, more primary events occurred in the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker group (HR, 1.63, P=.03); in contrast, fewer events were observed in the subgroup without cardiovascular disease (HR, 0.52, P=.14). This treatment-by-subgroup interaction was significant (P=.02). CONCLUSION: The angiotensin II receptor blocker and calcium channel blocker combination lowered blood pressure more than the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker and reduced the incidence of primary end points more than the high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker in patients with cardiovascular disease. The addition of a second antihypertensive agent is more effective at lowering blood pressure than simply doubling the dose of an existing agent.

Salt-induced hemodynamic regulation mediated by nitric oxide.

Excess daily salt intake impairs vasodilatation and enhances vasoconstriction, resulting in reduction of regional blood flow and elevation of blood pressure in healthy individuals and hypertensive patients with either salt sensitivity or not tested for salt sensitivity or not evaluated for salt sensitivity. The mechanism may involve decreased production of nitric oxide via endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), impaired bioavailability of nitric oxide, and elevated plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). Experimental animals, irrespective of salt sensitivity, although less extensive in those with salt-resistance, fed a high-salt diet have deteriorated endothelial functions; the mechanisms involved include an impairment of eNOS activation, a decrease in eNOS expression, and an increase in oxidative stress and ADMA. The imbalance of interactions between nitric oxide and angiotensin II is also involved in salt sensitivity. Deficiency of nitric oxide formed via neuronal NOS and inducible NOS may contribute to salt-induced hypertension. Reduced daily salt intake, therefore, would be the most rational prophylactic measure against the development of hypertension.