Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Wound J ; 12(3): 285-92, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23742125

RESUMO

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common postoperative complication and can cause avoidable morbidity and excessive costs for the health service. Novel dressings, designed specifically for postoperative wounds, can help to reduce the risk of SSI and other complications such as blistering. This study compared the use of a new polyurethane film surgical dressing (Opsite Post-Op Visible, Smith & Nephew, Hull, UK) with gauze and tape in the management of postoperative wounds. The results show that the polyurethane film dressing results in a significant reduction in SSI (1·4% versus 6·6%, P = 0·006) as well as a reduction in other postoperative wound complications (e.g. blistering and erythema). Economic analysis conducted alongside the study suggests that these improved outcomes can be achieved at a lower treatment cost than gauze and tape dressings. The modest incremental cost of the polyurethane film surgical dressing is easily offset by the reduction in the costs related to treating SSI and other wound complications associated with gauze and tape dressings.


Assuntos
Poliuretanos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/terapia , Cicatrização , Análise Custo-Benefício , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Curativos Oclusivos , Período Pós-Operatório , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/economia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Rev Enferm ; 35(11): 27-32, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23330329

RESUMO

Chronic wounds represent a drain on the Spanish health system, nowdays is necessary an optimization of the resources used and that is for this that is necessary justify the use of the products over others through cost-effective studies for to show the economic benefit to professionals and the life quality of patient. This article compares the use of a new technology for format polyurethane foam, TLC-NOSF, with the most commonly used products for treating wounds. This comparison is made using a cost-effectiveness model (Markov Model). The results demonstrate that treatment with polyurethane foam dressing with TLC-NOSF are cost-effective versus treatments with polyurethane foams most commonly used in Spain.


Assuntos
Bandagens/economia , Úlcera da Perna/terapia , Poliuretanos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA