RESUMO
Integrin subunit α3 (ITGA3) is a member of the integrin family and interacts with extracellular matrix proteins. However, there have been few reports regarding the role of ITGA3 in papillary thyroid cancer. The expression levels of ITGA3 were firstly analyzed by bioinformatics tools and in vitro experiments, followed by evaluating its prognostic significance in papillary thyroid cancer patients using Kaplan-Meier, receiver operating characteristic, and Cox regression analyses. Then, cBioportal and GSCA databases were applied to evaluate genetic alterations of ITGA3. Functional enrichment analysis was conducted and the upstream miRNAs of ITGA3 were determined. The results showed that the ITGA3 mRNA and protein levels were higher in the papillary thyroid cancer group than those in the normal group (all P < 0.05). Moreover, ITGA3 performed well in distinguishing the recurrence-free survival (RFS) status and served as an independent prognostic factor of papillary thyroid cancer patients (P < 0.01). Besides, significant relations between ITGA3 and genetic alterations were observed (FDR <0.01). Functional enrichment analysis indicated ECM-receptor interaction and cell adhesion molecules were the shared regulatory pathways. Moreover, ITGA3 might be the target gene of hsa-miR-3129, hsa-miR-181d, hsa-miR-181b, hsa-miR-199a, and hsa-miR-199b. Of note, the ITGA3 mRNA level was reduced after has-miR-199b-3p/5p was overexpressed. In conclusion, ITGA3 could be a reliable biomarker and have potential value in predicting the RFS status of papillary thyroid cancer patients.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Controversies exist for which treatment is optimal for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): radiofrequency ablation (RFA), surgical resection (SR), or transplantation (LT). We compared outcomes between treatments as first-line therapy for HCC patients measuring up to 5 cm or different cancer risk groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was retrieved for HCC patients treated with RFA, SR, or LT between 2004 and 2015. The effects of three treatments were compared using propensity score, inverse probability of treatment weights adjustment, and instrumental variable analysis for overall survival (OS) and competing risks regression models for disease-specific survival (DSS). We also evaluated whether the effect of treatments varied according to baseline clinical characteristics by locally weighted regression method. RESULTS: Of 7664 patients, RFA and SR yielded worse OS (HR 1.67, CI 1.43-1.70, P<0.001; HR 1.43, CI 1.40-1.67, P<0.001) and DSS (HR 2.00, CI 1.10-3.30, P<0.011; HR 2.50, CI 2.00-3.30, P<0.001) than LT. In patients with small tumors, SR may confer more survival benefits than RFA (HR>1) for different tumor sizes measuring up to 5 cm and may be an appropriate first-line treatment. Additionally, RFA has more survival benefits compared with SR (HR 0.83, CI 0.53-1.25) for those patients with low tumor risk and good general health condition (without any prognostic risk factors). However, those patients with a predicted 5-year overall mortality risk >30% seem to benefit more for SR than RFA. CONCLUSION: Due to a shortage of donors, RFA and SR can be applied as either primary management of HCC or as a bridging therapy for LT. Furthermore, SR is an effective option for patients with different HCC tumor size. However, RFA could achieve comparable survival benefits with SR for patients without any risk factors.