The formulary process for biosimilar additions at a comprehensive cancer center.

Biological products may be used to diagnose, prevent, treat, and cure diseases and medical conditions, including cancer. Biosimilar agents, approved under an abbreviated 351(k) pathway, continue to increase in number and market share for biologic agents, especially for cancer care. Although biosimilars offer the potential for improved access to care, their introduction to the marketplace has created significant disruption. It is imperative that health systems providing care to patients with cancer develop a well-defined process to address the challenges associated with biosimilars. This descriptive article outlines pharmacy considerations for biosimilars and describes the current practices at The Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute at The Ohio State University. Biosimilars have and will continue to significantly impact oncology care. Organizations must understand the clinical, operational, and financial challenges associated with the use of these products.

Pharmacy utilization of electronic patient-reported outcomes in oncology populations.

Telehealth applications are demonstrated to be useful tools for patients with cancer to facilitate improvements in quality of care. The use of electronic patient-reported outcomes is one way to leverage telehealth to better understand outcomes important to patients. However, use of electronic patient-reported outcomes and direct involvement of pharmacists is not yet a standard practice across cancer centers. The use of pharmacist-led telehealth services offers a unique opportunity for pharmacists to provide cost-effective and convenient patient care interventions. This survey work describes the current practices of pharmacy utilization of electronic patient-reported outcomes in oncology populations at National Comprehensive Cancer Network member institutions. Of survey respondents, only 33% of the institutions reported current engagement with electronic patient-reported outcomes. These initiatives largely focused on symptom management. Limitations in staff, resources, and competing priorities limit many institutions from introducing or expanding upon direct pharmacist involvement in electronic patient-reported outcomes. Further work developing the involvement of pharmacists in electronic patient-reported outcomes will be an important way to leverage the growing landscape of telehealth within oncology and highlight the value of the pharmacist.