Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anesth Analg ; 126(6): 2069-2077, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29293181

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Based on the assumption that relatively large volumes of local anesthetic optimize an adductor canal block (ACB), we theorized that an ACB administered as repeated boluses would improve analgesia without compromising mobility, compared with a continuous infusion. METHODS: We performed a randomized, blinded, controlled study, including patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia. Patients received 0.2% ropivacaine via a catheter in the adductor canal administered as either repeated intermittent boluses (21 mL/3 h) or continuous infusion (7 mL/h). The primary outcome was total (postoperative day [POD], 0-2) opioid consumption (mg), administered as patient-controlled analgesia. Pain, ambulation, and quadriceps muscle strength were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: We randomized 110 patients, of whom 107 were analyzed. Total opioid consumption (POD, 0-2) was a median (range) of 23 mg (0-139) in the bolus group and 26 mg (3-120) in the infusion group (estimated median difference, 4 mg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13 to 5; P = .29). Linear mixed-model analyses revealed no difference in pain during knee flexion (mean difference, 2.6 mm; 95% CI, -2.9 to 8.0) or at rest (mean difference, 1.7 mm; 95% CI, -1.5 to 4.9). Patients in the bolus group had improved quadriceps sparing on POD 2 (median difference, 7.4%; 95% CI, 0.5%-15.5%). However, this difference was not present on POD 1 or reflected in the ambulation tests (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Changing the mode of administration for an ACB from continuous infusion to repeated intermittent boluses did not decrease opioid consumption, pain, nor mobility.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Raquianestesia/métodos , Bloqueio Nervoso Autônomo/métodos , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Músculo Quadríceps/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas/métodos , Injeções Intravenosas/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Pós-Operatória/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Método Simples-Cego
2.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 183(21)2021 05 24.
Artigo em Dinamarquês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34060464

RESUMO

Bite wounds are common in the emergency departments in Denmark. As a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, more people are adopting pets and the number of hours spent at home with pets are increasing. This will probably result in more bite wounds and therefore, it is as important as ever for emergency doctors to be able to treat bite wounds appropriately. In this review, we summarise the most common types of bite wounds, how to make a thorough physical examination, what to focus on in the anamnesis, and how to treat bite wounds including when to suture and the indications for prophylactic antibiotics.


Assuntos
Mordeduras e Picadas , COVID-19 , Infecção dos Ferimentos , Animais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Mordeduras e Picadas/epidemiologia , Mordeduras e Picadas/terapia , Gatos , Cães , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Infecção dos Ferimentos/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA