Coronary artery to aortic luminal attenuation ratio in coronary CT angiography for the diagnosis of haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of the coronary artery to aortic luminal attenuation ratio (CAR), transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG), and corrected coronary opacification (CCO) difference on coronary CT angiography (cCTA) for detecting haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. METHODS: 33 patients who underwent cCTA, gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and invasive coronary angiography within 3 months were included in this retrospective study. The degree of coronary stenosis on cCTA was visually assessed in all patients. Additionally, CAR, TAG, and CCO difference were analyzed and calculated in all patients. Haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis was defined as a vessel with ≥50% luminal stenosis on invasive coronary angiography and an associated abnormal perfusion defect on MPI in the same territory. Diagnostic performance was assessed on a per-vessel basis by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). RESULTS: Among 99 vessels, 12 were excluded and the remaining 87 were analyzed. 17 (19.5%) vessels were determined as haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. On ROC analysis, the AUC was 0.71 for cCTA, 0.80 for CAR, 0.61 for TAG, 0.74 for CCO, 0.87 for combined CAR and cCTA, 0.77 for combined TAG and cCTA, and 0.75 for combined CCO and cCTA. The AUC for combined CAR and cCTA was significantly greater compared with cCTA alone (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Non-invasive CAR derived from 64-detector row CT was feasible and might be helpful for the detection of haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis. Still, further investigations such as intra- and inter-reader correlation, evaluation of larger numbers in different settings, and time efficiency are required for applying CAR in various situations. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CAR could be used as novel noninvasive technique to detect haemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis.

Image quality improvement of single-shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging of female pelvis using a convolutional neural network.

We have developed a deep learning-based approach to improve image quality of single-shot turbo spin-echo (SSTSE) images of female pelvis. We aimed to compare the deep learning-based single-shot turbo spin-echo (DL-SSTSE) images of female pelvis with turbo spin-echo (TSE) and conventional SSTSE images in terms of image quality.One hundred five and 21 subjects were used as training and test sets, respectively. We performed 6-fold cross validation. In the training process, low-quality images were generated from TSE images as input. TSE images were used as ground truth images. In the test process, the trained convolutional neural network was applied to SSTSE images. The output images were denoted as DL-SSTSE images. Apart from DL-SSTSE images, classical filtering methods were adopted to SSTSE images. Generated images were denoted as F-SSTSE images. Contrast ratio (CR) of gluteal fat and myometrium and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of gluteal fat were measured for all images. Two radiologists graded these images using a 5-point scale and evaluated the image quality with regard to overall image quality, contrast, noise, motion artifact, boundary sharpness of layers in the uterus, and the conspicuity of the ovaries. CRs, SNRs, and image quality scores were compared using the Steel-Dwass multiple comparison tests.CRs and SNRs were significantly higher in DL-SSTSE, F-SSTSE, and TSE images than in SSTSE images. Scores with regard to overall image quality, contrast, noise, and boundary sharpness of layers in the uterus were significantly higher on DL-SSTSE and TSE images than on SSTSE images. There were no significant differences in the CRs, SNRs, and respective scores between DL-SSTSE and TSE images. The score with regard to motion artifacts was significantly higher on DL-SSTSE, F-SSTSE, and SSTSE images than on TSE images. The score with regard to the conspicuity of ovaries was significantly higher on DL-SSTSE images than on F-SSTSE, SSTSE, and TSE images (P < .001).DL-SSTSE images showed higher image quality as compared with SSTSE images. In comparison with conventional TSE images, DL-SSTSE images had acceptable image quality while keeping the advantage of the motion artifact-robustness and acquisition time efficiency in SSTSE imaging.

Comparison of gadoxetic acid-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and contrast-enhanced computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of colorectal liver metastases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) vs. contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) in the detection of liver metastasis in colorectal carcinoma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-hundred fifty-eight consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed colorectal carcinoma underwent EOB-MRI and CE-CT; 68 patients had 105 surgically confirmed liver metastases. Diagnostic analyses were performed according to sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for liver metastasis detection in combined arterial- and hepatocyte-phase images vs. CE-CT by three readers blinded to clinical data. Diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity were evaluated using the alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic method. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of EOB-MRI (91.4%) was significantly higher than that of CE-CT (80.9%, p < 0.001); the higher sensitivity of EOB-MRI was observed especially in smaller-sized lesions (73.3 vs. 56.0% for lesions ≤1 cm; 91.9 vs. 80.8% for lesions >1 cm and ≤2 cm; 99.2 vs. 95.7% for lesions >2 cm). EOB-MRI showed a significantly greater area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az value = 0.970) compared with CE-CT (Az value = 0.899, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: EOB-MRI provided higher detectability for liver metastases, especially for smaller-sized lesions, than CE-CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Utility of Amplatzer Vascular Plug with Preoperative Common Hepatic Artery Embolization for Distal Pancreatectomy with En Bloc Celiac Axis Resection.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP) for preoperative common hepatic embolization (CHA) before distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) to redistribute blood flow to the stomach and liver via the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients (3 males, 1 female; median age 69 years) with locally advanced pancreatic body cancer underwent preoperative CHA embolization with AVP. After embolization, SMA arteriography was performed to confirm the alteration of blood flow from the SMA to the proper hepatic artery. RESULTS: In three of four patients, technical successes were achieved with sufficient margin from the origin of gastroduodenal artery. In one patient, the margin was less than 5 mm, although surgery was successfully performed without any problem. Eventually, all patients underwent the DP-CAR without arterial reconstruction or liver ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: AVP application is feasible and safe as an embolic procedure for preoperative CHA embolization of DP-CAR.