A pilot study on sports activities in pediatric palliative care: just do it.

BACKGROUND: There has been a growing interest in studying the value of physical exercise in children with disabilities or chronic health conditions because of evidence of improvement in quality of life, social acceptance, and physical functioning. However, only scant evidence exists for routine sports activities in children requiring pediatric palliative care (PPC), and in most cases, such evidence has been collected in oncological patients. The Pediatric Hospice of Padua is the referral center for PPC in the Veneto region (northern Italy). Starting from the experience of this PPC center, this pilot study aims to describe the personal experience of children and young people who practice physical activity and their caregivers' perspectives, focusing particularly on the emotional and social impact of exercise and sports practice. METHODS: Patients involved in at least one regular and structured sports activity were included in the pilot analysis. Two different ICF-CY (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth Version) scales ("Body Function" and "Activity and Participation") were filled out to assess the children's global functional competence. Two online ad hoc questionnaires were created and administered to children, when able to respond, and caregivers. RESULTS: A total of 9% of patients reported being involved in a sports activity. All children who played sports did not have indications of cognitive retardation. The most practiced sport was swimming. The use of standardized methods such as ICF-CY shown that severe motor impairments do not limit sports accessibility. Questionnaires result suggest that sports are a positive experience for both children needing PPC and their parents. Children encourage other children to do sports and can find the positive side even in difficulties. CONCLUSION: Since PPC is encouraged as early as the diagnosis of incurable pathologies, the inclusion of sports activities in the context of a PPC plan should be considered from the perspective of improving quality of life.

Is it early enough? The authentic meaning of the pediatric palliative approach between early and late referral in pediatric oncology: a case study.

The literature widely supports the benefits of early integration of palliative care into pediatric oncological care; however, many barriers to its successful integration remain. Integrating palliative care as early as possible in the oncology pathway is critical, but other criteria are relevant to positive results. This paper aims to contribute to the early/late referral dualism in pediatric palliative care (PPC) and highlight the importance of a collaborative approach between oncologists and palliative care teams. This study investigates the impact of early versus late referral to PPC, intersecting it with the synergy work between services and the related outcomes. The four pediatric cancer cases were selected based on clinical (e.g., disease duration, multiple treatments, and pain management), management (e.g., involvement of multiple services and multiple home-hospital transitions), and relevance of multidisciplinary team (e.g., difficult clinical decisions and ethical discussions) criteria. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining qualitative case analysis using clinical diaries, literature review, and practice guidelines development. Critical clinical information, time course, clinician-family communication, and patient involvement were analyzed. The outcomes show how simultaneous care creates continuous discussion and dialogue between professionals. The results indicate the importance of better communication and care coordination to improve patient and family satisfaction, highlighting the uniqueness of the pediatric field and the relationship with children and families. Through the discussion of clinical cases and a literature review, we provide practical guidance for clinicians working in oncology and PPC. These findings underscore the crucial need for a multidisciplinary approach in pediatric oncology, advocating policy changes to support early PPC integration and translate it into complementarity best operating practices. In conclusion, besides assessing the timeliness of referral to the PPC service, the synergy, harmony, and choral work of the professionals involved are equally valuable for a quality-of-life-oriented care plan.

Polypharmacy in Children with Medical Complexity: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Pediatric Palliative Care Center.

BACKGROUND: Children with medical complexity (CMC) often require multiple medications, leading to polypharmacy, which seems to be linked to adverse effects, administration errors, and increased caregiver burden. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of polypharmacy, medication burden, off-label drug use, and associated costs. METHODS: Conducted at the Pediatric Palliative Care Center of Padua, Italy, from August to October 2021, this cross-sectional observational study included patients up to 23 years old with at least one prescribed drug. Data were collected from medical records and caregiver interviews. Drug costs were collected from the Italian Medicine Agency. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. For comparisons among categorical variables, the Chi-square test was used, and for those among continuous variables, the ANOVA test was used. RESULTS: This study analyzed treatment regimens of 169 patients with a median age of 12.5 years (0.3-23). Polypharmacy was present in 52.7% of patients, and medication burden was observed in 44.4%, both varying significantly by primary diagnosis (p < 0.001). The median daily cost per patient was EUR 2.2 (IQR 0.9-7.1), with significant variation among subgroups. Only 34.6% of prescriptions were off-label. CONCLUSIONS: polypharmacy and medication burden are frequent among our CMC population, with some differences according to primary diagnosis.

Old Drug, New Pain. Roles and Challenges of Methadone Therapy in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.

Background: Pediatric palliative care (PPC) is defined as the prevention and relief from suffering of families and children with life-limiting (LLDs) or life-threatening diseases (LTDs). These patients often experience pain, with morphine being the most widely used drug to treat it. Few studies investigated the role of methadone in PPC patients, although it is considered among the most effective and underutilized drugs in PPC. Objectives: Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and dosage of methadone in PPC. Methods: Between August and October 2021 PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on the use of methadone in children with LLDs and LTDs. Articles were included if they met the following criteria: published in the last 10 years, English language, patients aged 0-23 years; children enrolled in a PPC center or receiving declared support from a PPC service; reporting of specific data on methadone in interventional trials, observational studies, or case series on >10 patients. The reporting of the article was guided by the PRISMA guidelines, and a critical appraisal of the included studies was performed using the JBI-tool. Results: After duplicates removal and full-text assessment, four studies were included and another one was added after checking the references of the retrieved papers. All were retrospective, and the literature is concordant in documenting the lack of evidence. A total of 116 children received methadone in PPC. From our review emerges the poor quality of data collection: in only one study pain was assessed with standardized scales. All studies documented the effectiveness of methadone in treating complex pain, either nociceptive or neuropathic. No serious adverse events were reported, with no cases of cardiac arrhythmias. Conclusion: Our results suggest that methadone could represent a suitable strategy for treating pain in PPC. However, the evidence base is insufficient, and further research is warranted.

Pediatric Palliative Care in Oncology: Basic Principles.

About 4 million children with an oncological disease worldwide require pediatric palliative care (PPC) due to the nature of their condition. PPC is not limited to end-of-life care; it is a general approach continuing over the entire disease trajectory, regardless of whether the patient receives any oncological treatment. This review addresses the value of integrating PPC in treating children with cancer, focusing on the basic principles of PPC and its application in pediatric oncology. Moreover, models for PPC implementation in oncology, end-of-life care, and advanced care planning are discussed.

The Intervention Areas of the Psychologist in Pediatric Palliative Care: A Retrospective Analysis.

Infants, children and adolescents with life-limiting and life-threatening disease need long-term care that may change according to disease's natural history. With the primary goal of quality of life, the psychologist of pediatric palliative care (PPC) network deals with a large variety of issues. Little consideration has been given to the variety of intervention areas of psychology in PPC that concern the whole life span of the patient and family. The PPC network is composed by a multidisciplinary team of palliative care specialists that intervenes at home, in the hospital and in every place where the patient is living. The network coordinates different public health services to respond to clinical, psychosocial and spiritual needs. In these scenarios, the psychological need is not a single event but a moment inserted in the complexity of the child's needs. This retrospective monocentric project consists of an analysis of characteristics of psychological interventions in our PPC service. The time frame taken into consideration is 2019-2020, analyzing the clinical records of 186 patients of Pediatric Palliative Care and Pain Service of Veneto Region (Italy). The areas that emerged in the analysis show how the intervention of the psychologist in PPC does not concern only end-of-life, but a series of topics that are significant for the family to guarantee psycho-social wellbeing oriented toward the best quality of life. In conclusion, these different topics highlight the complexity of the child and family experience. This variety must be taken into consideration, the psychologist must increase holistic support with a dedicated skills curriculum.

The use of medical cannabis in pediatric palliative care: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Medical cannabis may be a useful tool for managing treatment-resistant epilepsy and chronic pain, which affect many patients in pediatric palliative care (PPC); however, little evidence is available in this setting. CASE PRESENTATION: We aimed to describe a clinical experience in a setting where high-level evidence may not be obtained. We report our clinical experience in a pediatric palliative care department in Italy. Caregivers reported changes in intensity and frequency of pain and epilepsy events. Six patients received a titrated plant extract of cannabis sativa for 1 year. Only mild and transient adverse events occurred: drowsiness, euphoria, restlessness and tachycardia; the resolution was either spontaneous or obtained by modifying the administration schedule. Treatment was never discontinued. No overdoses occurred. All patients experienced seizures during the pre-treatment observation period, and obtained a reduction in seizure frequency, although with variable extent while receiving cannabis. In addition, a benefit on pain was observed, based on the caregiver's evaluation, and a reduction of analgesic use. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that a titrated plant extract preparation of medical cannabis may be useful to control treatment-resistant pain and epilepsy in PPC patients.

COVID-19 in pediatric palliative care: what can we learn from the pandemic and possible future directions.

INTRODUCTION: Patients in pediatric palliative care (PPC) live with multiple comorbidities which represent a risk factor for severe form of COVID-19. METHODS: This monocentric retrospective study was performed at the PPC Center of Padua (Italy). Testing methodology, prevention strategies and infection characteristics were documented and compared during the first and second peak of SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Between April-June 2020 a population swab screening was performed and a strong reduction of the habitual family support was observed. Between November 2020-January 2021 swab testing was limited to specific cases and the support network for families was partially restored. Incidence of COVID-19 was low, resulting in 0.04% of total pediatic cases in the Veneto Region. No severe forms were observed. CONCLUSION: The use of adequate preventive measures by families and support networks associated with testing in specific contests is safe, cost effective and has a minor impact on caregiver's care load.