Severe hypercholesterolaemia: therapeutic goals and eligibility criteria for LDL apheresis in Europe.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the use of currently available lipid-lowering therapies, a significant proportion of patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia do not reach treatment goals and consequently remain at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). On the basis of clinical experience, these patients tend to have the most severe forms of familial hypercholesterolaemia or markedly elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels but are unable to tolerate statin therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: LDL apheresis is currently the best treatment option (or treatment rescue) to bring these patients closer to therapeutic LDL objectives, and has been shown to reduce the risk of CVD along with LDL-C levels. However, criteria for LDL apheresis eligibility and the percentage of patients receiving treatment vary widely from country to country across Europe. Despite the proven benefits of LDL apheresis, access to this procedure remains limited because of its high cost and low availability, reflecting inherent limitations of this treatment modality. SUMMARY: There is a need to both better define the patient population eligible for LDL apheresis and to create unified European guidelines governing the use of apheresis. In addition to improving access to apheresis where appropriate, new therapies are needed to further decrease LDL-C and reduce the ongoing CVD risk in patients with severe hypercholesterolaemia.

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis in children with familial hypercholesterolemia: follow-up to 21 years.

Twenty-seven patients (14 girls, 13 boys) affected by familial hypercholesterolemia who had begun low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis treatment before the age of 15 were studied. The median age at diagnosis was 4 years and the blood LDL cholesterol level was 704 +/- 163 mg/dL. Screening was performed for homozygous or double heterozygous mutations of the LDL cholesterol receptor gene and mutations were found in 24 of the patients. The mean age at the beginning of treatment was 8.5 years and the mean length of follow up was 12.6 years. The two main procedures used were direct adsorption of lipoproteins and dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption. Nine patients experienced anaphylactic reactions due to bradykinin and six had to have their treatment changed. The LDL cholesterol level before the session was lowered by 45 +/- 11% of the value at diagnosis. The LDL cholesterol reduction in a session was 72 +/- 10%. Tendinous xanthomas disappeared or diminished dramatically in 62% of the children. In 22 patients no cardiovascular event occurred during LDL apheresis treatment. Three had angina pectoris; two others had surgical management of aortic stenosis, but no clinical manifestations. Seven children had normal cardiovascular pictures while on treatment. Eleven had abnormalities of the aortic root or coronary arteries, which in six cases had appeared before treatment; the other five children did not undergo prior cardiac evaluation. In five children the abnormalities appeared during treatment. Based on these data, LDL-apheresis can be recommended for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, even in young children, with good efficiency on biological parameters, cutaneous lesions and cardiovascular events.