RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A real-time biomarker in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) would be useful for clinical decision-making during treatment. Neurofilament light chain (NfL) can be detected in blood in the case of neuroaxonal damage. The aim of the study was to compare the levels of plasma NfL (pNfL) according to the type of chemotherapeutic agent and the severity of CIPN. METHODS: This single-center prospective observational longitudinal study included patients treated with paclitaxel (TX; n = 34), brentuximab vedotin (BV; n = 29), or oxaliplatin (PT; n = 19). All patients were assessed using the Total Neuropathy Score-clinical version and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events before, during, and up to 6-12 months after the end of treatment. Nerve conduction studies (NCS) were performed before and after chemotherapy discontinuation. Consecutive plasma samples were analyzed for NfL levels using a Simoa® analyzer. Changes in pNfL were compared between groups and were eventually correlated with clinical and NCS data. Clinically relevant (CR) CIPN was considered to be grade ≥ 2. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients, mostly women (59.8%), were included. One third of the patients who received TX (29.4%), BV (31%), or PT (36.8%) developed CR-CIPN, respectively, without differences among them (p = 0.854). Although pNfL significantly increased during treatment and decreased throughout the recovery period in all three groups, patients receiving TX showed significantly greater and earlier changes in pNfL levels compared to the other agents (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A variable change in pNfL is observed depending on the type of agent and mechanism of neurotoxicity with comparable CIPN severity, strongly implying the need to identify different cutoff values for each agent.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos , Síndromes Neurotóxicas , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos/sangue , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/sangue , Idoso , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Longitudinais , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/sangue , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Biomarcadores/sangue , Oxaliplatina/efeitos adversos , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is perceived differently by patients and physicians, complicating its assessment. Current recommendations advocate combining clinical and patient-reported outcomes measures, but this approach can be challenging in patient care. This multicenter European study aims to bridge the gap between patients' perceptions and neurological impairments by aligning both perspectives to improve treatment decision-making. METHODS: Data were pooled from two prospective studies of subjects (n = 372) with established CIPN. Patient and physician views regarding CIPN were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Total Neuropathy Scale-clinical version (TNSc) items, and the disease-specific quality of life - Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy questionnaire (QLQ-CIPN20) from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). To identify inherent neurotoxic severity patterns, we employed hierarchical cluster analysis optimized with k-means clustering and internally validated by discriminant functional analysis. RESULTS: Both NCI-CTCAE and TNSc demonstrated a significant difference in the distribution of severity grades in relation to QLQ-CIPN20 scores. However, a proportion of subjects with different neurotoxic severity grades exhibited overlapping QLQ-CIPN20 scores. We identified three distinct clusters classifying subjects as having severely impaired, intermediately impaired, and mildly impaired CIPN based on TNSc and QLQ-CIPN20 scores. No differences in demographics, cancer type distribution, or class of drug received were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm the heterogeneity in CIPN perception between patients and physicians and identify three well-differentiated subgroups of patients delineated by degree of CIPN impairment based on scores derived from TNSc and QLQ-CIPN20. A more refined assessment of CIPN could potentially be achieved using the calculator tool derived from the cluster equations in this study. This tool, which facilitates individual patient classification, requires prospective validation.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To define the incidence and risk factors for developing chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (CINP). METHODS: Retrospective, file-based analysis on cancer patients who received any type of conventional chemotherapy and for whom neurological evaluation was asked to reveal the extent of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) with or without CINP. CINP was assessed by means of the PI-NRS and Douleur Neuropathique-4 questionnaire. The total neuropathy score-clinical version graded the severity of CIPN. RESULTS: The medical files of 500 chemotherapy-treated cancer patients were reviewed. Any grade chronic CIPN was disclosed in 343 (68.6%) patients and CINP in 127 (37%) of them, corresponding to an overall percentage of 25.4% among all 500 included patients. The logistic regression analysis identified as independent predictors for CINP development the presence of uncomplicated diabetes (OR: 2.17; p = .039) and grade 2-3 chronic CIPN (OR: 1.61; p < .001) as also the administration of combined paclitaxel plus cisplatin (reference variable), compared to oxaliplatin (OR: 0.18; p = .001) and taxanes (OR: 0.16; p < .001). The increased severity of acute OXAIPN was associated with CINP (OR: 4.51; p < .001). OXA-treated patients with persistent CINP presented a worst likelihood to improve after chemotherapy discontinuation, than patients receiving combined paclitaxel plus cisplatin (OR: 50; p < .001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of CINP in our cohort was comparable to previous reports, with severities fluctuating upwards during chemotherapy and declined post-chemotherapy. Uncomplicated diabetes, the combined paclitaxel plus cisplatin treatment and the increased severity of acute oxaliplatin neurotoxicity mostly increase the risk for developing CINP. OXA-treated patients present less possibilities to recover from CINP after chemotherapy discontinuation, than other chemotherapies.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Diabetes Mellitus , Neoplasias , Neuralgia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas , Humanos , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Oxaliplatina/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neuralgia/induzido quimicamente , Neuralgia/epidemiologia , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/epidemiologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: This white paper provides guidance regarding the process for establishing and maintaining international collaborations to conduct oncology/neurology-focused chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) research. METHODS: An international multidisciplinary group of CIPN scientists, clinicians, research administrators, and legal experts have pooled their collective knowledge regarding recommendations for establishing and maintaining international collaboration to foster advancement of CIPN science. RESULTS: Experts provide recommendations in 10 categories: (1) preclinical and (2) clinical research collaboration; (3) collaborators and consortiums; (4) communication; (5) funding; (6) international regulatory standards; (7) staff training; (8) data management, quality control, and data sharing; (9) dissemination across disciplines and countries; and (10) additional recommendations about feasibility, policy, and mentorship. CONCLUSION: Recommendations to establish and maintain international CIPN research collaboration will promote the inclusion of more diverse research participants, increasing consideration of cultural and genetic factors that are essential to inform innovative precision medicine interventions and propel scientific discovery to benefit cancer survivors worldwide. RELEVANCE TO INFORM RESEARCH POLICY: Our suggested guidelines for establishing and maintaining international collaborations to conduct oncology/neurology-focused chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) research set forth a challenge to multinational science, clinical, and policy leaders to (1) develop simple, streamlined research designs; (2) address logistical barriers; (3) simplify and standardize regulatory requirements across countries; (4) increase funding to support international collaboration; and (5) foster faculty mentorship.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Síndromes Neurotóxicas , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico , Humanos , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoal AdministrativoRESUMO
Multiple pathological mechanisms are involved in the development of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN). Recent work has provided insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying chemotherapy-induced axonal degeneration. This review integrates evidence from preclinical and clinical work on the onset, progression and outcome of axonal degeneration in CIPN. We review likely triggers of axonal degeneration in CIPN and highlight evidence of molecular pathways involved in axonal degeneration and their relevance to CIPN, including SARM1-mediated axon degeneration pathway. We identify potential clinical markers of axonal dysfunction to provide early identification of toxicity as well as present potential treatment strategies to intervene in axonal degeneration pathways. A greater understanding of axonal degeneration processes in CIPN will provide important information regarding the development and progression of axonal dysfunction more broadly and will hopefully assist in the development of successful interventions for CIPN and other neurodegenerative disorders.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Doenças Neurodegenerativas , Síndromes Neurotóxicas , Humanos , Axônios/patologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Doenças Neurodegenerativas/patologia , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/metabolismoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of fremanezumab for migraine prophylaxis in patients with failure of at least three previous preventive treatments. Changes in disability as quality-of-life outcomes after fremanezumab treatment were also examined. METHODS: Two hundred and four patients with either high-frequency EM (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM), who attained at least three consecutive monthly sessions with fremanezumab 225 mg and otherwise met the inclusion criteria, were included in the study. The crude response (at least 50% reduction in monthly headache days [MHD]) rates to fremanezumab were assessed. Scores in the following efficacy outcomes were then compared from baseline to the last efficacy evaluation follow-up: (i) MHD, (ii) monthly days with moderate/severe peak headache intensity, and (iii) monthly days with intake of abortive medication. The disability was evaluated with the Migraine Disability Assessment; the quality of life (QOL) status was assessed with the Headache Impact-6 Test, and the EQ-5D questionnaire. RESULTS: In the majority of HFEM cases (n = 81/97; 83.5%) and CM patients (n = 67/107; 62.6%), fremanezumab proved effective in reducing the MHDs by at least 50% and was associated with clinically meaningful improvement in all other efficacy variables. The migraine-related disability experienced by our patients decreased and their QOL increased. We recorded just 36 cases reporting mild adverse events, including pain, rash or pruritus (n = 26), flu-like symptoms (n = 8), and hair loss (n = 2). CONCLUSION: With our prospective results, we provide further real-world data to support the favorable benefit/risk profile of fremanezumab in the prophylaxis of both HFEM and CM.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Grécia , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-Cego , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/prevenção & controle , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/diagnóstico , Cefaleia , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
Background and objectives: Migraine is considered the most clinically important primary headache due to its high prevalence and significant burden. Although globally categorized as one of the leading causes of disability, it is still largely underdiagnosed and undertreated. Worldwide, migraine care is in most cases provided by primary care physicians. The aim of our study was to assess the attitudes of Greek primary care physicians toward treating migraine compared to other common neurological and general medical disorders. Methods: We surveyed 182 primary care physicians with the use of a 5-point questionnaire regarding their preference in treating ten common medical conditions, including migraine, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, upper respiratory tract infections, diabetes mellitus, lower back pain, dizziness, transient ischemic attack, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, and fibromyalgia. Results: Overall, with regards to preference to treat, migraine scored very low (3.6 ± 1.0), next to diabetic peripheral neuropathy (3.6 ± 1.0), and third from the bottom to fibromyalgia (3.25 ± 1.06). In contrast, physicians reported a much higher preference to treat hypertension (4.66 ± 0.60) and hyperlipidemia (4.6 ± 1.0). Conclusions: Our results indicate that Greek primary care physicians dislike treating migraines but also other neurological diseases. Topics for further investigation include the reasons for this dislike, any associations with poor patient satisfaction, treatment results, or both.
Assuntos
Neuropatias Diabéticas , Fibromialgia , Hipertensão , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Humanos , Grécia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/terapia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Hipertensão/terapiaRESUMO
The Greek Society of Migraine and Headache Patients (GSMHP), maintaining a strong commitment to research and information, conducted its second web-based online survey named "Migraine in Greece-2020", following its first one conducted in 2018. The 2020 study included 2,105 migraine patients who were called to answer 151 questions. The purposes of the current research were to record the demographic and clinical characteristics of migraine patients in Greece, including the severity and effects of migraine on respondents' quality of life, as well as to survey the effects of the coronavirus pandemic on the course of migraine. Our population, internet-based study provides data that will hopefully contribute to better comprehend the clinical phenotype and course of migraine during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Humanos , Pandemias , Grécia/epidemiologia , Qualidade de Vida , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , InternetRESUMO
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) diagnosis is largely based on patient reported outcomes. Wearables, sensors, and smart devices may potentially provide early detection and monitoring of CIPN. We systematically reviewed data on wearables, sensors, and smart devices to detect and/or monitor signs and symptoms of CIPN. Moreover, we provide directions and recommendations for future studies. A literature search using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and CINHAL databases was conducted from database inception until March 2021. The search was further updated in July 2022 to ensure currency of results. A total of 1885 records were title-abstract screened, 33 full texts were assessed, and 16 were included. The retrieved papers were heterogeneous in terms of study design, sample size, CIPN severity, chemotherapy agents, type of wearable/sensor/device applied, parameters of interest, and purpose. Data are promising and provide preliminary evidence on wearables, sensors, and smart devices for CIPN detection and monitoring. There are several issues and knowledge gaps that should be addressed. We propose a framework for future studies.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Síndromes Neurotóxicas , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis , Humanos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/diagnóstico , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/terapiaRESUMO
Our aim was to assess the significance of measuring serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels as a biomarker of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (PIPN). We longitudinally measured sNfL in breast cancer patients, scheduled to receive the 12-weekly paclitaxel-based regimen. Patients were clinically examined by means of the Total Neuropathy Score-clinical version (TNSc), while sNfL were quantified, using the highly sensitive Simoa technique, before starting chemotherapy (baseline), after 2 (week 2) and 3 (week 3) weekly courses, and at the end of chemotherapy (week 12). Among 59 included patients (mean age: 53.1 ± 11.5 years), 33 (56%) developed grade 0-1 and 26 (44%) grade 2-3 PIPN at week 12. A significant longitudinal increase of sNfL levels from baseline to week-12 was determined, whereas patients with TNSc grade 2-3 PIPN had significantly increased sNfL levels at week 12, compared to those with grade 0-1. receiver-operated characteristics (ROC) analysis defined a value of NfL of >85 pg/mL at week 3 as the best discriminative determination to predict the development of grade 2-3 PIPN at week 12 (sensitivity 46.2%, specificity 84.8%). The logistic binary regression analysis revealed that age > 50 years and the cutoff of >85 pg/mL of sNfL levels at week 3 independently predicted the development of grade 2-3 PIPN at week 12 with a sensitivity of 46%, a specificity of 91%, and a positive and negative predictive values of 75% and 67%, respectively. sNfL levels seem to be a valuable biomarker of neuro-axonal injury in PIPN. An early increase of this biomarker after a 3-weekly chemotherapy course can be a predictive marker of final PIPN severity.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Síndromes Neurotóxicas , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico , Adulto , Biomarcadores , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Filamentos Intermediários , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas de Neurofilamentos , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/diagnóstico , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/tratamento farmacológico , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) demonstrated a positive benefit-risk in chronic migraine (CM) patients in PREEMPT I and II phase III trials and many subsequent real-world studies. We herein aimed at evaluating the adherence to repeated BoNTA over a period of five years, while secondary objectives included the assessment of its long-term safety/efficacy and patients' satisfaction to treatment. METHODS: We studied 56 CM patients who had successfully received consequent cycles of BoNTA over five years. Adherence was calculated as the percentage of patients actively choosing to follow with repeated BoNTA treatment, as instructed. Safety and efficacy data were collected throughout the study period. The overall patients' belief in and satisfaction by the efficacy of treatment was assessed at last follow-up, using the self-report 7-point measure patient global impression of change (PGIC). RESULTS: A total of 36 (64.3%) out of 56 patients remained adherent to BoNTA over five years. Long-term BoNTA exposure was safe and well-tolerated, without severe side-effects justifying treatment discontinuation. The mean monthly headache days and associated clinical efficacy outcomes remained consistent and quite low at last follow-up with evidence of continuous improvements in headache monthly frequency between year three and over five years of therapy. All patients who were able to maintain treatment over five years (n = 36), remained very satisfied and scored at least 5 in PGIC. CONCLUSION: Considerably high adherence, considerable satisfaction and sustained safety/efficacy were observed in patients followed up for five years, supporting a favorable benefit/risk profile for consistently delivering long-term BoNTA in CM.
Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/efeitos adversos , Cefaleia , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/prevenção & controle , Satisfação do PacienteRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively assess the utility of serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels in identifying the risk to develop chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI) in cancer patients. We also examined if sNfL can be identified as an early biomarker of CICI development. METHODS: We longitudinally measured sNfL levels in 20 female patients with breast cancer, scheduled to receive the 12 weekly paclitaxel-based regimen. An equal number of age-matched female heathy subjects was incuded as control group. CICI was graded by means of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale (MOCA); peripheral neurotoxicity (PN) was graded using the neurosensory Common Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)v5.0, while sNfL levels were quantified using a high-sensitive technique (Quanterix, Simoa) before the administration of chemotherapy (T0), after 3 courses (T1), and at the end of chemotherapy (T2). RESULTS: Pre-treatment sNfL levels were comparable in patients and controls (p = 0.103). At T2, 5/20 patients (mean age 61.4 ± 5.0 years) developed CICI. These 5 patients also had clinically-significant PN. Patients with and without CICI had comparable sNfL values at T2 (p = 0.1). In addition, at T2, sNfL levels did not correlate significantly with MOCA score in CICI patients (p = 0.604). The difference of sNfL levels between T1 and T0 failed to predict independently the occurrence of CICI at T2. CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support the utility of measuring sNfL levels as a biomarker of CICI. Grade 2-3 PN most strongly confounded our outcomes. Considering the small sample size, which might have prevented the results from being extrapolated, further testing in larger studies is warranted.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Disfunção Cognitiva , Esclerose Múltipla , Idoso , Biomarcadores , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Cognitiva/induzido quimicamente , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Filamentos Intermediários , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To report a case of isolated optic neuritis associated with pembrolizumab immunotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old man, with a history of metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma, presented with vision loss in his left eye for the past week. He had been treated with pembrolizumab for the underlying disease for 2 months. On presentation, best corrected visual acuity was 20/30 in the right eye and 20/200 in the left eye. Fundoscopy revealed optic nerve edema in the left eye. Visual fields examination in right eye revealed an enlarged blind spot and an extended defect in the inferior nasal quadrant. In the left eye a partial superior arcuate defect and an extended defect in the inferior hemisphere was observed. The mean deviation was -12.15 dB in the right eye and -13.70 dB in left eye. Pembrolizumab was withheld and corticosteroids were administered for a total of nine weeks, first intravenously and then slowly tapered orally, resulting in resolution of optic neuritis, restoration of visual acuity and in relative improvement in the visual field defects after 3 months. Calculated Naranjo Nomogram score was 7, indicating a 'highly probable' correlation. CONCLUSIONS: Optic neuritis is a relatively rare immune-related adverse event after exposure to checkpoint inhibitors cancer immunotherapy. Prompt discontinuation of the offending agent and early initiation of corticosteroid therapy is the mainstay of the treatment.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neurite Óptica , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Neurite Óptica/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos da VisãoRESUMO
Background and Objectives: The Greek Society of Migraine and Headache Patients conducted, in 2020, its second online survey, titled "Migraine in Greece-2020", after publication of the first similar online survey conducted in 2018. To compare the current findings with the corresponding data obtained in 2018, we herein release the second part of results obtained from the 2020 survey on the efficacy of preventive and symptomatic anti-migraine medications and the patients' reported satisfaction with these treatments. Materials and Methods: We surveyed 2105 migraine patients from all over Greece with the use of a 151-questions specific migraine-focused questionnaire in Greek language, which was distributed through the online research software "SurveyMonkey". Results: Triptans were mostly used with efficacy for the symptomatic relief of migraine attacks. About 2 of 3 surveyed patients had received various prophylactic oral medications and the majority of them discontinued these prophylactic medications as a result of inefficacy/safety issues. BoNTA was reported to be effective only when administration was commenced by a trained neurologist/headache specialist, while our current findings are generally comparable to those obtained in our 2018 pre-COVID-19 survey and the pandemic has not imposed any significant attitudes on migraine therapies and corresponding patients' satisfaction. Conclusion: Although a market change is anticipated with the evolving widespread use of anti-CGRPs monoclonal antibodies or gepants in the symptomatic and prophylactic treatment of migraine, it is of great interest to review published results of larger longitudinal population-based studies to further ascertain the satisfaction of patients to migraine therapies.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos de Enxaqueca , Humanos , Satisfação do Paciente , Grécia , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/prevenção & controle , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cefaleia , Satisfação Pessoal , InternetRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The neuromuscular complications of cancer therapy include chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN), immune-related neuromuscular complications to immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiation-induced neuropathy/plexopathy. With a wider focus on CIPN, we will discuss new pathogenetic insights, recent predictive biomarkers and emerging therapies for neuromuscular complications of cancer therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Findings from recent preclinical studies have improved our knowledge on new CIPN pathogenetic pathways, including the activation of senescence-like processes in neurons, axonal degeneration and neuroinflammation. Metabolomics and serum neurofilament light chain levels appear the most promising biomarkers to predict CIPN development and severity. There is some recent evidence of promising pharmacological compounds to prevent or treat CIPN, and new drugs are in early development and testing. SUMMARY: A multimodal assessment, with neurophysiological, imaging and patient-reported outcome measures, coupled with the use of reliable blood or genetic biomarkers, may offer pathogenetic grounds for future preventive and symptomatic strategies for the multidisciplinary treatment of neuromuscular complications of cancer therapy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias , Síndromes Neurotóxicas , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Neuroinflamatórias , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
The objective of this observational study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duloxetine in a cohort of 100 cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN). CIPN was graded employing the TNSc and the NCI-CTCv4. The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale measured the efficacy of duloxetine (1: no benefit; to 7: excellent response). A clinically meaningful response was considered a PGIC > 4. Median age was 62 (29-81) years and 42% were male. CIPN was graded as grades 1, 2 and 3 in 20, 66, and 14% of patients, respectively. Median time to duloxetine initiation was 6 (1-63) months after chemotherapy. Fifty-seven patients early dropped out from duloxetine, due to lack of efficacy (20%) or side effects (37%). Male patients more frequently discontinued duloxetine due to lack of efficacy (35.7 vs. 8.6% P = 0.001). PGIC scores were higher in female patients (4 vs. 1, P = 0.001), taxane-treated patients (4 vs. 1, P = 0.042) and with short-lasting (<6 months) CIPN (4 vs. 1, P = 0.008). Patients with long-lasting CIPN had a higher rate of adverse events (47 vs. 27%, P = 0.038) and discontinuation (54.8 vs. 45.1%, P = 0.023). In the multivariate analysis, female gender and short-lasting CIPN were independently associated with a favorable response to duloxetine. Low tolerability, male gender, and long-lasting CIPN significantly limited duloxetine use in daily practice setting. A minority of cancer survivors with CIPN treated with duloxetine had a meaningful CIPN improvement, and tolerability was overall low. Female gender and short-term CIPN were independently associated with a favorable response to duloxetine.
Assuntos
Sobreviventes de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Cloridrato de Duloxetina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/patologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/patologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Prognóstico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
We investigated whether rechallenge with oxaliplatin (OXA) can worsen the pre-existing oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OXAIPN) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Patients previously treated with OXA, having clinically significant grade 1 or 2 OXAIPN were assessed, after receiving rechallenge with OXA, using the clinical version of the Total Neuropathy Score (TNSc). Peripheral neuropathy was assessed at the end of first OXA exposure and at completion of OXA rechallenge. The first line OXA-based chemotherapy was completed at least 9 months earlier (OXA-free interval). We studied 25 mCRC patients, 14 males and 11 females, with a median age of 63 (35-77) years. After their first exposure to OXA-based chemotherapy, 9 (36%) patients developed grade 1 OXAIPN and 16 patients grade 2 (64%) neurotoxicity. OXA reintroduction with a median of 10 (8-14) cycles led to grade 1 OXAIPN in two patients (8%), grade 2 in 19 patients (76%), and grade 3 neuropathy in 4 (16%) patients Worsening of pre-existing OXAIPN was documented in seven (28%) patients and was significantly associated with higher OXA delivered cumulative dose (P < .001). Median TNSc scores following treatment (10; range 4-18) were significantly increased (P < .001), when compared to the scores recorded at the end of first line treatment (8; range 2-12). Rechallenging OXA appears to relatively worsen the severity of existing OXAIPN. However, the majority of rechallenged patients developed a clinically significant (grade 2) OXAIPN, rather than treatment-emergent grade 3. As such, OXA rechallenge might be a feasible option in patients previously having OXAIPN.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Intoxicação do Sistema Nervoso por Metais Pesados/etiologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Oxaliplatina/farmacologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Adulto , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/toxicidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Oxaliplatina/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina/toxicidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
We report the outcome of a pilot, open-label study that tested the potential of lacosamide (200 mg/bi.d) as an effective and safe symptomatic treatment against acute painful oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OXAIPN). Lacosamide was introduced in 18 colorectal cancer patients with evidence of clinically significant acute, painful OXAIPN after infusion of the third course (T1) of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX4) and was maintained until completion of all 12 courses (T4). The OXA-Neuropathy Questionnaire (OXA-NQ) was used to record the severity of acute OXAIPN; the PI-NRS estimated the severity of neuropathic pain, while the chronic OXAIPN was graded with TNSc. The EuroQOL (EQ-5D) instrument was also applied. The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale measured the lacosamide-attributed perception of change. LCM-responders were considered those with ≥50% reduction in PI-NRS and OXA-NQ scores at T4, compared to T1. Patients experienced on T1 a median number of acute OXAIPN symptoms of 4 and had a median neuropathic pain severity score of 6, which was strongly related to lower quality of life, according to EQ-VAS (P < .001). At T4, 12 patients (66.7%) were classified as responders. A significant clinical improvement was documented in the severity of acute OXAIPN and neuropathic pain in relation to lacosamide (P < .001) at T4 compared to T1, which was associated with improved EQ-VAS scores (P < .001). Twelve patients scored PGIC ≥5 (lacosamide-attributed) at T4. There were no incidences of early drop-outs for safety reasons. Lacosamide appears to be an effective and well-tolerated symptomatic treatment against acute, painful OXAIPN.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/toxicidade , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Lacosamida/farmacologia , Neuralgia/tratamento farmacológico , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/tratamento farmacológico , Oxaliplatina/toxicidade , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/tratamento farmacológico , Bloqueadores do Canal de Sódio Disparado por Voltagem/farmacologia , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Lacosamida/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuralgia/induzido quimicamente , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Oxaliplatina/administração & dosagem , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Bloqueadores do Canal de Sódio Disparado por Voltagem/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are associated with various neurological adverse events (NAEs). We herein explored the incidence and clinical phenotype of immune-related NAEs in cancer patients. Medical records of ICI-treated cancer patients were reviewed between the years 2010 and 2018, with an aim to characterize immuno-related NAEs. A total of 1185 ICIs-treated patients were identified, 63.7% of which were males and 36.3% were females, with a mean age of 63.4 ± 7.3 years. Twenty-four from the overall ICIs-treated patients (2%) developed NAEs. No differences were identified in terms of age, sex, tumor type and class of ICIs between the patients who developed NAEs and those who did not. The median number of cycles of ICI treatment before NAEs onset were 4.5 (1-10), and the median time was 102 days. Peripheral nervous system (PNS) involvement was present in 14 patients (58.4%) and central nervous system (CNS) involvement in 10 (33.3%), including 2 patients with aseptic meningitis and polyradicular involvement. Amongst PNS complications, there were five (20.8%) with axonal sensory neuropathies, four (16.7%) with Guillain-Barre-like syndromes, and four (16.7%) with myositis and/or myasthenic syndromes. The majority of patients with PNS-related NAEs (n = 11; 78.6%) improved after ICIs discontinuation and treatment with immune-modulating therapies. The time to neuromuscular toxicities onset was significantly shorter, compared to CNS NAEs (median 70 vs 119 days, P = .037). Immune-related NAEs mostly present with neuromuscular complications. Discontinuation of ICIs and appropriate treatment should be commenced early throughout the process, in order to maximize a favorable outcome.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/toxicidade , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central/fisiopatologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/fisiopatologia , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/toxicidade , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Neuromusculares/fisiopatologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/fisiopatologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central/induzido quimicamente , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/administração & dosagem , Fatores Imunológicos/farmacologia , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Neuromusculares/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Neuromusculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Neuromusculares/epidemiologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/tratamento farmacológico , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/epidemiologia , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/induzido quimicamente , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/epidemiologiaRESUMO
AIM: To identify the risk factors of falls in a well-characterized cohort of cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 122 cancer patients experiencing any grade of CIPN, following completion of different chemotherapeutic regimens for various non-hematological malignancies. The results of the clinical examination were summarized by means of the Total Neuropathy Score-clinical version (TNSc®). A neurophysiological examination was also carried out. RESULTS: Among 122 patients, 21 (17.2%) of them reported falls. These were 7 males and 14 females with a mean age of 57.3 ± 8.1 years. All of them (21; 100%) had grade 3 CIPN, according to TNSc® with a median value of 15. Univariate analysis showed that the following variables were strongly associated with falls: TNSc® score of > 14 corresponding to grade 3 CIPN, evidence of motor impairment, evidence of sensory ataxia with positive Romberg sign, and decrease of sural a-SAP > 50% from the baseline value. Multivariate regression analysis failed to define independent predictors of falls. However, ROC analysis demonstrated that a discriminative TNSc® cutoff value of > 14 predicted falls with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 87%, whereas sensory ataxia predicted falls with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 83%. CONCLUSION: Grade 3 CIPN, as assessed with TNSc®, and evidence of sensory ataxia with a positive Romberg sign were strongly associated with an increased risk of falls. Although our results need further validation, the TNSc® scale appears to be a practical and easy tool for identifying patients at higher risk of falling.