Hybrid fractional laser facial resurfacing: A comparison between a single treatment at high settings versus multiple treatments at low to moderate settings.

OBJECTIVES: Fractional laser treatments for facial skin rejuvenation is an evolving field with the increase of innovative technologies. Typically, better results are achieved by using more aggressive approaches although this is accompanied by an increased risk. The demand for a modality that combines efficacy with minimal downtime and risk of adverse events led to the development of a hybrid laser, which delivers a fractional treatment of ablative CO2 and nonablative 1570 nm lasers, simultaneously. This study compares the clinical results, side effects, and downtime profile of the hybrid laser in multiple low-to-moderate-setting treatments versus a single high-setting treatment in the facial area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 44 patients who underwent 1-3 treatments with the hybrid laser for facial rejuvenation between the years 2020-2022. The patients were divided into two groups based on the number of treatments they had received (Group A; single high-setting treatment, Group B; 2-3 low-to-moderate setting treatments). Three independent nontreating physicians evaluated the objective improvement by assessing the patients' standardized clinical photographs before and after the treatments, using three different scales. Treatment data, adverse events, and patients' satisfaction in each group were also reviewed. RESULTS: A superiority to 2-3 low-to-moderate setting treatments (Group B) was found in most of the evaluated scales. Patients' satisfaction was significantly higher in Group B, and the average downtime was significantly lower: 4.3 ± 1.6 days versus 7.3 ± 2.3 days in Group A. The expected treatment effects were significantly milder in severity in Group B as graded by the patients, and no adverse events were reported in this group. An average overall improvement of 51%-75% according to Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) was found in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The new hybrid laser generates remarkable clinical outcomes in facial rejuvenation. Performing several treatments at mild to moderate settings can lead to a safer and more favorable procedure while maintaining high efficacy and achieving higher patients' satisfaction.

Fractional Radiofrequency and Oral Isotretinoin-A Prospective Randomized Controlled Split-Face Trial Comparing Concurrent Versus Delayed Fractional Radiofrequency Treatment for Acne Scars.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic dogma has been to treat acne scars no less than 6 months after isotretinoin (ITN) cessation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fractional radiofrequency (FRF) in patients treated concurrently with ITN. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized control 3-arm comparative trial to evaluate the treatment of acne scars. Patients received one of three treatment options: (A) ITN and FRF concurrent treatment, (B) ITN monotherapy, and (C) FRF 6 months post-ITN treatment. Patients in the FRF cohorts received three monthly sessions. Patients were followed for adverse effects up to 6-9 months post-FRF treatment. Final cosmesis was scored by three independent dermatologists using two scales: the Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acne (ECCA) and an internal 5-point investigator's scale, indicating the percentage of improvement. Subjective analyses by patients were also assessed. RESULTS: Objective and subjective analyses revealed improvement in the ITN-FRF cohort, which was superior to the delayed FRF cohort and the ITN monotherapy cohort. Specifically, the concurrently treated cohort (ITN-FRF) had a significant reduction in acne scar volume from baseline mean (151.1 ± 44.7 to 97.0 ± 31.2, p < 0.005), outperforming both the delayed FRF and monotherapy ITN treatment cohorts, respectively (155.4 ± 37.8 to 122.0 ± 46.2, 144.6 ± 82.8 to 132.4 ± 62.7). Additionally, the concurrently treated cohort demonstrated improved ECCA scores (36.8 ± 15.5), significantly better than the ITN monotherapy cohort (101.5 ± 20.1, p < 0.01). LIMITATIONS: Limited patient sample size: 38 patients completed the study; mostly Fitzpatrick Type II-III skin; photographic assessments utilized. CONCLUSION: Per our prospective trial, concurrent treatment of ITN-FRF is superior to delayed FRF treatment 6 months post-ITN cessation.

Fractional ablative CO2 laser and oral isotretinoin-A prospective randomized controlled split-face trial comparing concurrent versus delayed laser treatment for acne scars.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic dogma has been to treat acne scars with ablative fractional laser no less than 6 months after isotretinoin (ITN) cessation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of fractional ablative CO2 laser (FACL) in patients treated concurrently with ITN. METHODS: We conducted a prospective split-face randomized control trial in patients treated with FACL concurrently with ITN versus patients treated with FACL 6 months post-ITN treatment. Patients received 3 monthly sessions of FACL with concurrent ITN treatment on half of the face; the other side of the face received the same FACL treatment regimen 6 months post-ITN cessation. Patients were followed for adverse effects up to 6 months post-FACL treatment. Final cosmesis was scored using the Quantitative Global Acne Scarring Grading System (GASGS) by three independent dermatologists. RESULTS: The GASGS of the concurrent ITN-FACL treated side of the face was significantly lower than the side treated with delayed laser therapy (4.7 ± 2.5 vs. 7.7 ± 2.9, respectively, p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: The laser's settings were standardized, and not adjusted per patient skin type. CONCLUSION: Per our prospective trial, concurrent treatment of FACL -ITN is superior to delayed FACL treatment 6 months post-ITN cessation. Fractional ablative laser treatment is effective in improving acne scars, which persist despite isotretinoin therapy.

Percutaneous delivery of liquid tetracycline using a thermal resurfacing drug delivery system for the treatment of festoons.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of percutaneous tetracycline delivery to the malar area using a thermomechanical device (Tixel) in patients suffering from festoons. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent combination treatment with a thermomechanical device (Tixel) followed by application of topical tetracycline 1% at two private clinics between 2019 and 2023. Demographic and medical data, treatment parameters along with before and after treatment photographs were retrieved retrospectively. All patients were asked to answer a questionnaire, assessing self-reported pre and posttreatment disturbance, patient global impression of change (PGIC) score, overall satisfaction with treatment, and the onset and duration of treatment effect. Finally, three masked reviewers evaluated and graded the severity of before and after treatment photographs. RESULTS: Twenty healthy patients received the combination treatment. The mean age was 59.4 ± 8.2 years (range: 45-72 years), and 90.0% (n = 18) were female. The number of treatment sessions per patient ranged from 2 to 8, mean of 5.0 ± 1.9, performed at 5.4 ± 1.2-week intervals. The masked reviewers' grading scores demonstrated a significant improvement (2.81 ± 1.3 before vs. 1.6 ± 1.1 after, p < 0.001). The self-reported disturbance caused by the festoons improved significantly as well (4.7 ± 0.98 vs. 1.7 ± 1.1, p < 0.001). On the PGIC score, 85% (17/20) reported moderate (grade 5) to significant (grade 7) improvement of symptoms and life quality after treatment. Improvement onset was reported to occur 11.2 ± 6.6 days after the first treatment (range 2-30 days), and 90% (18/20) of the patients reported improvement lasting at least 4 months after completion of the second treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Topical tetracycline application following Tixel treatment induced significant improvement in patient with festoons.

Optimal Changes Seen in Patients After Treatment With Poly- l -Lactic Acid: A Retrospective Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: Poly- l -lactic acid (PLLA) is a biostimulator that enhances collagen production and leads to volume restoration. It became popular because of its improvement of facial wrinkles and long-lasting effect, although the specific visible changes it causes in the facial area are not fully described. OBJECTIVE: To identify and characterize the visible changes resulting from injecting PLLA into the facial area. METHODS: A list of 678 patients who underwent 2 to 3 treatments with PLLA injections in this center between 2021 and 2022 were retrieved. After 2 rounds of evaluations, 31 independent international evaluators described the 3 main changes they observed in the before-and-after images (taken approximately 7 months after the last injection session) of the 12 patients with the most significant improvement. RESULTS: A total of 1,015 descriptions were received. They were divided into categories based upon similarity. The main detected changes were better contouring and enhancement of the lateral face, a lifting effect and secondary impact on the nasolabial fold, and improvement of skin texture and skin firmness. CONCLUSION: Poly- l -lactic acid injections were judged to be effective for contouring, lifting, and improving skin texture in the facial area. Further research is needed to validate these results and create an assessment scale for PLLA injections.

The Safety and Efficacy of a Dual CO 2 and 1570-nm Hybrid Laser for Periorbital Rejuvenation.

BACKGROUND: Many modalities are used for periorbital rejuvenation, with a wide range of efficacy and safety. To achieve favorable outcomes with minimal downtime and adverse effects, professionals developed a hybrid laser, which allows simultaneous treatment with 2 wavelengths: fractional ablative and fractional nonablative lasers. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new hybrid laser for periorbital rejuvenation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-center study includes 24 patients who underwent a single-pass treatment with a CO 2 and 1570-nm hybrid laser for periorbital rejuvenation between 2020 and 2022. Patients' standardized clinical photographs before and after the treatment were assessed by 4 independent physicians for objective improvement. Treatment data, safety, and patients' satisfaction were also reviewed. RESULTS: Statistically significant objective improvements were found in all investigated scales with an improvement of 1 to 2 points on each scale. Patients' satisfaction was 3.1/4. Average downtime was 5.9 ± 1.7 days. Most adverse effects were mild to moderate in severity (89.7%), including erythema, crusting, pruritis, edema, and hyperpigmentation. CONCLUSION: After a single-pass treatment, the laser generates 26% to 50% improvement in the periorbital area, with a strong safety profile and a relatively simple recovery. Further research is needed to validate the efficacy of this technology compared with more aggressive modalities.

Comparison of 2 Hyaluronic Acid-based Fillers for the Treatment of Acne Scars: Structural Lifting Versus Biostimulatory Effect.

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers are effective at mitigating acne scars due to their filling effect. Complexes of high and low molecular weight HA demonstrated a delayed biostimulatory effect. OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to compare the results of acne scar treatment using a filler composed of complexes of high and low molecular weight HA versus a traditional cross-linking HA filler. METHODS: Thirty patients with moderate-to-severe atrophic acne scarring were included in this prospective, split-face, double-blinded, randomized controlled study. Each underwent 3 monthly injections of a novel formula of combined high and low molecular weight HA (P) to the base of acne scars on 1 side of the face and traditional cross-linking HA (JV) filler on the other. Patients were evaluated 6 months after their last treatment for objective and subjective improvements. RESULTS: For JV, statistically significant reductions were observed in the acne scar volume but nearly no change in elasticity and stretch during early treatments. For P, no significant differences were observed in early treatments; however, statistically significant improvements were observed in later visits. CONCLUSION: Although the traditional JV filler demonstrated an earlier impact than P, the latter produced delayed positive changes that were more pronounced than the traditional filler.

Efficacy and safety of thermomechanical fractional injury-assisted corticosteroid delivery versus intralesional corticosteroid injection for the treatment of hypertrophic scars: A randomized split-scar trial.

BACKGROUND: Disruption of the natural skin barrier in a controlled manner may be used to deliver drugs that enhance scar resolution. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of thermomechanical fractional injury (TMFI)-assisted topical corticosteroid delivery with corticosteroid injection in the treatment of hypertrophic scar (HTS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, split-scar, double-blinded study. Twenty-one subjects with HTS on the abdomen received five split-scar treatments of TMFI + Steroid and steroid injection alone. Changes in scar thickness, scar volume, and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) were analyzed. Patient self-assessment, VAS scores, and adverse effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: Scar thickness, volume, and VSS scores of both segments improved significantly compared to baseline. On every follow-up visit, there were no significant differences in mean scar thickness reduction between the two treatment groups except at the 6-month follow-up where the mean scar thickness reduction of the steroid injection segment was significantly lower than that of the TMFI + Steroid segment (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.35; p = 0.002). Scar volume, VSS scores, and patient self-assessment also showed no significant differences between both segments on all visits. The steroid injection segment was significantly more painful than the TMFI + Steroid segment (95% CI, -2.16 to -1.29; p < 0.001). Adverse effects of skin atrophy, telangiectasia, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation were noted in the steroid injection segment, while no adverse effects were observed at the TMFI + Steroid segment. CONCLUSIONS: TMFI-assisted topical corticosteroid delivery is an effective treatment for HTS with a lower risk of adverse effects compared with corticosteroid injection.

Treatment of periorbital wrinkles using thermo-mechanical fractional injury therapy versus fractional non-ablative 1565 nm laser: A comparative prospective, randomized, double-arm, controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Non-ablative fractional laser is an effective modality for the treatment of periorbital wrinkling, one of the earliest signs of skin aging. Thermo-mechanical fractional injury (TMFI) therapy (Tixel®, Novoxel®, Israel) is an innovative technology that is now being used for facial skin rejuvenation. Our study compares the clinical results, side effects, and downtime profile between TMFI treatment and non-ablative fractional 1565 nm laser (ResurFX®, Lumenis, Israel). METHODS: This was a prospective study of 68 patients (64 women, 4 men) with skin types I-VI in two medical centers (34 from Israel, 34 from the USA) that were randomized to receive either TMFI or NAFL treatment for periorbital wrinkling. Patients received 3-5 treatments, 3-5 weeks apart. Six months after the last treatment, the change in Fitzpatrick Wrinkling Classification System (FWCS) was calculated by three non-involved physicians and compared to pretreatment results. Side effects and downtime profiles were assessed in each group (including VAS pain assessment, time required to refrain from work and social activity, and time required for the resolution of redness, edema, and crusts.) RESULTS: A moderate improvement in periorbital wrinkling was demonstrated in both groups, with an average improvement of 1.6 ± 0.6 in FWCS in the TMFI group and an average improvement of 1.7 ± 0.8 in the NAFL group (p < 0.001). Postprocedural VAS score was 5.86 ± 2.3 in the NAFL group and 4.01 ± 2.6 in the Tixel® group. Approximately 80% of subjects returned to both work and social activities two days postprocedure. Crusts were reported by 52% of patients in the TMFI group, compared to 16% of patients in the NAFL group more than 48 hours postprocedure (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the other parameters between the two groups. CONCLUSION: TMFI is an effective and safe modality for the treatment of periorbital wrinkling, with comparable results to the 1565 nm NAFL.

Energy-based devices for the treatment of Acne Scars: 2022 International consensus recommendations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acne scars are one of the most distressing and long-term consequences of acne vulgaris, with damaging effect on a person's physical, mental, and social well-being. Numerous treatment options are available including surgical and nonsurgical techniques, depending on the clinical presentation. Although considerable advances in the development of new treatment technologies and applications have been made in the last decade, international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes have not yet caught up with current knowledge and practice in many centers. The authors intend to highlight the potential utility of energy-based devices (EBDs) for acne scarring, offer recommendations for safe and efficacious treatment, and provide consensus-based EBD treatment options based on varying presentations demonstrated in a series of real-life clinical photographs. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international panel of 24 dermatologists and plastic surgeons from 12 different countries and a variety of practice backgrounds was self-assembled to develop updated consensus recommendations for the treatment of acne scars. A two-step modified Delphi method took place between March 2020 and February 2021 consisting of two rounds of emailed questionnaires. The panel members approved the final manuscript via email correspondence. RESULTS: The manuscript includes a comprehensive discussion and panel recommendations regarding the following topics: 1. the role of EBD in mitigating and treating acne scars in a patient with active acne, 2. the use of various EBDs for the treatment of different acne scar types with special focus on commonly used laser platform such as vascular lasers, ablative fractional lasers (AFLs) and non-AFLs (NAFLs), 3. treatment combinations, and 4. acne scar treatments in skin of color. The last part comprised of 10 photos of real-life clinical cases with the panel recommendation treatment plan to achieve best aesthetic outcome. CONCLUSION: Panel members were unanimous in their view that EBDs have a role in the management of acne scars, with AFLs, NAFLs, vascular lasers, and RF devices preferentially selected by most of the panel experts. EBDs are considered a first-line treatment for a variety of acne scar types and patients without access to these treatments may not be receiving the best available care for optimal cosmetic results. Future high-quality research and updated international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes should reflect this status.

Dermal Filler Injections in Patients With Autoimmune and Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases-The Patients' Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Injecting dermal fillers in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) is controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attitudes of patients with AIIRDs regarding the use of dermal fillers and the side effects of those who underwent them. METHODS: Patients with AIIRDs who attended a rheumatology outpatient clinic between 2016 and 2018 filled in a questionnaire about their attitudes toward dermal filler injections. The questionnaire evaluated information received from professionals and the factors that influenced their decision of whether or not to undergo the procedures. RESULTS: Overall, 194 patients with AIIRDs (mean age 56.5 ± 14.0, 99% women) responded. Forty-two of them had previously undergone the injections and intended to repeat them (Group A), 37 had not received filler injections but intended to do so (Group B), and 114 who had never undergone them did not intend to undergo them. The major motivation for undergoing filler injections was social. Patients treated with dermal fillers refrained from informing their rheumatologist about their injections. They were, however, highly satisfied with the procedure and reported negligible side effects. CONCLUSION: The use of dermal fillers was apparently safe and well received by patients with AIIRDs. Physicians' recommendations to refrain from injecting them with dermal fillers should be reconsidered and evaluated in clinical studies.

Thermo-Mechanical Fractional Injury Therapy for Facial Skin Rejuvenation in Skin Types II to V: A Retrospective Double-Center Chart Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Thermo-mechanical fractional injury (TMFI) therapy (Tixel®; Novoxel®, Netanya, Israel) is an innovative technology. Along with its drug delivery enhancement features, it is widely used for facial skin rejuvenation. Our study explores the beneficial effect of the Tixel® on the different features of facial skin rejuvenation along with patients' satisfaction rate, aiming to suggest practical recommendations for an optimal aesthetic result. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 24 patients (20 women, 4 men, average age 56 years old) with skin types II-V who received 2 or 3 Tixel® treatments, 3-5 weeks apart in two medical centers (12 from Israel, 12 from the United Kingdom). Four experienced dermatologists compared standardized clinical photographs taken before each treatment and 3 months after the final treatment based on seven parameters that were set by 10 physicians and rated the difference on a scale of -1 to 4. Furthermore, epidemiology, treatment data, satisfaction, and safety were reviewed. RESULTS: Out of the seven parameters that were compared (blood vessels and erythema, skin complexion, periorbital wrinkles, pigmentation and toning, pore size, vitality, wrinkles, and laxity), all features demonstrated an overall improvement, with the greatest improvement demonstrated in skin complexion (2.1 ± 0.49) and periorbital wrinkling (2.09 ± 0.65) followed by vitality (1.7 ± 0.49). Side effects were transient, including erythema and hyperpigmentation, and the average downtime was 1.7 days. CONCLUSION: TMFI is a safe and effective method for improving facial skin quality. Addressing patient's expectations while maximizing the benefits of this novel technology will provide superior aesthetical results.

Pulse-Dye Laser Followed by Betamethasone-Calcipotriol and Fractional Ablative CO2-Laser-Assisted Delivery for Nail Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Nail psoriasis is a common and potentially debilitating condition for which no effective and safe nonsystemic therapy is currently available. Recently, laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) is being increasingly used to facilitate transcutaneous penetration of topical treatments. OBJECTIVES: We set to assess the efficacy and safety of combined pulse-dye laser and fractional CO2 laser-assisted betamethasonecalcipotriol gel delivery for the treatment of nail psoriasis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective, intrapatient comparative study in a series of 22 patients with bilateral fingernail psoriasis. Nails on the randomized hand were treated with 3 monthly sessions of pulse-dye laser to the proximal and lateral nail folds followed by fractional ablative CO2 laser to the nail plate. Between treatments and one month following the last treatment, the participants applied betamethasone propionate-calcipotriol gel once daily to the nail plate. Clinical outcome was ascertained using nails photography, the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Seventeen completed the study. Three participants withdrew from the study because of treatment-associated pain. Treatment was associated with a statistically significant improvement of the NAPSI scale (p < .002). Patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION: Combined PDL and fractional ablative CO2-LADD of betamethasone-calcipotriol gel should be considered for the treatment of nail psoriasis.

Moisture Response Films Versus the Starch Iodine Test for the Detection of Palmar Hyperhidrosis.

BACKGROUND: The starch iodine test (SIT) is the gold-standard diagnostic tool for primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PPH). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of a novel approach for the detection of PPH by moisture response films (MRF) in comparison to the SIT. METHODS: This prospective comparative study of the 2 tests was conducted on 17 patients with PPH. Disease severity was evaluated by the SIT and the MRF methods during 4 sessions (twice before and twice after botulinum toxin [BTX] injections) on different days and by different investigators. The physician's global assessment (PGA) scoring of the comparable visual results was evaluated by 2 blinded independent dermatologists. The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) scores of the patients at baseline and after the BTX injections were correlated with the SIT and MRF results. RESULTS: The objective PGA scoring of the SIT results demonstrated poor correlation, whereas the objective PGA scoring of the MRF results correlated highly with the patients' HDSS scores both at baseline and after the BTX injections. CONCLUSION: Analysis of palmar hyperhidrosis by means of MRF was superior to SIT and was demonstrated to be more efficient, convenient, and accurate.

The Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Protective Complex Combined With 50% Glycolic Acid Peel: A Double-Blinded, Split Face, Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Glycolic acid (GA) is a commonly used superficial peel with higher concentrations and lower pH levels leading to a stronger effect despite a higher risk of adverse effects (AE), which include burning, pain, itching, erythema, and edema. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the potential of a novel protective complex (NPC) to reduce facial AEs following a GA chemical peel treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty volunteers were selected for the study. A pair of numbered kits were supplied by and randomly assigned to be applied to each side of a patient’s face with either a 50% GA peel plus NPC or a control formulation with only a 50% GA peel. AEs, patient photographs, and standard and red filtered VISIA scans were evaluated by three independent dermatologists. RESULTS: The average post-treatment pain and itching were significantly higher in the control half as compared to the study half. Recovery time appeared to be significantly shorter in the treated side compared to the control side. CONCLUSION: The addition of the NPC to GA 50% peel is a highly effective, safe modality in the reduction of erythema, pain, and itching after peel application, and it provides an advantage in the post-treatment healing period. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(12):1336-1339. doi:10.36849/JDD.5939.

Treatment of port wine stain with Tixel-induced rapamycin delivery following pulsed dye laser application.

Although pulsed dye laser (PDL) is considered the gold standard treatment for port wine stains (PWS), post PDL revascularization is one of the main causes of incomplete regression and recurrence. Recently, topical sirolimus have been shown to improve treatment outcome probably through minimizing post-laser revascularization. We sought to evaluate the added value of the Tixel drug delivery system (DDS) to the PDL and topical rapamycin treatment for PWS. This case series includes three teenager patients with previously treated PWS with PDL. Upon enrollment, every stain was divided into A and B halves for treatment assignments to the following regimens: (A) PDL + DDS + rapamycin; (B) PDL + rapamycin. Subjects were instructed to apply rapamycin topically over the PWS twice daily for the entire treatment period. Assessment of the treatment and adverse reactions as well as photographs was performed at baseline and before every PDL treatment. There were clinically significant differences in blanching responses favoring PWS receiving PDL + DDS + rapamycin as compared to PDL + rapamycin alone. Transient hyperpigmentation was noted in one patient. Two patients developed mild transient irritation and dermatitis following the treatment on both halves. The use of drug delivery system combined with topical rapamycin has no remarkable adverse effects, improves the results of PDL treatment for port wine stains, and can reduce the total number of required PDL sessions.

An enhanced transcutaneous delivery of botulinum toxin for the treatment of Hailey-Hailey disease.

Successful treatment of Hailey-Hailey disease with intradermal botulinum toxin injections has been previously reported. The main disadvantages of this treatment are the excruciating pain and the risk of infections due to the numerous injections. We sought to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of a novel approach using an energy-based device (Tixel, Novoxel, and Israel), followed by the topical application of botulinum toxin Type A for the treatment of Hailey-Hailey disease. A retrospective study of all cases of histologically diagnosed cases of Hailey-Hailey disease treated with Tixel device followed by topical application of botulinum toxin between 2018 and 2019 was performed. Epidemiologic, clinical, and treatment data, including effectiveness score and safety, were reviewed. The study included eight patients, of whom seven patients (87.5%) showed good or partial response. No systemic or local adverse effects were reported. There was no difference in effectivity between different body areas. Response to treatment ranged between patients with an average duration of 7.125 months after the second treatment. Tixel treatment followed by topical application of botulinum toxin can be considered in the treatment of Hailey-Hailey disease. This approach is less invasive, less painful, and yet effective as well as safe.

Enhanced Percutaneous Delivery of Beta-Blockers Using Thermal Resurfacing Drug Delivery System for Topical Treatment of Infantile Hemangiomas.

BACKGROUND: Infantile hemangiomas (IHs) are the most common vascular tumors in children. In the past few years, topical beta-blockers (bBs) have been reported to be an effective treatment of superficial IHs. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of enhanced percutaneous delivery of bBs for the treatment of IH. METHODS: A retrospective study of all cases of IHs treated with enhanced percutaneous delivery of bBs between 2018 and 2019 was performed. Epidemiologic, clinical, and treatment data, including effectiveness score and safety, were reviewed. RESULTS: The study included 11 patients with a total of 11 IHs. Of the total number of IHs, 7 (63.7%) showed a good response to treatment and 4 (36.3%) had a partial response; thus all patients (100%) had good or partial response to treatment. No systemic or local adverse effects were reported. LIMITATIONS: This is an uncontrolled retrospective study. CONCLUSION: Enhanced percutaneous delivery of bBs is a safe and efficient topical therapy for IH.

Thermomechanical Ablation-Assisted Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris. A Retrospective Chart Review of 30 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acne vulgaris, a chronic inflammatory disease, affects more than 90% of teenagers. The first-line treatments for acne vulgaris are topical and oral medications, mainly antibiotics and retinoids. However, antibiotic resistance of Propionibacterium acnes, contraindications, partial response, significant adverse effects, or recurrence creates demand for novel treatment options in acne. Aminolevulinic acid (ALA) photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a well-established modality in the treatment of acne. Nevertheless, PDT has limitations: it may not be effective for every patient; several treatments are usually required to achieve sufficient outcome; incubation time is 1-3 hours; treatment pain and post-treatment downtime may be difficult for some patients to endure; and adverse effects may occur. This retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PDT, assisted by a thermomechanical ablation (TMA) fractional injury device in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe acne. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 30 acne patients treated with TMA immediately before 5% ALA application with an incubation time of 1 hour and exposure to 60 J/cm2 red light (630 nm). Patients received up to three monthly treatments and were followed for 16 weeks. Two independent investigators evaluated the subject outcomes according to high definition photographs taken at baseline, before each treatment and at follow-up visits. Three acne grading methods were used: Acne Grading Scoring System (AGSS), the Leeds revised acne grading system, and the general response to the treatment score. Patients also provided self-assessments of improvement using the patient global impression of change (PGIC). RESULTS: Compared with baseline, the AGSS has showed a statistically significant reduction of 26.7% and 23.7%, respectively, at weeks 8 and 16 after final treatment. The Leeds score showed 65.2% and 60.6% improvement at the respective visits. The overall response rate was graded 3.3 ± 0.5 out of 4. PGIC score given by the patients was 5.5 out of 7, reflecting high satisfaction. CONCLUSION: TMA used immediately prior to ALA application may enhance the effectiveness of PDT in the treatment of acne with minimal side effects, reduced downtime, and fewer sessions. The exact mechanism of TMA-assisted PDT is still to be understood. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Laser Treatment of Traumatic Scars and Contractures: 2020 International Consensus Recommendations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is currently intense multidisciplinary interest and a maturing body of literature regarding laser treatments for traumatic scars, but international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes have not yet caught up with current knowledge and practice in many centers. The authors intend to highlight the tremendous potential of laser techniques, offer recommendations for safe and efficacious treatment, and promote wider patient access guided by future high-quality research. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international panel of 26 dermatologists and plastic and reconstructive surgeons from 13 different countries and a variety of practice backgrounds was self-assembled to develop updated consensus recommendations for the laser treatment of traumatic scars. A three-step modified Delphi method took place between March 2018 and March 2019 consisting of two rounds of emailed questionnaires and supplementary face-to-face meetings. The panel members approved the final manuscript via email correspondence, and the threshold for consensus was at least 80% concurrence among the panel members. RESULTS: The manuscript includes extensive detailed discussion regarding a variety of laser platforms commonly used for traumatic scar management such as vascular lasers and ablative and non-ablative fractional lasers, special considerations such as coding and laser treatments in skin of color, and 25 summary consensus recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Lasers are a first-line therapy in the management of traumatic scars and contractures, and patients without access to these treatments may not be receiving the best available care after injury. Updated international treatment guidelines and reimbursement schemes, additional high-quality research, and patient access should reflect this status. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.