Impact of preoperative body mass index and weight loss on morbidity and mortality following colorectal cancer-a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Body weight and preoperative weight loss (WL) are controversially discussed as risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality in colorectal cancer surgery. The objective of this study is to determine whether body mass index (BMI) or WL is associated with a higher postoperative complication rate. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, data analysis of 1241 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery in an 11-year period was performed. The main outcome measures were wound infections (WI), anastomotic leakages (AL), and in-house mortality. RESULTS: A total of 697 (56%) patients with colon and 544 (44%) with rectum carcinoma underwent surgery. The rate of WI for each location increased with rising BMI. The threshold value was 28.8 kg/m2. Obese patients developed significantly more WI than normal-weight patients did following rectal resection (18.0% vs. 8.2%, p = 0.018). Patients with preoperative WL developed significantly more AL following colon resections than did patients without preoperative WL (6.2% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.046). In-house mortality was significantly higher in obese patients following colon resections than in overweight patients (4.3% vs. 0.4%, p = 0.012). Regression analysis with reference to postoperative in-house mortality revealed neither increased BMI nor WL as an independent risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Increased preoperative BMI is associated with a higher WI rate. AL rate after colon resection was significantly higher in patients showing preoperative WL. Preoperative BMI and WL are therefore risk factors for postoperative morbidity in this study. Nevertheless, this has to be further clarified by means of prospective studies. Trial registration DRKS00025359, 21.05.2021, retrospectively registered.

Early postoperative endoscopic evaluation of rectal anastomoses: a prospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Reported incidence of anastomotic leakage (AL) of rectal anastomoses is up to 29% with an overall mortality up to 12%. Nevertheless, there is no uniform evidence-based diagnostic procedure for early detection of AL. The objective of this prospective clinical trial was to demonstrate the diagnostic value of early postoperative flexible endoscopy for rectal anastomosis evaluation. METHODS: Flexible endoscopy between 5 and 8th postoperative day was performed consecutively in 90 asymptomatic patients. Sample size calculation was made using the two-stage Simon design. Diagnostic value was measured by management change after endoscopic evaluation. Anastomoses were categorized according to a new classification. Study is registered in German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00019217). RESULTS: Of the 90 anastomoses, 59 (65.6%) were unsuspicious. 20 (22.2%) were suspicious with partial fibrin plaques (n = 15), intramural hematoma and/or local blood coagulum (n = 4) and ischemic area in one. 17 of these anastomoses were treated conservatively under monitoring. In three a further endoscopic re-evaluation was performed and as consequence one patient underwent endoscopic vacuum therapy. 11 (12.2%) AL were detected. Here, two could be treated conservatively under monitoring, four with endoscopic vacuum therapy and five needed revision surgery. No intervention-related adverse events occurred. A change in postoperative management was made in 31 (34.4%) patients what caused a significant improvement of diagnosis of AL (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative endoscopic evaluation of rectal anastomoses is a safe procedure thus allows early detection of AL. Early treatment for suspicious anastomoses or AL could be adapted to avoid severe morbidity and mortality.

Long-term results of the custom- made hip endoprostheses Evolution K® and Adaptiva®: A prospective cohort study.

The aim of our study is to evaluate clinical long-term results and determine changes in periprosthetic bone density of the custom-made hip prostheses Evolution-K ® and Adaptiva ® . Periprosthetic bone density were evaluated by means of DEXA (LunariDXA- Prodigy® bone densitometer) with a long-term follow-up of 16 (15-18) years (Evolution-K®) in 24 patients and 13 (13-15) years (Adaptiva®) in 41 patients. Evolution- K® had a survival rate of 92% and yielded 79/100 points in Harris Hip Score, a mediocre result. Adaptiva® had a survival rate of 99% and achieved a good score of 88/100 points. Bone density measurements demonstrated the greatest loss of bone density in the proximal regions of interest (ROI) for both prosthesis types (Evolution-K®: -25.8% ROI 1, -40.3% ROI 7; -8.3% ROI 2, -10.4% ROI 6; Adaptiva®: -29.8% ROI 7, -6.8% ROI 6, +14.3% ROI 3, +3.1% ROI 4). Adaptiva® yielded a good clinical result as compared to Evolution-K® with only average clinical results. Both prostheses clearly showed signs of "stress shielding". Here, the Adaptiva® achieved reduced bone density loss as compared to the Evolution-K®.